re. reply to Marc

Marc wrote:
> Certainly some
> avoidance & fixing wiring errors or faulty electronics may be required
> or helpful, but that will often only take you so far in your recovery.
> The rest has to come from improving one's overall health.
>
I agree absolutely. I was objecting solely to the idea that
responsibility for the health effects of any kind of pollution rests more on those
damaged by it than by those creating it.
In order to recover, the indiviual must take great responsibility and
initiative. However, those who are creating the harmful pollution must be
held fully accountable as well. (In our dreams, presently.)
Regards,
Shivani


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I believe the opposite. That diet can only take a person so far, and
then environmental factors need to be addressed, particularly with
very damaged persons.

Even as a healthy person, not only would i not own a DECT, but i
would not want to live or work anywhere near one, ie, below or above
one, same goes with masts. So even as a 'healthy' person my life
would be greatly compromised by this technology.

I believe, but have not yet proved, that microwave RF CAUSES the gut
dysbiosis that triggers other sensitivities. My gut feeling is that
if i were to move to some remote area, away from the MW RF i am
bombarded with 24/7 my sugar cravings would be greatly reduced and my
diet would normalise. I might even be able to ENJOY alcohol again.  
I am convinced that if the wireless technology disappeared i would be
virtually normal. What i am saying is that the fundamental problem
is not ME but the environment i am living in. I will only cut out
every single thing that i find pleasureable in my diet as an absolute
last resort, when there REALLY is nowhere left to hide.  

Regarding the harmful effects of MW RF. Marc talks of a
normal 'healthy person'. I'm not sure what one of those is.  
Everyone i know either drinks, eats, smokes, works or socialises too
much, so must all have severe stresses on their systems. But there
are definitely ppl, like my mum, who seem to have very strong
constitutions.

I totally believe that at the current levels the strongest ppl in our
society will be/ARE BEING affected by MW RF, possibly even more
dramatically than we are, they just haven't figured out that MW RF is
the cause. (Look at our very own Prime Minister, strange heart
murmurs, and hes not an old man.) It is not possible to be subjected
to the levels that the average person is exposed to now and to remain
healthy for many years. But maybe i'll eventually have to eat my
words. Will have to see what happens over the next 5 or 10 years.

--- In [hidden email], SArjuna@a... wrote:
>
>
> Marc wrote:
> > Certainly some
> > avoidance & fixing wiring errors or faulty electronics may be
required
> > or helpful, but that will often only take you so far in your
recovery.
> > The rest has to come from improving one's overall health.
> >
> I agree absolutely. I was objecting solely to the idea that
> responsibility for the health effects of any kind of pollution
rests more on those
> damaged by it than by those creating it.
> In order to recover, the indiviual must take great
responsibility and
> initiative. However, those who are creating the harmful
pollution must be
> held fully accountable as well. (In our dreams, presently.)
> Regards,
> Shivani
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>