It is interesting that the site claims:
"According to the laws of physics and biology, the structure of the
EMF fields (frequency, amplitude and waveform) needs to be CONSTANT
[emphasis mine] not only in time (intervals), but also in space
(covering the exposed cells across the entire surface - spatial
coherence) in order for the field to act like a (digital information)
signal, able to communicate and interact with the cellular system."
So they are stating it is the constancy of signals received from
electrical devices that allow the EMF to be biointeractive.
And their solution is to make a chip that generates noise to mix with
the 'constant' EMF fields.
How really common it is to encounter purely constant waveforms with
the power distribution grid we have today? Not to mention the
unpredicable interaction and noise of devices electromagnetically
coupled together through combined use in a house?
And some ppl are finding relief with devices which make the EMR/EMF
environment more constant, e.g, stetzer filters and quantum pro/home, etc.
Perhaps the types of EMF biointeractions being seen in the studies
this group bases its noise-adding solution on aren't those which
stimulate ES? The more chaotic -- not constant -- the EM field is the
more easily the field triggers ES symptoms, and the symptoms are
usually more severe, too. (This from those with ES I've spoken with,
my own experience, and in the experience of a doctor who has worked
with many ES patients in the US.) But there are always variations on
a theme.
I'd be very interested to see if a person with ES could handle an EMF
noise generator being added to her/his environment.
--- In
[hidden email], "alstrup" <alstrup@...> wrote:
>
> Anyone here tested this technology?
>
>
http://www.emxbiochip.com/>
Locked
