Posted by
charles-2 on
Mar 14, 2004; 11:20pm
URL: https://www.es-forum.com/Interesting-link-and-more-tp1536070p1536090.html
Hello members,
I am sorry, that Wille Borlin did not find here, what he is looking for.
On the other hand, this list is for electrosensible people, who do hope in
finding here solutions for their problems.
It is not important if all equations are right, and if the theories behind
everything match the momentary going ones.
Electrosensibles do not care about that.
They are only interested in working solutions.
Even if they come from the Moon.
As long as they work.
My explanations are not meant to be courses, but only to bring a bit more
understanding about what we are talking here.
Normal civilians do not know what the difference is between low and high
frequencies.
They only know that they get a headache from it.
Most electricians do not know what magnetic fields are!!
They can not measure them.
They only have a Voltmeter, but not a Gauss- or Tesla meter.
Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/http://www.hese-project.orgchecked by Norton Antivirus
----- Original Message -----
From: "WILLE BÖRLIN" <
[hidden email]>
To: <
[hidden email]>; "Cindy Sage" <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 23:07
Subject: Re: [eSens] Interesting link and more...
Marc, Charles
I am well informed about frequency and radiation and don´t need a course
on that.
Why i asked is because the discussion was about mains-line cabling.
These cables has a very limited capacity to spread ( really )
high-frequency signals.
Thats why i want to define what we talk about.
High is relative.
High on mains cables is 1 Mhz.
High in radio and radar has no real limits.
Marc,s attitude is that nothing matters as long as it helps.
Fine.
But it is impossible to spread knowledge this way.
Nobody can draw conclusions if the phenomena is not well specified and
the "cure" equally well described.
Charles try to make these kind of measures even if i doubt a lot of his
conclusions.
My conclusion is that i don´t get any knowledge from this list, only a
lot of mails................
To be to nosy and curious also irritates others which is an unnecessary
waste of energy.
I will therefore leave the list.
Thank you for you time gentlemen.
Wille Borlin
SWEDEN
Marc Martin wrote:
>>When you write about high-frequency noise in connection with power lines.
>>What do you consider to be high-frequency?
>>
>>
>
>On this subject, I only repeat the literature which comes with the
>products. However, I refer to products which had a clear, repeatable, and
>dramatic impact on my health and ability to tolerate EMF, which is the only
>thing which is important to me. I don't really care what the frequencies
>are. I just care that I am able to tolerate them!
>
>
>
>>On the subject of chi i don´t no first thing, which i admitt, but
>>because it is old it does not have to work.
>>It is quite boring to hear that something is old and hence is beyond
>>critizism.
>>
>>
>
>Well, of course. But again, I only mention this because I have tried it,
>and it has worked for me. There is also an energy healing performed by
>practitioners called "Reiki". This also claims to use "chi". This is also
>pretty popular these days, but of course, being popular does not mean that
>it works. However, I have paid for some sessions in this, and could feel
>the energy during the sessions. And what I felt is exactly the same as
>what I feel when using the Springlife polarizers. So my conclusion is that
>what I'm feeling is the effects of "chi". (and the Springlife polarizers
>are a cheaper alternative to Reiki, as going to a Reiki practitioner costs
>$60 for an hour of chi, while a $90 Springlife Polarizer will provide you
>with years of it -- well, at least 6 months worth, which is how long I've
>had them... :-)
>
>Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links