Re: response to Marc #2

Posted by Marc Martin on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/response-to-Marc-2-tp1538453p1538457.html

> I was vegetarian for over 30 years, until I realized that it was not
> supporting my health but weakening it.

My health has done nothing but improve since I started being
a vegetarian. Also, according to the blood type diet, I should
be a vegetarian (blood type A), and according to EAV testing,
I'm allergic to beef. Of course, I realize that there are
organic, grass-fed chicken, etc., which admittedly I have
not explored.

> However, when we have chronic health problems, it is good to get to
> the cause, rather than just using bandaids.

Well of course... but if you're severely toxic, you cannot
magically expect to detox overnight. It can years... in
the meantime, the bandaids allow you to live your life,
earn a living, etc.

> This is one of the reasons that I am wary of gizmos that don't have
> measurable results.

There are many gizmos out there that have measurable results,
as long as you are using your body as the measuring device,
not some EMF meter or oscilloscope.

> it is not reducing the actual RF exposure you are receiving,
> which may result in health failure. This is the reason that
> the GS filters are so valuable

Well, like I said, I spend 8+ hours/day sitting in front of
a computer. GS filters are not going to reduce my exposure
to the radiation emitting from the computer screen. Only
a change of profession will do that. :-)

> This does not mean, however, that the frequencies generated
> by computers, etcetera will have no long term effect on my
> health, does it?

Well, according to the people who sell various EMF protection
devices, the frequencies can be changed from unhealthy to
healthy, while still being noisy on the oscilliscope and
still having a large field strength. My own experiences with
these devices don't contradict what they are saying.

Marc