reply to Mark re. Quantum Pro

> > However, if the QP does what they claim it does, this would be
> > clearly demonstrated by before-and-after oscilloscope waveforms.
> > It is inexplicable that the QP people do not provide this - if
> > in fact the QP does create one continuous waveform.
>
> Does Quantum Products really say anywhere that they create
> one continuous waveform? They talk a lot about signal-to-noise
> ratio, but I don't think that's the same thing.
>
> The folks at Quantum Products don't seem to think the same way
> you do. They do not consider everything in the world as operating
> at one continuos 60hz waveform. They see that there are computer
> chips operating in the Gigahertz range. They see stereo systems
> working in the Kilohertz range. They see that there are all
> sorts of frequencies in our environment, and ALL of these
> frequencies have noise in them. And by using their products, they
> can reduce the noise throughout the entire spectrum.
>
> But frankly, I agree with you that their products are poorly
> described and poorly marketed. I thinks the main guy behind
> the company is a physicist/electronics engineer/researcher,
> and not very good at marketing. The main guy behind the
> company QuantumQRT.com used to be the marketing guy for
> Quantum Products, and you can see that these products
> are more credibly marketed(but in my experience with both
> lines, the products at QuantumProducts.com are more
> people-friendly)
>
> > I have read your comments about how many things you
> > have purchased that did not help. Don't you agree that it would be
> > good for product makers to offer proof of their claims about
> > what their products actually do?
>
> Frankly, I've read the studies that Quantum Products has
> done and read the testimonial plus used them myself, and
> consider that it has reached my threshold of "proof" already.
> However, I'm sure that I've read stuff that you haven't,
> and I probably have a lower threshold of proof than you. :-)
> After all, I'm still not convinced that an oscilliscope
> reading is relevant.
>
> Also, proof or not, one can NEVER guarantee that they
> are going to have good results from ANY product. (You
> should see all the cat urine remover products I had to
> try before I found one that worked as advertised)(same
> thing for air purifiers). So there's nothing unique
> about EMF protection devices -- it's "buyer beware"
> no matter what you buy. At least Quantum Products
> appears to have a good money back guarantee.
>
> Also, just because I have good results from these
> products doesn't guarantee that all people with ES will.
> In fact, we've already seen people who have reported
> both ways on Quantum Products. And we've seen people
> report both ways on Stetzer filters as well. Everyone
> is different.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>