|
|
> Drasko wrote:
> That is what I wanted to point out in my numerous replies to Shivani:
> Stetzer (as most of our devices), if effective (what I don't doubt!), have
> no valid explanation. One of the reasons is that we simply don't know
> neither the cause nor the mechanism of impact! In such situation most of the
> attempts to scientifically justify the work of the devices are leading to
> loss of credibility... (That doesn't apply to statistical proofs of
> effectiveness, that involve no much explanation!)
>
Shivani replies:
I have explained this here before. The Graham Stetzer filters short
the high frequencies onto the neutra. not enough voltage
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Locked
