hints on the workings of the polarizers!!!

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

hints on the workings of the polarizers!!!

Flavio
hi folks,

while studying about orgonomy (the science of living energy) I got
some hints about why springlife polarizers work.

According with the principles for building an orgone accumulator
(aka living energy accumulator) outlined by the late 20's scientist
Wilhelm Reich, such device should have alternate layers of organic
and metal matter. Organic matter is suppose to attract and hold
chi while metal matter is suppose to attract it too but then repel
it. So the minerals and plant powder inside the polarizers attract
and hold chi while the metal attracts that holding chi and repel it
toward us. Humans, most organic matter unless having some mercury
fillings :), are to attract and hold that energy.

for those interested in further reading the following links,
especially the last two.

Flavio


http://www.hscti.com/index.html#reich 

http://paranormal.about.com/library/weekly/aa032700a.htm 

http://paranormal.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?
site=http://orgone.org/orgonacc00.htm

http://paranormal.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?
site=http://orgone.org/aaintro00.htm 

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: hints on the workings of the polarizers!!!

Marc Martin
Administrator
>while studying about orgonomy (the science of living energy) I got
>some hints about why springlife polarizers work.

I've purchased a few of the organite devices from the anti-chemtrail folks,
and I think these devices have a different feel to them than the Springlife
Polarizers. Perhaps it's the choice of organic materials (kelp versus
resin) and metals (stainless steel versus miscellaneous metals).

Also note that the Springlife velvet pillow probably doesn't have any metal
in it... (but I also haven't tested this one)

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Introduction

ed@newtreatments.org
Hi,

This is my first post, so I'll first write a short introduction.
My name is Ed, I'm 26 years old and I live near the city Utrecht in the Netherlands.
I'm studying computer science at the Utrecht University.

At age 18, I think I started to become more and more sensitive to electrosmog (or electrosmog levels were increasing?).
Classrooms filled with dozens of computers and CRT monitors, plus fluorescent lights and no air circulation (windows couldn't be opened) made me feel really bad.
At age 19 I was diagnosed with crohn's disease which is a chronic inflammation of the intestines.
At age 22 I discovered alternative treatments to treat this disease successfully using a diet.
I then moved from my parent's place from a small village next to Utrecht into an appartment in the city Utrecht at the 4th floor.

That's when all of a sudden I developed a strange calcium "allergy".
Each time I would eat something with calcium, whether it was almonds or brocolli or cheese, I would become extremely sleepy and crash on a couch and would lie there for about two hours before I recovered.
This calcium allergy would disappear instantly when I was in (rural electrosmog-free) France where my parents have a 2nd house.
That's when I started reading about the calcium channels and how electrosmog can upset those channels.

I eventually moved back to my parents' place, just outside Utrecht, and did some electrosmog-cleaning (getting rid of DECT phone primarily).
The calcium allergy was gone then and my "brain-fogs" never re-appeared unless I would go to a place with high electrosmog levels, among which the university is one alas.
I had quite some symptoms that made me think I had CFS/ME, but in the end avoiding electrosmog stopped all those symptoms.

After reading Charles Claessen's online electrosmog magazine, I decided to buy the Aaronia HF-Detektor and the Multidetektor.
When I checked the appartment in Utrecht I used to live, more and more lights would turn on while walking the stairs up to the 4th floor.
In the appartment itself there were several HF-hotspots where all the red LED's would turn on in the "x2 Bereich setting", which means -20 dBm.
I think the radiation originated from the hospital nearby where several antenna's were visible on the roof.

In the end I'm very glad I moved out of that place. The study was going quite poorly.
Back then I did find some kind of remedy for the brain fogs (sluggish mental feeling) in the form of Co-Enzyme Q10 (very, very expensive) but I needed massive doses of that.

In my parents' house I found two rooms with quite low HF-smog levels. At least the HF-Detektor indicates -51 dBm.
One became my bedroom and the other one became the living room and I'm feeling quite good these days.

