response to Marc re. metering

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

response to Marc re. metering

SArjuna

> Marc wrote:
> I own several different filters that are supposed to clean up the
> power lines.  I have verified that these do indeed
> do *something*, as I can feel the difference when they are plugged
> in and when they are not.  And yet, the Graham Stetzer meter
> registers no difference when these things are plugged in.  Of
> course, the meter registers a difference when the Graham Stetzer
> filters are plugged in, but that's the only filter which
> has any effect on that meter.
>
> Then the GS filters are the only ones that are removing the harmful
frequencies.


> So it's just yet another case when my perceived reactions have
> absolutely nothing to do with what the meter says (which has
> been the case with every meter I've tried in the past)
>
> Marc, this is exactly why I depend on meters. I want to be able to
know if the remediation I have done has made a difference in the actual frequency
or field present, that I am being exposed to. Since the research is
showing clearly that the high frequencies cause health problems, I simply don't want
to expose myself to them, whether I can personally notice anything or not.
THE EFFECTS OF ALL FORMS OF RADIATION ARE CUMULATIVE. This is
important to keep in mind when choosing what gizmos or techniques on wants to depend
upon to protect their health. Living in a home where the wiring is
broadcasting RF is like living in a microwave oven set way low. You may not feel
anything, but eventually the results will be there.
Regards,
Shivani


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: response to Marc re. metering

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Then the GS filters are the only ones that are removing the harmful
> frequencies.
> > Marc, this is exactly why I depend on meters.

What is the point in depending on meters when their results
are useless? If the meters all say that my LCD monitor is
emitting zero radiation, yet I can't stand being in front
of it for 5 minutes, then the "zero" reading is useless.

Or I can lower the reading on my Graham Stetzer meter using
Graham Stetzer filters, only to be rewarded with a piercing
headache and being incapacitated.

I think you are fooling yourself depending on meter
readings. The damage is still being done, and you are
blissfully unaware of it.

There are many researchers out there that believe that
the biologically harmful component of electromagnetic
radiation is something that cannot be measured by ANY
meter. I think that Charles on this list believes this,
and he owns more meters than anyone on Earth. :-)

There are people who also determine the harmfulness
of EMF using a person as a meter, either
by having an electrically sensitive person describe
what they are feeling, or by measuring their muscle
strength using muscle testing, or the resistivity
in their meridians via EAV testing. This sort
of testin is the only testing that provides any
"readings" which correlate with my symptoms.

Marc