re. Quantum Pro

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

re. Quantum Pro

SArjuna

Here is what they say the Quantum Pro does:
    
"When you plug the Quantum Pro™ in any electrical outlet in your home,

> this one small appliance, using the principle of constructive
> interference, coordinates the entire flow of the electrical currents
> and* transforms your electricity into one coherent wave.*
> Your electricity fluctuates back and forth at sixty (or in some cases
> fifty) cycles per second. The Quantum Pro™, acting like a conductor,
> is the* intelligent time keeper* who keeps the electricity flowing in
> perfect harmony to create a beautifully tuned-up system inside the
> walls of your home.
> Now all your appliances flow together to create greater harmony in
> your home. And it’s all coordinated automatically by one small
> appliance that doesn’t do anything but help all the others be more
> coherent. Now you feel better and get things done more easily."


I sent that quote to an electrical power quality expert, who replied:
"I personally do not see how this is possible.  I would like themto
produce waveforms of what is on the lines before the use of their device
without the 50 or 60 cycle and then after their device is plugged in. 
Then we all wll know if it is BS or fact."

If the Quantum Pro somehow converts all the various frequencies that
constitute electrical pollution into one continuous wave, then the measurable
result will be just that, just one wave, of one frequency. That would be60
Hz. in the US.
Their Web site provides no such oscilloscope waveform, though, just
words.
I notice that makers of products supposed to somehow "make it better"
use phrases like "polarize the current," "harmonize the current," etcetera.  
These phrases have no technical meaning whatsoever.    
Has anyone on this list checked with an oscilloscope the waveform on the
line after the Quantum Pro is plugged in?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: re. Quantum Pro

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I sent that quote to an electrical power quality expert, who replied:
> "I personally do not see how this is possible. I would like them to
> produce waveforms of what is on the lines before the use of their device
> without the 50 or 60 cycle and then after their device is plugged in.
> Then we all wll know if it is BS or fact."

You can be as skeptical as you like, but I can verify that I get the
same
health benefits from the Quantum Pro that you claim the Stetzer filters
provide. And I get this from ONE item plugged into ONE outlet.

Quantum Products has done various studies showing large improvements in
signal-to-noise ratio, but I do not know how this relates to an
oscilliscope reading. The use of the Quantum Pro does not register on
the Stetzerizer meter, but what the Stetzerizer meter is measuring
is rather limited (RF noise less than 100 khz?). Another company using
similar technology (QuantumQRT.com) has received numerous good reviews
from audiophiles and videophiles, all claiming that it improves the
fidelity of their high-end audio/video systems. I myself noticed
an improvement in both the picture quality on my TV and computer
before I learned that this was one of the applications that this
technology was being used for.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: re. Quantum Pro

Marc Martin
Administrator
Also, on the subject of signal-to-noise ratio, Margi
Wilson of Quantum Products once sent me the following
white paper:

http://ufoseries.com/test.pdf

I don't know why she sent this to me, but in case
anyone is interested, it shows an experiment they
performed which indicated an increase in the
signal-to-noise ratio.

But really, I don't buy these things to get
increased signal-to-noise ratios. I also don't
buy them to get a certain oscilliscope reading
or Stetzerizer meter reading. I buy them to
feel better. One shouldn't lose sight of this.
The oscilliscope reading is not the ultimate
measurement. Improved health is.

Marc