protection device interaction

Marc, and others, what do you say regarding my contemplation:

I have some number of various protection devices that I had tested, and, unlikely Marc, I tend to forget about them after testing, so they are mostly in one box, but also could be found all around the house... Those are not only commercial devices, my small collection includes different crystals, hand made pyramid, one Russian Blue cat (live) that people believe it helps, plants, sedge, etc... Some of them I find effective, but there are more that I haven't found effective...

My issue is that although I might sit rather near to a device, just when I put it on myself, it makes rather big difference. I mean - the difference in distance is uncomparable to difference in effect! Some would say it is an obvious example of placebo effect, but I am postive the effect is real (proven by some blind tests). Just I *might* think of attributing effect to some "communication" i.e. focusing on the device, that gives some feedback in return... Another explanation could be that our biofield (or whatever) needs close connection with the device to interact...
Interestingly, I never noticed effect of devices that claim to "cover" all the house...

Anyway I would appreciate any your reflections to this issue..

Drasko

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello Drasko,

some devices, like the BioProtect card, need the irfrared radiation from the
body.

Be aware, that around the body are frequency fields.
I can measure them and my computer program spits out the corresponding aura
colors, with explanations.

Sometimes, I make audio CD's with bioresonance frequencies, which may help
electrosensitive people, also people with MCS.
I once did send such an CD to somebody in Germany. Because he could not
stand a CD player, he wore the CD in a purse on his body.
His electroacupuncturist measured the effect; there was a great difference
with, and without the CD.
He claimed that it helped him.

I do not know why this effect occurred.
Was it my intention in the CD?
Was the body, cq. its aura capable of picking up the frequencies on the CD?

Some time ago, I read the following.
In the USA there were two friends, which were very close to each other.
At a certain moment, their friendship was over, and they snibbled at each
other constantly.
They wondered about this, and came to the conclusion, that this phenomenon
started at the moment they got some free CD's, which contained *devils
music*.
They crushed the CD's and disposed them in the garbage.
from that moment on, they were again best friends.

Beware, I am not superstitious, but do know, that frequencies go around and
around.

Some people do a regression therapy.
They experience things, and see things, clothings, buildings, places, they
could not possibly know of.
But this information is there, somewhere around their body.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.milieuziektes.be
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus


----- Original Message -----
From: "Drasko Cvijovic" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:18
Subject: [eSens] protection device interaction

> My issue is that although I might sit rather near to a device, just when I
> put it on myself, it makes rather big difference.

You may have noticed that with Vinny's prototype devices, he says that the
personal device needs to be ON the body to work -- NEAR the body isn't good
enough. So there must be something special about being ON the body.

I've noticed that in one case -- the Earthcalm resonator -- that it makes
a big difference to be ON the body vs. NEAR the body. However, with the
devices that I more commonly use (Springlife Polarizers, Quantum Products),
there doesn't seem to be anything special about being ON the body -- NEAR
has about the same effect, and the effect gradually drops off with distance.

Marc

Hi folks:

The only reason why I make/made that recommendaton about the smallest
Quantum Coherence device, aka the personal protection device, is that
its range of strongest effect is only a few feet, and thus the
greatest benefit will usually be noticed when wearing it within the
near-biofield, or within about four inches of the skin. For the
larger devices in the Coherent Space Quantum Coherence line, this is
not relevant, due to their far greater range of effect. However,
having said that, one funny story: my wife finds that when she is
really tired at the end of a long day of hiking and driving at
out-of-state sites, she notices that if she is feeling fatigued and
sleepy while at the wheel, she grabs the small area treatment Quantum
Coherence device (I think the model number is something like AUTO-21,
and the range is about 15 feet for strongest effect) from her
backpack on the back seat and places the device near her body, on her
lap. She reports that this seems to have some kind of rejuvenating or
revitalizing effect; I do not notice this effect when I try this trick.

with care,
--Vinny

At 10:11 AM 9/20/2006, you wrote:

Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]

phone 301-694-1249

To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us