more questions for Charles

Charles wrote:
Charles wrote:
> The HF Detektor II Profi is a meter for high frequencies, which is quite
> different. It is now antique.
> The successor is now the Spectran, but that is also a meter which does not
> meet the given specifications.
>
> Shivani replies:
Ther site says the HF Detector ll Profi is new. You say it's an
antique. ??
I do not see any mlention there of the Spectran.

Charles wrote:
> And regarding the Stetzerizer.
> I measured in the filter, which was plugged into the wall socket.
>
> Shivani replies:
That only tells you what was going on in that location in that circuit.
When installing the GS filters, you must check outlets all around the
space you wish to clear of elecrical pollution, and install enough filters in the
right places to get a uniformly low level. (In the US this must be done on
both the A & B circuits.) There are instructions at www.stetzerelectric.com/
What the filters are doing is shorting the high frequencies onto the
neutral, where there is not enough voltage for them to broadcast out into the
living space. One filter simply cannot clear a whole circuit if the incoming
current has 2000 GS units of electrical pollution.
Also, the incoming level of pollution is quite variable. You must be
sure you have enough filters installed to handle the peak level, not just what
may happen to be present the first time you check. This is why it's
important for people to have their own Stetzerizer meter, so they can keep an eye on
the level on an ongoing basis.
For instance, as I have mentioned previously, I was once working on a
circuit in a bakery that had a particlarly high level of pollution, when
suddenly it disappeared. I looked at the clock. 3 pm. A local factory had
just gone off shift, and apparently electronic equipment there had been creating
the high frequencies in the bakery circuit. If I had not arrived and begun
work until after 3 pm, it would have appeared that the bakery needed far
fewer filters than in fact they did.

Regards,
Shivani




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Does anyone in the group have any experience on whether having an X ray
affects your electrosensitivity?



In particular, Sue is supposed to have a panoramic X ray done on her jaw, to
help look at her possible cavitations. We are worried whether that could
trigger further problems (especially after the original cause of Sue's ES
being a scan at 3GHz). On the other hand, if X rays are generally safe and
harmless, it would be very useful for us to know that, as they will be a
major help to the dentist doing the surgery.







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Ian Kemp wrote:
> Does anyone in the group have any experience on whether having an X ray
> affects your electrosensitivity?

X-Rays haven't affected my ES at all, as far as I can tell. And I've
had several in the past several years, including a panoramic dental
X-Ray.

But I suspect that SOMEBODY could have a bad reaction to them, and
admittedly I was worried about my reaction to them.

Marc

X-rays are what made me a lot worse than I was. I received way too
much radiation after a car accident in emergency that left my bones
on fire for 10 days after, and cancer at the heels ever since.

X-rays are far from harmless. Every one you get causes genetic
damage, and the effects are cumulative over your life.

The panoramics, that I've come across are digital some type and not x-
rays. I guess it would be relative to the person if it would bother
them or not. I would never take a full panoramic if it was x-ray
radiation. It does spread, so not just your mouth is getting it.  
Ever notice no one stands near when you're getting them?

I guess you'd have to go with your gut feeling on it, but it seems
most dentists these days take many more than necessary. I've had to
sign that I refused them at times. They do it just to cover their
butts most often.

Sorry I can't give you some positive input, but when it comes to x-
rays, they should be used only when absolutely necessary.

~ Snoshoe

--- In [hidden email], "Ian Kemp" <ianandsue.kemp@u...> wrote:
>
> Does anyone in the group have any experience on whether having an X
ray
> affects your electrosensitivity?
>
>  
>
> In particular, Sue is supposed to have a panoramic X ray done on
her jaw, to
> help look at her possible cavitations. We are worried whether that
could
> trigger further problems (especially after the original cause of
Sue's ES
> being a scan at 3GHz). On the other hand, if X rays are generally
safe and
> harmless, it would be very useful for us to know that, as they will
be a