>>When you write about high-frequency noise in connection with power lines.
>>What do you consider to be high-frequency?
>>    
>>
>
>On this subject, I only repeat the literature which comes with the
>products. However, I refer to products which had a clear, repeatable, and
>dramatic impact on my health and ability to tolerate EMF, which is the only
>thing which is important to me. I don't really care what the frequencies
>are. I just care that I am able to tolerate them!
>
>  
>
>>On the subject of chi i don´t no first thing, which i admitt, but
>>because it is old it does not have to work.
>>It is quite boring to hear that something is old and hence is beyond
>>critizism.
>>    
>>
>
>Well, of course. But again, I only mention this because I have tried it,
>and it has worked for me. There is also an energy healing performed by
>practitioners called "Reiki". This also claims to use "chi". This is also
>pretty popular these days, but of course, being popular does not mean that
>it works. However, I have paid for some sessions in this, and could feel
>the energy during the sessions. And what I felt is exactly the same as
>what I feel when using the Springlife polarizers. So my conclusion is that
>what I'm feeling is the effects of "chi". (and the Springlife polarizers
>are a cheaper alternative to Reiki, as going to a Reiki practitioner costs
>$60 for an hour of chi, while a $90 Springlife Polarizer will provide you
>with years of it -- well, at least 6 months worth, which is how long I've
>had them... :-)
>
>Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>