Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks!
|
could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is
ramped up ? puk In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found
this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. Marc On June 13, [hidden email] wrote: > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is > ramped up ? > > puk > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > [hidden email] writes: > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > |
Thanks Marc. That is what I suspected. So the next question is, why would the two cable setup with the connector have a slower speed/data rate than the single cord?
--- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found > this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. > > Marc > > > > On June 13, paulpjc@... wrote: > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is > > ramped up ? > > > > puk > > > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > > russturk@... writes: > > > > > > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because > > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the > > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female > > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet > > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a > > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much > > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the > > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > |
Administrator
|
Are they different classifications of ethernet cables? (e.g. Cat 5 vs. Cat 6)
Is one of the cables damaged, perhaps? I'd be very interested if swapping out ethernet cables made any difference in symptoms. I can't claim to have much experience with that. Marc On June 13, russel395 <[hidden email]> wrote: > Thanks Marc. That is what I suspected. So the next question is, why would the two cable setup with the connector have a slower speed/data rate than the single cord? > > --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > > No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found > > this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > On June 13, paulpjc@... wrote: > > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is > > > ramped up ? > > > > > > puk > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > > > russturk@... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because > > > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > > > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the > > > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female > > > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet > > > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a > > > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much > > > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the > > > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > |
I can easily imagine that the connector degrades performance of the
connection...(ie more cross talk, more radiative losses, more susceptibility to interference from other sources) especially if the contact surfaces are dull, but to lesser extent regardless. You might even find that if you put an AM radio (tuned to static) near the computer you can hear the difference in connection speeds.. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Marc Martin <[hidden email]> wrote: > ** > > > Are they different classifications of ethernet cables? (e.g. Cat 5 vs. Cat > 6) > > Is one of the cables damaged, perhaps? > > I'd be very interested if swapping out ethernet cables made any difference > in symptoms. I can't claim to have much experience with that. > > Marc > > > On June 13, russel395 <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks Marc. That is what I suspected. So the next question is, why > would the two cable setup with the connector have a slower speed/data rate > than the single cord? > > > > --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > > > > No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found > > > this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > On June 13, paulpjc@... wrote: > > > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar > is > > > > ramped up ? > > > > > > > > puk > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > > > > russturk@... writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer > because > > > > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > > > > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room > from the > > > > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double > female > > > > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My > internet > > > > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector > for a > > > > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got > much > > > > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while > using the > > > > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
In reply to this post by PUK
thanks puk. that is always a possibility. although in this case I think for whatever reason the longer cord was a problem. things got better when I switched back.
--- In [hidden email], paulpjc@... wrote: > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is > ramped up ? > > puk > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > russturk@... writes: > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I have no idea what the different classifications are. Would it say on the cable itself?
I switched back to the two cable setup with the connector and that brought my symptoms back to normal. --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > Are they different classifications of ethernet cables? (e.g. Cat 5 vs. Cat 6) > > Is one of the cables damaged, perhaps? > > I'd be very interested if swapping out ethernet cables made any difference > in symptoms. I can't claim to have much experience with that. > > Marc > > > > On June 13, russel395 <russturk@...> wrote: > > Thanks Marc. That is what I suspected. So the next question is, why would the two cable setup with the connector have a slower speed/data rate than the single cord? > > > > --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@> wrote: > > > > > > No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found > > > this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > On June 13, paulpjc@ wrote: > > > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar is > > > > ramped up ? > > > > > > > > puk > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > > > > russturk@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer because > > > > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > > > > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room from the > > > > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double female > > > > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My internet > > > > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector for a > > > > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got much > > > > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while using the > > > > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by BiBrun
yeah, my guess is that the the single long cable provided a stronger/faster signal than the two cable setup with the connector, possibly for the reasons you mention.
--- In [hidden email], Bill Bruno <wbruno@...> wrote: > > I can easily imagine that the connector degrades performance of the > connection...(ie more cross talk, more radiative losses, more > susceptibility to interference from other sources) especially if the > contact surfaces are dull, but to lesser extent regardless. > > You might even find that if you put an AM radio (tuned to static) near the > computer you can hear the difference in connection speeds.. > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Marc Martin <marc@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Are they different classifications of ethernet cables? (e.g. Cat 5 vs. Cat > > 6) > > > > Is one of the cables damaged, perhaps? > > > > I'd be very interested if swapping out ethernet cables made any difference > > in symptoms. I can't claim to have much experience with that. > > > > Marc > > > > > > On June 13, russel395 <russturk@...> wrote: > > > Thanks Marc. That is what I suspected. So the next question is, why > > would the two cable setup with the connector have a slower speed/data rate > > than the single cord? > > > > > > --- In [hidden email], Marc Martin <marc@> wrote: > > > > > > > > No, I think the increased data rate causes additional symptoms. I found > > > > this out myself when I upgraded my DSL from 1.5 Mbs to 7.0 Mbs. > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On June 13, paulpjc@ wrote: > > > > > could be that you are just anxious about the change so your ES radar > > is > > > > > ramped up ? > > > > > > > > > > puk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 6/13/2013 5:21:31 A.M. Dateline Standard Time, > > > > > russturk@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are all ethernet cables the same? I guess I kind of know the answer > > because > > > > > I am finding out as I look this up that there are category 5 cables, > > > > > category 6 cables, etc. Anyways, I had a computer in a seperate room > > from the > > > > > modem and connected to it by two ethernet cables joined by a double > > female > > > > > connector (neither cable was long enough to reach on it's own). My > > internet > > > > > was very slow so I swapped the two shorter cables and the connector > > for a > > > > > much longer cable that reach all the way on it's own. Anyways, I got > > much > > > > > faster internet but got much worse EMF sensitivity symptoms while > > using the > > > > > computer. Anyone have any idea what might be going on here? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |