|
|
> Sorry. I accidentally hit a key that sent my message before I had
> finished it.
>
> Drasko wrote:
> That is what I wanted to point out in my numerous replies to Shivani:
> Stetzer (as most of our devices), if effective (what I don't doubt!), have
> no valid explanation. One of the reasons is that we simply don't know
> neither the cause nor the mechanism of impact! In such situation most of the
> attempts to scientifically justify the work of the devices are leading to
> loss of credibility... (That doesn't apply to statistical proofs of
> effectiveness, that involve no much explanation!)
>
Shivani replies:
I am sure I have explained this here before. The GS filters short the
high freqeuncies onto the neutral. There is not enough voltage on the
neutral to broadcast the high frequencies. They are still there, but now they
do not have the power to radiate out into the living space.
The change is easily observed using an oscilloscope. First you take
a reading of the unfiltered current in any circuit of a building, having
filtered out the 60 Hz so that whatever remains is the undesired frequencies.
You can clearly see these waveforms on the oscilloscope. ( If you would like
to see what they look like, go to www.electricalpollution.com/.) Then you
begin to install GS filters while observing the waveform on the oscilloscope.
You will see, with each filter installed, less and less of the damaging high
frequencies.
The Stetzerizer meter is an inexpensive meter designed to indicate the
amount of high frequency pollution present in any circuit, so that people do
not need to own or know how to use an oscilloscope. It gives a digital
readout instead of showing the waveform.
Anyone wanting to know more can read the information at
www.stetzerelectric.com. The filters make a measurable difference in the frequencies
present in the fields of our living spaces. I invite Drasko to prove otherwise
before he makes any more unfounded remarks.
Please note that I do not read the eSens list regularly or completely,
as I simply do not have time. If anyone wants to be sure to receive a
response from me, I invite him/her to contact me personally.
Regards,
Shivani
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
Locked
