question for Galileo
Locked
 
|
> You wrote:
do we know which vehicles have them?
> There are other sources of vehicle EMF less well known. Under dash > Bluetooth transmitters for detecting the presence of child seats in > the > front. The Micro-Alert ($90?)should show these up but as it chirps > (it > does not have a scale) it will not give you any values. Imobiliser > transmitters which interrogate a transponder chip in the key and air- > bag systems once armed produce a constant signal (at 200Hz I > believe). > If for any reason the signal is lost (as in an accident when the > impact > sensors break contact) then the airbags deploy. > > Then there is RF remote central locking (Some systems use Infra-Red) > Anti collision systems use radar beamed at the car in from (Top end > Cadilacs, Mercs, BMW's and others have these) and the newer halogen > headlights too I believe put out some kind of EMR forwards. Satellite > tracking - the little stubby ariel above the rear window or cell- > phone antennas (some through the glass). > > This is bad news. Where can we learn more about these things? How When I accompany my husband in his Ford Explorer I sit in the back, as fields are lower there. (He jokes about driving Miss Daisy.) His car has lots more "bells & whistles" than my Subaru Legacy Brighton. Regards, Shivani [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
Re EMFs In Automobiles/Cars
Shivani wrote: This is bad news. Where can we learn more about these things? How do we know which vehicles have them? When I accompany my husband in his Ford Explorer I sit in the back, as fields are lower there. (He jokes about driving Miss Daisy.) His car has lots more "bells & whistles" than my Subaru Legacy Brighton. Shivani, Probably as good a place as any to find out about automotive EMF's is this forum. If anyone knowns of other sources, please post them. Automobiles use many facets of electromagnetism in order to work. Often this produces electromagnetic by-products, some of which are close enough to affect sensitive individuals. It must contribute something to driver's and passenge's total 'toxic burden'. In vehicles people tend to sit for long periods in the same position. Also travelling is often a regular activity (commuting). Generally the lowest magnetic and electric fields are in the centre rear seat. Billions of people drive every day so it is something most people can tollerate. For the EHS, 'vehicle exposure' may however be a source of EMF that they regularly encounter. Galileo |
Administrator
|
> Billions of people drive every day so it is something most people can
> tollerate. For the EHS, 'vehicle exposure' may however be a source of > EMF that they regularly encounter. Certainly there are ES people that cannot tolerate certain cars. Of course, these people could always try a "classic" car -- I see cars made in the 1960's and 1970's still driving today, and I suspect that older cars are easier to tolerate than newer cars. Or at least cars with fewer fancier features. The cheapest option is probably to try a few EMF protection devices and see if they help. That is what I use in my car (Springlife Lifeforce Pendant, Quantum Companion). Although I see lately that my main source of Springlife products, bioharmonics.com, has been offline for some reason (?) Marc |
|
|
When Sue started getting problems travelling by car, we were advised to try
older cars. The culprits are mainly modern "chips", electronic ignition systems and general electrical gizmos like sound system speakers and central locking. Spark plugs aren't so important, though a diesel can be even better. We found a couple of friends' old cars were better than our more modern ones, and eventually got a 16-year old Peugeot 205, with carburettor, points, no fancy electrics. Sue now travels around in this regularly (usually as a passenger, with a metallised headnet on, grounded to the seat in front) and suffers much less than in more modern cars. In fact we have done over 4000 miles in this car since July. This car and the special low-emf phone we got from Sweden have been the two biggest pluses in helping to give Sue a more normal life again. Ian _____ From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Marc Martin Sent: 25 November 2005 17:34 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: question for Galileo > Billions of people drive every day so it is something most people can > tollerate. For the EHS, 'vehicle exposure' may however be a source of > EMF that they regularly encounter. Certainly there are ES people that cannot tolerate certain cars. Of course, these people could always try a "classic" car -- I see cars made in the 1960's and 1970's still driving today, and I suspect that older cars are easier to tolerate than newer cars. Or at least cars with fewer fancier features. The cheapest option is probably to try a few EMF protection devices and see if they help. That is what I use in my car (Springlife Lifeforce Pendant, Quantum Companion). Although I see lately that my main source of Springlife products, bioharmonics.com, has been offline for some reason (?) Marc _____ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS * Visit your group "eSens <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens> " on the web. * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=Unsubscribe> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service. _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
«
Return to ES
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |