> Hi Charles!
>
> Where can I get more info about this "HAARP Detector"?
>
> I checked the HAARP-projects main page and found out that HAARP can
> operate on frequencies between 2.8MHz and 10MHz.
>
> It must be secondary effects that you might be able to measure in the
> span 5kHz to 150kHz.
>
> As far as i get it HAARP isn't used on a daily base.
>
> Greetings
>
> Anders
> --------------
>
> Charles wrote:
>
> > Hello Anders,
> >
> > I wish you luck.
> >
> > The tolerance of +/- 3 dB goes also for the very expensive instruments.
> >
> > According to the manufacturer, this meter measures the HAARP signals.
> > Therefore it is called *HAARP Detektor*.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Charles Claessens
> > member Verband Baubiologie
> > www.milieuziektes.nl
> > www.hetbitje.nl
> > checked by Norton Antivirus
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anders Eriksson" <
[hidden email]>
> > To: <
[hidden email]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 12:41
> > Subject: Re: [eSens] VLF
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi Charles,
> >>
> >>of course I know that you can't get a spectrum from true DC, but perhaps
> >>0.01Hz or so (I will probably cover the region 0.01Hz-250kHz with home
> >>made constructions).
> >>
> >>And to span 0.01Hz-3GHz will take probably 3-4 different instruments.
> >>
> >>Tolerance of +/- 3dB goes for cheap instruments in the range of
> >>2000$-3000$ I guess.
> >>
> >>By the way, isn't HAARP active at about 4MHz, not 30kHz-150kHz?
> >>
> >>Greetings,
> >>
> >>Anders
> >>
> >>----------
> >>
> >>Charles wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello Anders,
> >>>
> >>>of course spectrum analysis equipment is good equipment, but the costs
> >
> > are
> >
> >>>enormous.
> >>>
> >>>For a private person too high.
> >>>And you must take into account, that those values are not precise.
> >>>Officially, they calculate with a tolerance of + and - 3 dB.
> >>>The meter, the antenna and the cables must be calculated as well, and
> >
> > they
> >
> >>>must be checked and calibrated periodically, which costs also.
> >>>
> >>>There are alternatives, which give about the same information.
> >>>I have found that.
> >>>
> >>>Perhaps after 1 November, another alternative is on the market.
> >>>We will see.
> >>>
> >>>Your dream about DC-3GHz will remain a dream.
> >>>A spectrum analyzer will not measure anything about DC.
> >>>There, one needs other measuring equipment, like a Feldmuehle for
> >
> > electrical
> >
> >>>DC or a magnetometer or a scintillationscounter for magnetic DC.
> >>>
> >>>For AC, I now have a meter, measuring from 5 kHz to 30 kHz and from 30
> >
> > kHz
> >
> >>>to 150 kHz.
> >>>Some sounds I have placed on the website under info.
> >>>
> >>>I was astounded how much signals my completely turned-off televisions
> >
> > set
> >
> >>>was still emitting.
> >>>
> >>>Greetings,
> >>>Charles Claessens
> >>>member Verband Baubiologie
> >>>www.milieuziektes.nl
> >>>www.hetbitje.nl
> >>>checked by Norton Antivirus
> >>>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "Anders Eriksson" <
[hidden email]>
> >>>To: <
[hidden email]>
> >>>Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 11:56
> >>>Subject: Re: [eSens] VLF
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Charles,
> >>>>
> >>>>as I see it, it's the only instrument (spectrum analysis equipment)
> >>>>worth using if you are supposed to do serious measurements.
> >>>>If you use a spectrum analyzer and an antenna of good quality you can
> >>>>tell exactly the amount of energy emanating from each source (cellular
> >>>>phone tower, DECT, FM-radio and so on).
> >>>>My dream is to get hold of professional instrumentation for the entire
> >>>>spectrum from DC to lets say at least 50GHz. I'm sure I will fulfill a
> >>>>part (DC-3GHz) of my dream during 2005!
> >>>>
> >>>>As for florescent light: has anyone on the list information of how