reply to Charles re. meter

> Charles, you wrote:
> "The mentioned meter only detects hf radiation from mobile phone masts, etc.
> Not the stuff we find in household appliances; there we need other meters."
>
Shivani replies:
Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the Multidetector ll
Profi, not their RF meter. The names are too similar.
At http://www.electrosmog.com/ the following info. is found in the
descripton of the Multidetector ll Profi:

Measurement of electrical fields in 4 extremely sensitive measuring ranges
0,1 - 1 V/m
1 - 10 V/m
10 - 100 V/m
100 - 1.000 V/m
Best resolution: 0,1 V/m

Measuring of magnetic fields in 4 extremely sensitive measuring ranges:
1 - 10 nT (0,01mG - 0,1mG)
10 - 100 nT (0,1mG - 1mG)
100 - 1.000 nT (1mG - 10mG)
1.000 - 10.000 nT (10mG - 100mG)

Best resolution:
1 nT
Frequency Range 1:
10 - 500 Hz
Frequency Range 2:
500 - 100.000 Hz

This dectector has two frequency ranges. The second one will detect
the electrical pollution frequencies in household current, and also clearly
distinguish it from 50 or 60 Hz. The main frequency of this pollution is 25
kHz, which is 25,000 Hz.
Also, this detector at about $100 is affordable by the general public.
If anyone knows of another meter under $100 that is sensitive down to 1
volt per meter with a range at least up to 30 kHz, please post a message about
it.
This kind of meter is a "must" for identifying the high-frequency
electrical fields in our living spaces that result from electrical pollution.
These fields will be found in places one would not usually expect to find
electrical fields, such as on all-wood furniture, and ES people will continue to be
unwittingly exposed until they check their entire home with such a meter.
Looking at the picture of this meter, I think one could place it in a
plastic bag into the water from their shower or sinks to see if these contain
high frequencies. I will let you know when I get the one I ordered.

Anyway, Charles, would you please elucidate what you meant when you said
that "The HF Detektor II Profi was good at that moment (2 years ago), but
nowadays an antiquity."

Regards,
Shivani


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello Shivani,

the Multidetector ll Profi is what we call *a cat in the bag*.
It measures only low frequencies.
But it does not meet their own specifications.

The HF Detektor II Profi is a meter for high frequencies, which is quite
different.
It is now antique.
The successor is now the Spectran, but that is also a meter which does not
meet the given specifications.

And regarding the Stetzerizer.
I measured in the filter, which was plugged into the wall socket.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus






----- Original Message -----
From: <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 21:29
Subject: [eSens] reply to Charles re. meter


> > Charles, you wrote:
> > "The mentioned meter only detects hf radiation from mobile phone masts,
etc.
> > Not the stuff we find in household appliances; there we need other
meters." clearly
> distinguish it from 50 or 60 Hz. The main frequency of this pollution
is 25
> kHz, which is 25,000 Hz.
> Also, this detector at about $100 is affordable by the general
public.
> If anyone knows of another meter under $100 that is sensitive down to
1
> volt per meter with a range at least up to 30 kHz, please post a message
about
> it.
> This kind of meter is a "must" for identifying the high-frequency
> electrical fields in our living spaces that result from electrical
pollution.
> These fields will be found in places one would not usually expect to find
> electrical fields, such as on all-wood furniture, and ES people will
continue to be
> unwittingly exposed until they check their entire home with such a meter.
> Looking at the picture of this meter, I think one could place it in a
> plastic bag into the water from their shower or sinks to see if these
contain
> high frequencies. I will let you know when I get the one I ordered.
>
> Anyway, Charles, would you please elucidate what you meant when you
said