> Hello Anders Eriksson,
>
> I thought that I answered that in my posting of 01-03-2004.
> Addressed to Wille Borlin in this eSens group.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> http://members.rott.chello.nl/cclaessens/
> http://www.hese-project.org
> checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anders Eriksson" <[hidden email]>
> To: <[hidden email]>; "WILLE BÖRLIN"
> <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:20
> Subject: [eSens] Re:[eSense] windows
>
>
>
>>Hi Charles,
>>
>>I am the suspicious one living in the shielded room!
>>I am quite sure that if I had used "New Age stuff" as you and others in
>>this list suggest for everyone who asks, then I probably wouldn't be
>>here today (literally)!
>>
>>I am still waiting for your answer/justificaton of your earlier
>>statements that Wille Borlin commented, see below: (tagged "<>")
>>
>>Wille Borlin wrote:
>> >>>
>>Well Charles.
>>
>>I think we have some different approaches and i don´t think we can get
>>much closer.
>>Obviously the object must be to kill incoming radiation completely,
>>always chase for the stars.............
>>So why not always choose the best?
>>
>>My friends cage has nothing to do with what was radiating ten years ago,
>>it was so well planned that it is still state of the art,
>> since the basic physics concerning radiation has not changed.
>>
>><>Finally you say that the paint has to be grounded.
>>Grounding has absolutely no effect in medium and high-frequency shielding.
>>Either you have a good shield or not.
>>
>>Which is a little mysterious when you say;
>>
>><>"But never, all the walls, ceiling and floor should be shielded.
>>Always leave something open."
>>
>>Why ?
>>If you leave one sector open it may enhance the effects of radiation so
>>once again, what do you mean?
>>
>>Wille Borlin
>>SWEDEN
>><<<
>>
>>greetings,
>>
>>Anders Eriksson
>>SWEDEN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>