I am using the bioprotectcard and it sure works for me, although not 100%. At the university it now makes it tolerable to sit under fluorescent lights (which are always on even when the sun is shining).
I still feel awkward in shopping malls (radars for the automatic doors plus cellular phone antenna's I think) and inside some shops I feel miserable.
But the bioprotect card did make a big positive difference for me.

I sure hope the UMTS will be stopped in time, because otherwise I will probably move out of the country.

I have a website on alternative health and it's located at http://www.newtreatments.org .
I've read both books by Robert Becker (Body Electric and Cross Currents). A review of the 1st one can be found at:
http://www.newtreatments.org/doc/WisdomExperience/135

Another book I've read that's somehow related to electrosmog is the book Lights Out by T.S. Wiley with Bent Formby.
It's a very detailled overview of how important our hormones are and how easily they are upset by lights, but hence also by electrosmog.
The short review for that book can be found here:
http://www.newtreatments.org/books.php

I also wrote a short article about how electrosmog and a low-carb (Atkins) diet affect eachother:
http://www.newtreatments.org/doc/WisdomExperience/166

Hmmm.. The "short" introduction turned out to be a bit lengthier than planned, but I think you don't mind.

I also have a question about MRI scanners, but I'll write that in my next post.

Ed,
The Netherlands

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Magnetic Resonance Imaging safe ?

ed@newtreatments.org
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi,

A friend of mine is studying medical computer science and she's now researching how to make more use of MRI scanners.
She conducts experiments in which several MRI scans are made on people.
Two times she MRI-scanned herself, but even though the people in the hospital claim it's a 100% safe technique, she has some reservations and is not convinced it is safe.

I looked up a short paragraph from Robert Beckers' Cross Currents book in which Becker writes:

"My observation is that MRI is most often used not to confirm a
diagnosis or to look for a specific type of lesion following a thorough
physical exam, but rather as a screening test. Frequent justifications
for such overusage are that "something may turn up," and that MRI is a
harmless procedure with no biological effects.

In reality, in an MRI scan the patient is subjected to a very strong DC
(steady) magnetic field, combined with other fields that are
oscillating at radio frequencies. While no one has shown specific harm
to patients, there are sufficient data in the research literature to
indicate that biological effects do occur with these fields. At this
time, I do not believe that anyone can give MRI an unequivocally clean
bill of health."

...

"Again, it comes down to a risk/benefit question. If good medical
practice is followed and a tentative diagnosis is made or a reasonable
localization of a pathology is obtained, then the use of the MRI
technique is well worth the risk. However, the risk involved in its use
as an unfocused screening technique does not appear to be justified."

---

Becker at least states that a safety claim can't ever be made w.r.t. MRI scans.
It also seems that in the hospitals there is no tendency to use the lower magnetic strenghts for the scans.
Magnetic field strenghts are between 1.5 and >12 Tesla.
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1997/AllaReyfman.shtml

HowStuffWorks says ( http://science.howstuffworks.com/question698.htm ):
"The magnets in use today in MRI are in the 0.5-Tesla to 2.0-Tesla range, or 5,000 to 20,000 gauss. Magnetic fields greater than 2 Tesla have not been approved for use in medical imaging, though much more powerful magnets -- up to 60 Tesla -- are used in research. Compared with the Earth's 0.5-gauss magnetic field, you can see how incredibly powerful these magnets are."

This website, http://www.teslasociety.com/mri.htm , states that:
"First, MRI creates a steady state of magnetism within the human body by placing the body in a steady magnetic field.
Second, the MRI stimulates the body with radio waves to change the steady-state orientation of protons.
Third, the MRI machine stops the radio waves and registers the body's electromagnetic transmission.
Fourth, the transmitted signal are used to construct internal images of the body by computerized axial tomography."

If we concentrate on the strong magnetic field alone, would it be comparable to a crane operator who sits next to very strong magnetic fields from the electric engines ?
On this page http://home.wanadoo.nl/henkhemelrijk/mwh/home.htm (in Dutch) one case is described where a crane operator is suffering from electrostress in the form of very tense muscles and also a strong tendency towards aggressiveness.

A big difference ofcourse is that an MRI scan only takes 5 minutes and a crane operator sits in his cockpit for several hours per day.

