> Hi all,
>
> With all this talk about Stetzer filters, I decided to ask the folks
> at Quantum Products if there would be any advantage to using
> Stetzer filters if I already owned Quantum Products devices.
> Their reply is below (note that the Mark that is referred
> to in this email is the inventor of the Quantum Products,
> not me!)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for your question :)
>
> Other people have asked us the same thing. If the "Stetzerizer filter"
> works by blocking or cutting off the higher frequencies then it will
> not be necessary if you have a Quantum environmental unit.
>
> There is no real advantage to cutting off the higher frequencies. That
> 'solution' arises due lack of knowledge about how to increase the
> integrity of the signal.
>
> The logic behind cutting off the higher frequencies is that the higher
> frequencies are more fragile and more vulnerable to breaking down into
> noise. It is the noise that triggers the stress response in living
> systems, so it makes sense to cut off the frequencies that are most
> likely to break down and turn into noise IF you do not know how to
> strengthen the signal so that it does not break down so easily.
>
> Quantum Products use a technology that strengthens the underlying
> coherence of electric currents so they do not collapse into noise.
> Cutting off the higher frequencies does nothing to neutralize the noise
> of the lower frequencies.
>
> Until the technology governing Quantum Products was discovered there
> was no way to raise the signal-to-noise ratio of electronic signals.
> We have tested Quantum Products and they have been shown to increase
> the signal-to-noise ratio significantly (by as much as 108% so far).
>
> Mark is constantly upgrading the products and now has discovered that
> the increase in signal-to-noise ratio has very practical applications
> in many areas. An increase in signal-to-noise ratio, when applied to
> the wireless industry, for example, increases coverage. We have
> measured at least a 50% increase in wireless coverage so far.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>