more info. re. Electrosmog Deteccter

The sensitivity level of the Electrosmog Detecter was chosen most
purposefully. Very few people are as extremely sensitive as Charles, or live in a
remote region as he does. Most people live in urban areas. If the
Detecter were any more sensitive, in many areas it would be sounding everywhere you
went, making it difficult indeed to distinguish safe from unsafe areas.
The official sensitivity tests for the MW1 ES Detector were carried out
in a FCC certified test lab and assessed the field levels using 4 different
professional signal analysers. Over the range 300 MHz to 2500 MHz the
sensitivity to pulsing microwave radiation varied between 0.01 and 0.03 V/m. That
is when you can first hear any pulsing / ampltude modulation. By 0.05 V/m
the sound was well distinct and clear above the background hiss at all mobile
phone and TETRA frequencies.
Even the best equipment (costing $10,000+) labs only claim a 95%
certainty that any field readings are within about +/-3dB (i.e. between 50%and
200% of the reading). The UK NRPB in their Report R321 said 95% certain that
their readings were not more than 2.8 times out from the correct value!
The internal antenna of the Electrosmog Detecter governs the
sensitivity of the MW1. Modified, with an external antenna, it can be made considerably
more sensitive - but it was purposefully chosen nnot to do this. The
Electrosmog Detecter was not designed for folks like Charles. Its creators chose
the 0.01 to 0.04 V/m sensitivity as that is below the level (about 0.05 V/m)
that about 5 studies (listed on the www.sensorypersective.com website) show
that adverse human effects start.
 
In most UK towns and cities it is already very difficult to find areas
where the Electrosmog Detector is quiet. Some ES people do respond to tiny
levels - in which case they will have to live remote from modern civilisation,
or cocoon themslevs in shielding fabric.
 
The makers of the Electrosmog Detecter have been hearing from many
"Establishement" people (including WHO) that it is far TOO sensitive and that they
are scaremongering the general public.
 
You could pay a lot more to get a more sensitive meter, but for most
people such a meter would be less useful. I believe that the sensitivity is
perfect for the vast majority of people.  

I will be ordering some from England in early Nov. so get in touch if
you are interested.

Regards,
Shivani
 


 

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi Shivani,

my Acom has been my constant 'companion' for the past 2 years, but i
feel that my illness has 'outgrown' it. I wish they'd make an Acom
Mark II that starts off where the current Acom finishes, ie that
would register fields from 0.01v/m down to 0.000003v/m. I find it a
little disturbing when i go to a campsite that according to my Acom
is 'all clear' and find that my mobile phone has a perfect 5-bar
reception!! I cannot sleep in such places, i keep waking up every 15
minutes.

I'm sure that different ppl with ES will have different tolerances to
RF and that, hopefully, there are very few of us who require the zero
landscape you refer to. But how can i know how much i can tolerate,
particularly when i am trying to sleep, if i do not have the
necessary information.

best wishes


--- In [hidden email], SArjuna@a... wrote:
>
> The sensitivity level of the Electrosmog Detecter was chosen
most
> purposefully. Very few people are as extremely sensitive as
Charles, or live in a
> remote region as he does. Most people live in urban areas. If
the
> Detecter were any more sensitive, in many areas it would be
sounding everywhere you
> went, making it difficult indeed to distinguish safe from unsafe
areas.
> The official sensitivity tests for the MW1 ES Detector were
carried out
> in a FCC certified test lab and assessed the field levels using 4
different
> professional signal analysers. Over the range 300 MHz to 2500
MHz the
> sensitivity to pulsing microwave radiation varied between 0.01 and
0.03 V/m. That
> is when you can first hear any pulsing / ampltude modulation. By
0.05 V/m
> the sound was well distinct and clear above the background hiss at
all mobile
> phone and TETRA frequencies.
> Even the best equipment (costing $10,000+) labs only claim a
95%
> certainty that any field readings are within about +/-3dB (i.e.
between 50% and
> 200% of the reading). The UK NRPB in their Report R321 said 95%
certain that
> their readings were not more than 2.8 times out from the correct
value!
> The internal antenna of the Electrosmog Detecter governs the
> sensitivity of the MW1. Modified, with an external antenna, it can
be made considerably
> more sensitive - but it was purposefully chosen nnot to do this.  
The
> Electrosmog Detecter was not designed for folks like Charles. Its
creators chose
> the 0.01 to 0.04 V/m sensitivity as that is below the level (about
0.05 V/m)
> that about 5 studies (listed on the www.sensorypersective.com  
website) show
> that adverse human effects start.
>  
> In most UK towns and cities it is already very difficult to
find areas
> where the Electrosmog Detector is quiet. Some ES people do
respond to tiny
> levels - in which case they will have to live remote from modern
civilisation,
> or cocoon themslevs in shielding fabric.
>  
> The makers of the Electrosmog Detecter have been hearing from
many
> "Establishement" people (including WHO) that it is far TOO
sensitive and that they
> are scaremongering the general public.
>  
> You could pay a lot more to get a more sensitive meter, but
for most
> people such a meter would be less useful. I believe that the
sensitivity is
> perfect for the vast majority of people.  
>
> I will be ordering some from England in early Nov. so get in
touch if