Here are some questions I have:

* With such high magnetic field strengths, what would be a safe distance for MRI operators ?
* I wonder if someone has more specific details/experience on the safety of MRI scans or the health impact of comparably strong magnetic fields.


Thanks in advance for your reply,


Ed,
The Netherlands

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by ed@newtreatments.org
Thanks for your introduction, Ed. Very interesting!

>That's when all of a sudden I developed a strange calcium "allergy".
>Each time I would eat something with calcium, whether it was almonds
>or >brocolli or cheese, I would become extremely sleepy and crash on a
>couch and >would lie there for about two hours before I recovered.

For me, eating foods high in calcium *helps* my tolerance of EMF. However,
I do recall that many years ago (before I had my metal dental work all
removed), I tried a little "coral calcium" mixed in water. I got terrible
brain fog, fatigue, and loss of short term memory.

However, in retrospect, I think I would consider this a case of "too much
of a good thing". If one is really toxic, and they take something that
mobilizes those toxins into the bloodstream, you will definitely feel
fatigued. I think the solution is to first try doing that same thing in
lesser amounts to see if there is a level which makes you feel better, not
worse.

The more I read about others EMF symptoms and observe my own, the more I
think that the EMF is mobilizing toxins from our cells into our
bloodstream, which is then making us feel bad. Eating foods or supplements
which mobilize these toxins will make us feel even worse, while eating
foods and supplements which bind to these toxins and take them out of our
system safely will make us feel even better. For me, the one supplement
which seems to do this best is something called "Active H-" powder from
www.NewVision.com. I've been taking this (or it's predecessor
"Microhydrin") for the past 3 years. This is a very expensive supplement
($100), but I take it in such small amounts (1/4 scoop taken once a day)
that one bottle lasts 400 days! A cheaper alternative is barley grass
powder (I use Green Magma), and in general sea vegetables are helpful.
Also, I've been reading that foods which high in "good fats" are also
helpful in binding with toxins, and for this I realized that every day I
eat an organic avocado and some olive oil.

And as a longterm solution, a long, slow detoxification program can
gradually get rid of the toxins in your cells so that there isn't much for
the EMF to mobilize, which in the end will make one highly tolerant of EMF.

But again, this is just my *theory*. I could be completely wrong, but this
theory does seem to match my observations of myself and others.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Glenn Coleman
In reply to this post by ed@newtreatments.org
Hi Marc,

I am so amazed with the discoveries you have found to help your ES. Your
theory on how toxins are released by EMF makes so much sense. Especially if
your solutions are based on this theory and are working. It seems that a
very big fact about ES sensitivity is that that there is not just a simple
cure or a box one can turn on to completely rid the problem. It seems to
take a very balanced approach. That is what I am realizing after installing
my Quantum Home, and still having some EMF side effects. As you mentioned
in previous messages, it may take years of detoxification to completely
level out ES sensitivity. My Quantum Home then becomes just one tool to use
to help keep my ES in balance.

I am curious what level of ES sensitivity you are at if you don't use your
SpringLife, after your years of detoxification?

Have you considered writing a book, or creating a website that summarizes
all your approaches? I have learned a huge amount through this group, and
wonder if it would be even more helpful to have all your approaches
summarized on a website? Just a point of view.

