[esens] 17" LCD much more EMF than 15" LCD?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[esens] 17" LCD much more EMF than 15" LCD?

Glenn Coleman
I have determined that I am far more sensitive to CRT than LCD, so am
switching over my desktop computer to an LCD.

It seems most people prefer a 17" monitor so they can see the images more
easily on the screen and work with large documents.

I'm curious if anyone has noticed a big difference in EMF between 15" and
17" LCD? It seems the 17" would be worse for EMF from logic, but curious
how it works out in real life.

Regards,

Glenn

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 17" LCD much more EMF than 15" LCD?

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I have determined that I am far more sensitive to CRT than LCD, so am
> switching over my desktop computer to an LCD.

Did you determine this even after extended use of an LCD? In my case,
I thought the LCD was better initially, but then after several days
use, I found myself becoming much more sensitive to florescent lights
than ever before, and this went away after switching back to a CRT.

I find my CRT sensitivity to be resolution-dependent. That is, 1024x768
is worse than 800x600, etc.

> I'm curious if anyone has noticed a big difference in EMF between 15" and
> 17" LCD?

I've tried both a 15" and a 19", and they both seemed equally bad. :-)

Marc