Re: Rife, Lakhovsky

Posted by Anders Eriksson on
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/QXCI-SCIO-tp1536123p1536139.html

Hi Marc,

if I get things right, Rife- and Lakhovsky-devices are used at daily
basis around the world. Then it would be very easy to verify the
efficiency of the devices, or have I missed something?

greetings,

Anders Eriksson

Marc Martin wrote:

>>I am as usual asking for scientific proofs, in this case concerning
>>"Both Rife and Lakhovsky were successful in curing cancer and other
>>diseases". I guess there are none!
>
>
> There seems to be a lot of information in books and on the Internet
> about Rife and Lakhovsky. The consensus among many sources is that
> they were able to eliminate cancer. So my question is -- what would
> YOU consider to be scientific proof of events that took place over
> 50 years ago? Would ANYTHING that we could find be considered
> "proof"? I doubt it.
>
> I don't have any personal experiences with Rife technology, but
> I have tried several EMF protection devices which claimed to be
> based on the work of Lakhovsky. I had a quite strong reaction
> to some of these.
>
>
>>And by the way, a negative effect of the "ZAPPER"
>
>
> The "Zapper" is one of the many things I tried several years ago.
> It didn't seem to have any effect on me at all, good or bad.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>