Cheers,

Glenn



>From: Marc Martin <[hidden email]>
>Reply-To: [hidden email]
>To: [hidden email]
>Subject: Re: [eSens] Introduction
>Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 07:39:30 -0700
>
>Thanks for your introduction, Ed. Very interesting!
>
> >That's when all of a sudden I developed a strange calcium "allergy".
> >Each time I would eat something with calcium, whether it was almonds
> >or >brocolli or cheese, I would become extremely sleepy and crash on a
> >couch and >would lie there for about two hours before I recovered.
>
>For me, eating foods high in calcium *helps* my tolerance of EMF. However,
>I do recall that many years ago (before I had my metal dental work all
>removed), I tried a little "coral calcium" mixed in water. I got terrible
>brain fog, fatigue, and loss of short term memory.
>
>However, in retrospect, I think I would consider this a case of "too much
>of a good thing". If one is really toxic, and they take something that
>mobilizes those toxins into the bloodstream, you will definitely feel
>fatigued. I think the solution is to first try doing that same thing in
>lesser amounts to see if there is a level which makes you feel better, not
>worse.
>
>The more I read about others EMF symptoms and observe my own, the more I
>think that the EMF is mobilizing toxins from our cells into our
>bloodstream, which is then making us feel bad. Eating foods or supplements
>which mobilize these toxins will make us feel even worse, while eating
>foods and supplements which bind to these toxins and take them out of our
>system safely will make us feel even better. For me, the one supplement
>which seems to do this best is something called "Active H-" powder from
>www.NewVision.com. I've been taking this (or it's predecessor
>"Microhydrin") for the past 3 years. This is a very expensive supplement
>($100), but I take it in such small amounts (1/4 scoop taken once a day)
>that one bottle lasts 400 days! A cheaper alternative is barley grass
>powder (I use Green Magma), and in general sea vegetables are helpful.
>Also, I've been reading that foods which high in "good fats" are also
>helpful in binding with toxins, and for this I realized that every day I
>eat an organic avocado and some olive oil.
>
>And as a longterm solution, a long, slow detoxification program can
>gradually get rid of the toxins in your cells so that there isn't much for
>the EMF to mobilize, which in the end will make one highly tolerant of EMF.
>
>But again, this is just my *theory*. I could be completely wrong, but this
>theory does seem to match my observations of myself and others.
>
>Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

ed@newtreatments.org
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi Marc,

>And as a longterm solution, a long, slow detoxification program can
>gradually get rid of the toxins in your cells so that there isn't much for
>the EMF to mobilize, which in the end will make one highly tolerant of EMF.
>
>But again, this is just my *theory*. I could be completely wrong, but this
>theory does seem to match my observations of myself and others.

I am thinking somewhat in the same direction but slightly different (more below).
I've observed that diet, minerals and other supplements can have a big impact on electrosmog sensitivity.
I'll try to list all relations I think I've experienced:

* Low-carbohydrate diet + calcium rich foods
--> Brain fogs, heart arrythmia, lowered IQ

* Low-carbohydrate diet + high dose of Coenzyme Q10
--> Reduces brain fogs

* 100% raw diet with fruit, raw tuna, beef and egg yolks and lots of raw olive oil
--> Made sensitivity disappear almost completely

The above mentioned diet can be found on www.waisays.com . I wasn't able to continue this diet because my bloodsugar levels became very unstable.

Here is a nice page with information on the negative hydride ion.
http://www.h-minus-ion.org/
Check out the EM-1 in the article which I've used. It does give me more energy, but I'm not sure it reduced electrosmog sensitivity.

To return to the topic of toxins causing ES.
I think electrosmog is bad and unhealthy for each and every living thing on this planet.
I think there is ample evidence that the blood-brain barriers opens, that the calcium channels get upset and that it could also cause the opening of the intestine-blood barrier.
from simple studies which show that rat's brains develop dark spots, I conclude you don't need to be ES to get negative symptoms from electrosmog. (The rats weren't asked if they were ES and I think we can assume they probably weren't all ES) ( http://www.newtreatments.org/doc/WisdomExperience/102 ).

In both ES and non-ES people negative effects *take* place, but ES people can feel the effects immediately because some conditions aggravate the symptoms.
For example: If a person has more than normal calcium levels in his blood (low-carb diet causes this for example) then he will be bothered by HF worse than someone with normal calcium levels.
Blood-brain barriers opens and lets calcium leak into the brain. The calcium channels in the neurons are upset by the electrosmog and allow massive amounts of calcium to enter the neurons. This causes over-excitation and can kill the neuron.
In the appartment where I used to live I also noticed an extreme sensitivity to supplements which contained aspartame and glutamic acid. If I would take one of those, I wouldn't be able to sleep until 6 AM. I think that's the time it took to flush it out of my blood (and hence my brain).
More on excitoxins: http://www.smart-drugs.net/ias-excitotoxins.htm and http://www.dorway.com/blayenn.html .

