|
|
about 5 years ago, i decided to do practical , not pretentiously
scientific, tests on something that not everyone can afford to do. That
is, what computer set-ups are least troublesome from standpoint of
biosensitivity.
one huge ,overarching result is processor clock speed; the faster the
procssor the less the problem with a dramatic change at 860 to 875 mhz.
i only tested intel and via processors. by far the worst offender was
celeron and least obnoxious per given frequency was the low power
consumption via processors. best was the special low wattage xeon 1.6
mhz LV which is similar to a mobile or notebook cpu
obvious implications- low freq (0 to 1000 hz) modulations of low RF
(50khz-10mhz) are most damaging and increase more than linearly with
emitted power.
what U need: low power low voltage high speed cpu- in other words a high
performance, power efficient cpu reduces harmful emissions THOUGH ALL
SYSTEM COMPONENTS even mouse, keyboard,FANS, and crt- which are theprime
troublemakers.
the most practically useful detector frequency is about 500khz, this
gives an all-around indication of total bio impact. in the US, an am
radio tuned to minimum freq works perfectly- voume must be at maximum.
if your cpu has enough of a speed cushion, it can be UNDERCLOCKED to
greatly reduce problems by greatly reducing power consumption/rf
emissions
dual xeons are best for agiven clock speed because there is almost no
bioactive ELF "stutter" when cpu is under morethan minimum (5%!) load.
i thank randolf for indirectly pointing me to this site.
ken thomas
PS ulrich warnke's work is very expensive in english but very useful. i
had a 1981 symposium which cost almost $200 which i could not have had
use of if i had to buy it myself.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Locked
