re. Vinny's remarks

Classic

List

Threaded

1 message

SArjuna

re. Vinny's remarks

> Vinny wrote:
> I note with a bit of concern that the poster below cc'ed two list
> non-list-members (the addresses were: walkingthe@asianavewalking and
> Dave@stetzerelectriDave@) on her post sent to the list; said post to
> list included portions of a previous post sent to the list group by Charles.
>
>
Shivani replies:
The first e-address is that of Randolf, whose question about filters I
was responding to. His post had appeared here on the list, so he must be a
member.
The second e-address is that of Dave Stetzer. It seems to me that if
people are posting inaccurate negative remarks about his products that he
should be aware of it.

Vinny wrote:

> Such an act is often considered on many list groups to be a
> major violation of list rules and of web etiquette unless the sender
> (in this case, [hidden email]) had received exlicit permission to do
> so from the list owner and from the list member whose post she had
> reproduced. In fact, such actions result in immediate banning on my
> own list groups (although I am not necessarily advocating that the
> list owner here should take the same actions...) In fact, there have
> been similar cases recounted on the web which have resulted in civil
> suits and civil judgements due to copyright violation and violation of
> privacy.
>
> Shivani replies:
> Regarding quoting a member to a nonmember (about the nonmember's

product) this particular situation appears to me to be a bit of a tempest in a
teapot. Yet of course you are correct. This is the age of litigation.
I will suggest to Dave that he become a member of this group forthwith.
He does not have time to read all the posts, that is for sure. This is
why I have been trying to respond to questions and misinformation about the
Stetzer filters here. So that it would get done.
Someone might also sue a person who makes false negative remarks about
ones products. Dave has never so far sued over a thoughtlessly-repeated bit
of misinformation, but it sure does get his dander up. (Now, why was Vinny
not concerned about unsubstantiated remarks being made about someone's
product, I wonder?)

Vinny wrote:

> I am also concerned about the accuracy/veracity of a number of
> statements made by the same author ([hidden email]) in this and
> recent posts, wherein she presents her private and often very unique
> opinions as established fact rather than as her own opinions (I have
> seen several other list members here exhibit the same behavior); one
> example is her recent comments regarding skin effect and
> high-frequency noise currents generated along AC power lines, where I
> believe that she has assigned some very unique personal
> interpretations to skin effect phenomena and high-frequency noise
> currrents on AC lines.
>

Shivani replies:
"Accuracy" and "veracity" are two very different matters. Vinny is
concerned, if he knows the meaning of these two words, not only about whether my
information is correct, but about whether I am lying or not. My, my.
My statements re. skin effect are based on what I have been taught by
Dr. Martin Graham of UC Berkeley, as well as by Dave Stetzer. If Vinny wishes
to ask a specific question or make a specific remark regarding this, I will be
glad (with Vinny's permission, of course) to pass it along to Dr. Graham for
his response.
The phenomena of electrical pollution of electric-utility provided
electricity is well-documented. If Vinny has questions about that after reading
the material provided on my web site and those listed on the Resource page
there, let him please be specific.

> Vinny wrote:
> I personally feel that this poster is entitled
> to her own opinions even if I disagree with some of them radically,
> but it might serve the needs of list members better if she were to
> present them as her own opinions rather than as established fact.
>
> Shivani responds:
It is impossible to respond to such an unspecific remark. If Vinny
wishes to have a meaningful conversation, let him please be specific about what
he objects to.

Regards,
Shivani Arjuna
www.LifeEnergies.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]