Something comparable happens to all muscles in the body: Calcium acts as the contract-command while magnesium acts as the release-command.
People with high calcium levels can very easily get heart arrythmia and muscle spasms when they're radiated by HF waves.

But also the pancreas is triggered with calcium. Anything that upsets the calcium levels *will* upset the critical bloodsugar regulation.
If the pancreas starts to pump too much insulin in the blood, a person can get too low bloodsugar levels and vice versa.

And then there is the blood-intestinal barrier. If the intestines become permeable, you can expect symptoms ranging from allergies to toxification from the rotting food in the intestines, not to mention the endotoxins (toxins which are products of the intestinal bacteria).

My idea is that ES causes damage to each and every person, but some conditions can amplify the effects:
* How much calcium is circulating in the blood
* Like you say, how much toxins are stored in the body ?
* How well is the digestive tract working and how much toxins are there in the colon ?
* Are the glands working properly such that they can easily handle fluctuations in blood sugar (regulation depends on insulin, adrenalin, cortisone, etc)
* etcetera

I'm currently using a sophisticated method of meassuring someone's overall health.
It's based on 7 tests from the urine and saliva and it's called Reams Bioligical Theory of Ionization.
There also exists a comparable biological terrain management system of which I've studied the website shortly.
What struck me, is that based on the values of the test, that system can tell you if you're ES or not.
Here's some info on the BTM system: http://www.healthydetox.org/articles/published_articles/rt_functional_medicine_terrain.html

After having tested with the RBTI test 15 people or so of which I know two are ES, there is some (test-set is way too small) indication that it might be related to a too alkaline body and liver.
This is reflected in both alkaline urine and alkaline saliva. In that pattern a slow digestion is implicated and a tendency for parasites in the intestines. Also, the alkaline numbers might mean an excess of calcium in the blood.
Coupled with the tendency of high frequency electrosmog to disrupt the intestinal-blood barrier this could explain the ES.
It even works twofold:
1. The intestines let endotoxins enter the bloodstream
2. The brain-blood barrier is disrupted and allow these toxins to cause havoc in the brain

Endotoxins can have grave effects on the brain. There are strong indications that endotoxins are the real cause of autism, epilepsy and schizophrenia.
I've seen several autistic kids recover completely once they stopped feeding the bacteria in their intestines (special diet like the one I'm using).

Like you said, this is just a theory.
Let me know what you think of it.

Ed,
The Netherlands

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by Glenn Coleman
> I am curious what level of ES sensitivity you are at if you don't use your
> SpringLife, after your years of detoxification?

Overall, my tolerance is MUCH better, even without the devices. 3 years
ago,
I couldn't tolerate sitting in front of a 15" LCD monitor for more than a
few minutes, or get anywhere near a CRT or TV set, and had to limit my
time in grocery stores and on a landline, wired phones (I used
speakerphones).
These days, the only thing I seem to have problems with are CRT monitors
and headphones. Now, to be fair, I don't have much experience as of late
spending time around things without a Springlife Polarizer in my pocket,
but on those rare occassions when I forget to bring one with me, things
seem to be fine as long as I don't have to be around a CRT monitor, a
headphone, or a cellphone. In fact, if anything, I probably feel a
little
better because I'm not detoxing as rapidly as usual.

> Have you considered writing a book, or creating a website that summarizes
> all your approaches? I have learned a huge amount through this group,
> and wonder if it would be even more helpful to have all your approaches
> summarized on a website? Just a point of view.

I have not considered doing anything really, because I still feel like
I don't have all the answers. Especially when things which work for
me don't always work for others. I only created this group because
I felt that most of the information about ES on the web advocates
avoidance or shielding as the only solutions, when in my experience
I've found that there are far better solutions. But now with this
group I can figure out whether these better solutions actually
work for more than just me!

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by ed@newtreatments.org
> I've observed that diet, minerals and other supplements can have a big
> impact on electrosmog sensitivity.

