Login  Register

energy star

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

energy star

Paresh
71 posts
Does anyone know if "energy star compliant" (TV's) means less emf? Thanks.
blessings,
Paresh

http://home.earthlink.net/~sunmoonyoga/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: energy star

Marc Martin
Administrator
5813 posts
> Does anyone know if "energy star compliant" (TV's) means less emf?

It means less power usage, doesn't it? It actually could be worse
from an EMF standpoint, if they use switching power supplies to
reduce power usage.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: energy star

emraware
172 posts
Right, energy-efficiency does not necessarily imply EMF safety. The CFL light-bulbs which are energy-efficient do so by turning on and off many many times in a second. This ends up adding frequencies onto the powerlines in kHz range. It may cause health symptoms in people.

For TV's, I would tend to prefer LCD flat panel monitors over plasma (a source of dirty electricity) and over CRT-type TV's (a source of AC magnetic fields).

For computer monitors, as well, I prefer LCD flat panel monitors, over CRT monitors ( a source of AC magnetic fields). In terms of certification, I do like TCO'99 or later compliance in monitors, but even without it, many (although not all) of the LCD flat panel monitors are ok. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCO_Certification

--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@...> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if "energy star compliant" (TV's) means less emf?
>
> It means less power usage, doesn't it? It actually could be worse
> from an EMF standpoint, if they use switching power supplies to
> reduce power usage.
>
> Marc
>