reply to Cara re. grounding

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

reply to Cara re. grounding

SArjuna
> Cara wrote:
> What is not clear to me from your post, Shivani, is whether the same
> patch of earth can be sometimes safe for grounding, and sometimes
> not. We use the same patch of earth all the time (right outside our
> bedroom window) -- have never moved the grounding rods. In theory, we
> could follow your directions and test that entire area -- but if the
> flow of electrical current moves from day to day (or hour to hour, or
> varies according to moisture content in the ground), that means we
> would need to test constantly -- because a piece of earth that tests
> well one day could be full of toxic energy the next...?
>
You have brought up some very good points! Yes, the ground being
moister/dryer could cause the currents to flow differently. As the loads on the
lines can change a lot as well, that could also create differences in the
ground currents. Perhaps there are other factors that could as well.
Testing the area sometime would give you a general idea what is in that
spot, at least. If you find current there you would know to avoid that area.
If you test, remember that any current at all is going to be harmful if it
contains the health-damaging high frequencies. PCS codes allow a certain
amount of voltage in your yard, but are still pretending that the frequency is
meaningless.
The safe rule of thumb that I have learned is not to use the earth to
ground anything, but to use other methods. (People have made themselves very,
very ill sleeping in grounded Faraday nets.)
At the least, it would be good to avoid the area on the side where your
power main comes in, and where your house grounding rods are, as there will
surely be ground current there.
>
>
Cara wrote:
> Just trying to get clear on the implications of your post. If I
> understand you correctly, the only "safe" alternative to grounding to
> the earth would be to stand in an Epsom salt bath. But again, based
> on your description I wasn't sure if you meant the salt bath had to
> be set on an area of the ground which had been recently tested (as
> not being in an EM field). Is this correct?
>
> The salt bath can be right in your house. This is why it is so handy.
You need to set it in an area where no electrical field is present.
Most people use magnetic field meters, but there are elecric fields many places
where there is no magnetic field at all, and these electrical fields have
frequency. You need a sensitive electric field meter, one that can actually
register a 2 or 2 volts per meter field.
Regards,
Shivani



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]