Yes, I've observed that as well. You might try looking at sodium
and potassium too. Eating sea salt makes my ES worse. Eating
foods high in potassium (dates, bananas, prunes, potatoes, sea
vegetables) makes my ES better.

I've also found that high carb is better than low carb. I tried low
carb when I was listening to the anti-candida folks, but this didn't
work for me. High carb does, however. I've read that the liver needs
carbs to work effeciently, and when one is detoxing, one needs to
support their liver!

I get my carbs from fruits, veggies, and grains -- although I do
not tolerate wheat, oats seem to be okay, and quinoa is great!

> * 100% raw diet with fruit, raw tuna, beef and egg yolks and lots of raw
> olive oil

As for oils, you might want to try evening primrose oil. This seems
to be helpful for ES as well.

> Here is a nice page with information on the negative hydride ion.
> http://www.h-minus-ion.org/

Thanks, I've never seen this page before! It's important to note
that what was once called "Microhydrin" is no longer what's currently
sold as Microhydrin, as a few years ago there was a dispute between
the inventor (Patrick Flanagan) and the company (Royal Body Care),
and Flanagan took his products to New Vision. So what was once
called Microhydrin is now called "Active H". There is also "Megahydrin",
but this is sold as a caplet, and I've found that the powder mixed
in water works much better than the capsules or caplets.

> After having tested with the RBTI test 15 people or so of which I know
> two are ES, there is some (test-set is way too small) indication that it
> might be related to a too alkaline body and liver.
> This is reflected in both alkaline urine and alkaline saliva.

I can recall that when I was testing my saliva and urine a few years
ago, it was way too acidic, not alkaline.

> I've seen several autistic kids recover completely once they stopped
> feeding the bacteria in their intestines (special diet like the one I'm
> using).

I've also found that some probiotics help my ES symptoms. Primal Defense
is a good example. I used to have a bad reaction to this when it
contained
chlorella as an ingredient, but now that they've replaced it with barley
grass it works great.

> Like you said, this is just a theory.
> Let me know what you think of it.

I do think that calcium and the blood/brain and blood/colon barriers are
important factors, but I actually haven't thought too much about theories
in general, because it seems that whatever is going on it's very
complicated, and I've been more concerned with finding things to make
me feel better! But I agree that your theory could be correct.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Marc Martin
Administrator
In reply to this post by Glenn Coleman
> Especially if your solutions are based on this theory and are working.

I think it would be more accurate to state this in reverse -- my theories
are based on the solutions which I've found to work! For me, step one
was to find things that worked. Step two was to try to figure out
*why* these things worked.

By the way, I'll soon be leaving on a vacation in Hawaii, so I won't be
as active here for the next 2 weeks (we will have a laptop with us, but
probably won't be using it much). I always seem to learn something
new when I go on vacation with respect to my ES symptoms, because the
environment is so different than what I'm used to. For example, on
our last vacation in Mexico, I learned the Springlife polarizers helped
with me being bothered by automobile fumes...

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

sungazing makes me electrosensitive??

Flavio
In reply to this post by ed@newtreatments.org
Hi Ed,

just wondering if you have noticed if sungazing makes you more
electrosensitive??.

when I abuse of sungazing (44 minutes) I have noticed that I become
extremely electrosensitive, so much that I can't stand staring at
the computer for 20 seconds nor staring at the platic white
blackboard of my classroom illuminated by white fluorescent lights.

Flavio

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Introduction

Flavio
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
hi mark,

> Also, I've been reading that foods which high in "good fats" are
also
> helpful in binding with toxins, and for this I realized that every
day I
> eat an organic avocado and some olive oil.


Aajonous Vonderplanitz whom espouses a raw animal diet wrote in both
of his books that raw animal fat is the main cleanser for the human
body.

