smart meter test #1

  Thanks to everyone for their comments. What can we say has been
learned from this thread?

1. The HF35C is not the ideal test instrument. We need something that
gives an integrated dosage over a 24 hour period. The units would be
something like microwatts per square meter times seconds of operation
per day. I suspect that no such instrument exists.

2. It is true that I have assumed that symptoms are proportional to the
above mentioned dosage. I realize that dosage may have nothing to do
with symptoms, but rather by the information contained within the
signal. Symptoms might also be caused by other factors, such as Tesla
longitudinal waves, for which we do not have meters.

3. We sensitives need to try to sort out which parameter does the most
damage (frequency, signal strength, data pattern, etc.) For that we need
to be as precise as possible when reporting symptoms. I tested an Elster
electric meter, type R2S, as stated on the face of the meter. I think it
operates in the 900 MHz cell phone band, using cell phone technology. If
a different meter causes worse symptoms, then we can compare meters and
perhaps find the cause (or one of the causes) of our sensitivity.

Gary Johnson

Hello Gary,

you did not read my posting.

1. For measuring what you want to do, you do need another type, like the HF58B or the HF59B.
They do have a setting *Spitzenwert halten*, which means that the remeber the highest value and keep that on the display.
There is also available a special logger, which remembers all values encountered in the given time.

3. Those parameters you cannot sort out.
They are very different for eacht type of electrosensitives.
And each electrosensitive does react differently to other different sources.
But the main sources are hard to measure.
They are mostly between 1 Hz and ca. 10 MHz.

I am able to measure the influence of those frequencies directly on the body of persons.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Gary Johnson
  To: [hidden email]
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:48 PM
  Subject: [eSens] smart meter test #1


    Thanks to everyone for their comments. What can we say has been
  learned from this thread?

  1. The HF35C is not the ideal test instrument. We need something that
  gives an integrated dosage over a 24 hour period. The units would be
  something like microwatts per square meter times seconds of operation
  per day. I suspect that no such instrument exists.

  2. It is true that I have assumed that symptoms are proportional to the
  above mentioned dosage. I realize that dosage may have nothing to do
  with symptoms, but rather by the information contained within the
  signal. Symptoms might also be caused by other factors, such as Tesla
  longitudinal waves, for which we do not have meters.

  3. We sensitives need to try to sort out which parameter does the most
  damage (frequency, signal strength, data pattern, etc.) For that we need
  to be as precise as possible when reporting symptoms. I tested an Elster
  electric meter, type R2S, as stated on the face of the meter. I think it
  operates in the 900 MHz cell phone band, using cell phone technology. If
  a different meter causes worse symptoms, then we can compare meters and
  perhaps find the cause (or one of the causes) of our sensitivity.

  Gary Johnson


  ------------------------------------

  Yahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]