Flavio

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: sungazing makes me electrosensitive??

ed@newtreatments.org
In reply to this post by Flavio
On Fri, 28 May 2004 06:16:51 -0000, flavio_novelo wrote:

>Hi Ed,
>
>just wondering if you have noticed if sungazing makes you more
>electrosensitive??.
>
>when I abuse of sungazing (44 minutes) I have noticed that I become
>extremely electrosensitive, so much that I can't stand staring at
>the computer for 20 seconds nor staring at the platic white
>blackboard of my classroom illuminated by white fluorescent lights.
>
>Flavio

Hi Flavio,

I've never abused sungazing, so I can't tell if it would worsen my sensitivity. I've now reached 25 minutes and 50 seconds and do it using the Hira Mankji protocol of increasing 10 seconds per day.
I notice the opposite: Because of the sungazing I feel much more energetic, and the better and energetic I feel, the higher my tolerance to EMF.
I think the worsening of sensitivity might be due to the abuse, as 44 minutes is quite a long time and I think you might be "overloading" your system.
It might also be that you're opening energy channels because of the overloading and hence the disturbing frequencies can easier penetrate your body.
It's important to go step by step and increase the energy/light capacity of the human body stepwise.

To all others:
You're probably not familiar with sungazing. It's a method of increasing one's energy, mental and physical health.
By looking at the sun each evening or morning (near sunrise or sunset, such that UV is low) and starting with 10 seconds per day and increasing by 10 seconds each day, you can overcome lots of mental and physical ailments.
If properly done (adhering to the Hira Manekji protocol above), I think it reduces electrosmog sensitivity because it increases health in general and helps your body detoxify.
Here are some references of interest:
Hira Manekji's website: http://www.solarhealing.com/
More on sungazing: http://www.rawpaleodiet.org/sungazing/ and http://www.sungazing.com/ and http://www.sunlight.as.ro/ and
Two recent survey results: http://www.sunlight.as.ro/statistics.htm and http://www.rawpaleodiet.org/sungazing/sg-surv-1.htm

Take care,

Ed,
The Netherlands

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: sungazing makes me electrosensitive??

Benson, Sarah (Sen L. Allison)
In reply to this post by Flavio
Is it possible that you could be damaging your eyes by looking at the
sun?
Sarah

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, 28 May 2004 8:19 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [eSens] sungazing makes me electrosensitive??


On Fri, 28 May 2004 06:16:51 -0000, flavio_novelo wrote:

>Hi Ed,
>
>just wondering if you have noticed if sungazing makes you more
>electrosensitive??.
>
>when I abuse of sungazing (44 minutes) I have noticed that I become
>extremely electrosensitive, so much that I can't stand staring at
>the computer for 20 seconds nor staring at the platic white
>blackboard of my classroom illuminated by white fluorescent lights.
>
>Flavio

Hi Flavio,

I've never abused sungazing, so I can't tell if it would worsen my
sensitivity. I've now reached 25 minutes and 50 seconds and do it using
the Hira Mankji protocol of increasing 10 seconds per day. I notice the
opposite: Because of the sungazing I feel much more energetic, and the
better and energetic I feel, the higher my tolerance to EMF. I think the
worsening of sensitivity might be due to the abuse, as 44 minutes is
quite a long time and I think you might be "overloading" your system. It
might also be that you're opening energy channels because of the
overloading and hence the disturbing frequencies can easier penetrate
your body. It's important to go step by step and increase the
energy/light capacity of the human body stepwise.

To all others:
You're probably not familiar with sungazing. It's a method of increasing
one's energy, mental and physical health. By looking at the sun each
evening or morning (near sunrise or sunset, such that UV is low) and
starting with 10 seconds per day and increasing by 10 seconds each day,
you can overcome lots of mental and physical ailments. If properly done
(adhering to the Hira Manekji protocol above), I think it reduces
electrosmog sensitivity because it increases health in general and helps
your body detoxify. Here are some references of interest: Hira Manekji's
website: http://www.solarhealing.com/ More on sungazing:
http://www.rawpaleodiet.org/sungazing/ and http://www.sungazing.com/ and
http://www.sunlight.as.ro/ and
Two recent survey results: http://www.sunlight.as.ro/statistics.htm and
http://www.rawpaleodiet.org/sungazing/sg-surv-1.htm

Take care,

Ed,
The Netherlands








 
Yahoo! Groups Links