emf info

This was just reported at our local Environmental Health meeting:


Concerns are being raised about the cumulative effects of transients on the
AC power lines upon human health. One source of such transients is the dimmer
switches that have become common in the last several years.

A brief explanation of how these dimmer switches work is in order - They use
a semiconductor element called a thyristor, which can be either a triac or a
silicon controlled rectifier, to switch on the power to the load, such as a
lamp, 120 times a second. At exactly what point in the AC power waveform the
switching occurs determines just how much power goes to the load. These
thyristors have the property that when they are switched on, they immediately
- within a few millionths of a second - deliver the entire power to the load.
Which in turn causes a short but very intense radio frequency transient.

The biggest transient is generated when the dimmer switch is set for
delivering about half power to the lamp - the power being switched on during
the maximum of the waveform.

Thus to minimize the intensity of the transients, one should not set the
dimmer in the range of half power to the lamp.

Another point worth keeping in mind about dimmers is that most lamps do not
begin to light up until some 10 ... 20 percent of their rated power is
applied. Which means that even though the dimmer is set to "off", power is
still flowing to the lamp. Which in turn still generates some radio frequency
transients. Dimmers should be unplugged or switched off with a metal switch
to really stop their transients.


For much more information about reducing Electromagnetic Fields, see the
following book -

Silencing the Fields
Author: Ed Leeper
Web:
http://www.silencingthefields.com/


Jill/Colorado

> These thyristors have the property that when they are switched on, they
> immediately - within a few millionths of a second - deliver the entire power to the
> load. Which in turn causes a short but very intense radio frequency transient.

Yes, dimmer switches are nasty. I think the same problem occurs with
fluorescent lights, which are also turned on & off at a rapid rate.

Marc

Hi,

I just read this interesting information from this website: http://www.health-angel.net/pages/page.php?gid=6&subgid=0&id=58
Also, please check out the other articles at http://www.health-angel.net/ . Most are quite interesting.

Im thinking of trying this therapy, but Id like to know if anyone has experience with Health Angel, or BioPhotons or Electron Spin Inversion ?

Thanks in advance for your replies,

Ed,
The Netherlands

Hi All

You might find this web site interesting:
http://www.stetzerelectric.com/filters/research/

There are a number of papers on this page concering the problems
from dirty power. They also have a meter to measure how bad the
problem is and filters to remove the problem. I bought the meter
and had readings as high as 800. I got the filters and now have
readings ranging from 20 to 60. Yes, I can tell the difference.
You are right about the dimmer switches. You can see it on the
meter even with the filters installed.

Fluorescent lights are not as bad on the meter as long as the
ballast is good. If the light flickers then all bets are off.

I do notice on the TriField meter the magnetic field near a
fluorescent light can be very high. If they are high enough up you
are away from it though probably still not good for you.

Bill E



--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote:
> > These thyristors have the property that when they are switched
on, they
> > immediately - within a few millionths of a second - deliver the
entire power to the
> > load. Which in turn causes a short but very intense radio
frequency transient.
>
> Yes, dimmer switches are nasty. I think the same problem occurs
with
> fluorescent lights, which are also turned on & off at a rapid rate.
>
> Marc

Hi guys,

Never got any meters, thought i was one at times. Fluorescent lights still get me, and cellular phones. The other day i was in the supermarket and they had the product i wanted less than 10cm under the fluorescent light, yeah could barely reach under there, got hit and decided i did not wanna get that particular nori sheet. (although i guess you could tachyonize it back to health, too bad they donut wanna disclose their secret, oh well, probably would not get the theory anywhooose...

One cell phone can discombublate me. !000 + make me feel liquid (airport), none can kill me and an hour (or sooner) after I AM allright. So maybe no worry,

Love
Ehrhart2h <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi All

You might find this web site interesting:
http://www.stetzerelectric.com/filters/research/

There are a number of papers on this page concering the problems
from dirty power. They also have a meter to measure how bad the
problem is and filters to remove the problem. I bought the meter
and had readings as high as 800. I got the filters and now have
readings ranging from 20 to 60. Yes, I can tell the difference.
You are right about the dimmer switches. You can see it on the
meter even with the filters installed.

Fluorescent lights are not as bad on the meter as long as the
ballast is good. If the light flickers then all bets are off.

I do notice on the TriField meter the magnetic field near a
fluorescent light can be very high. If they are high enough up you
are away from it though probably still not good for you.

Bill E



--- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote:
> > These thyristors have the property that when they are switched
on, they
> > immediately - within a few millionths of a second - deliver the
entire power to the
> > load. Which in turn causes a short but very intense radio
frequency transient.
>
> Yes, dimmer switches are nasty. I think the same problem occurs
with
> fluorescent lights, which are also turned on & off at a rapid rate.
>
> Marc





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[hidden email]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> I bought the meter and had readings as high as 800. I got
> the filters and now have readings ranging from 20 to 60.

Thanks for that info -- we haven't had too many people report
on the Stezter filters... the only report I've ever heard
before was a negative report from someone who ended up
returning them.

I had been meaning to purchase the meter to run some
experiments, but had forgotten. Thanks for reminding me
(now ordered!).

I also just ordered *one* Stezter filter so I can take a
look at it. I've tried other types of noise suppressing
filters before, and found them extremely agitating. I'm
suspecting that while they suppress frequencies in certain
ranges, they also add noise harmonics in other ranges in
the process (I note that the Stetzer filters say they
work best in the 4-100 khz range). Even though they
recommend 20 for an entire house, I'm sure that I'll be
able to tell if they're agitating with just one...
(the advantage of being sensitive).

Marc

I asked them also some questions.
But got no answers yet.

>that the Stetzer filters say they work best in the 4-100 khz range

That is something special.

I have this Endotronic VLF or HAARP Detektor, which measures from 5 kHz - 30
kHz, and from 30 kHz - 150 kHz.
I also found some disturbing sources, even on telephones with wires!!
See the MP3 samples on my website.
So this frequency range can have distressing effects on electrosensibles.
See page 15 from *het bitje* October 2004.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus



----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 18:43
Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: emf info

Hi Ed

3 of us; my friend; hubby & I had biontology treatments last yr in London, I believe it's one of most advanced method; especially if the therapist is very knowledgeable & experienced; this method is more advanced than Rife, acupuncture etc. Treatments are very simple & easiest( on the client's side) & hardly any or very few detox symptoms.

My biontologist was very sick for most of her life with lyme & emf sensitivity before biotology treatments; she was treated by Johan Boswinkel & recovered in very short time; now even her appearance really expresses her good health!

We all had inverted spin, but I had massive inverted spins & readings showed massive dysfunctions in my system, hormonal, gall bladder, stomach, kidney, etc etc; my therapist told me to expect more sessions than average because I also had many traumas in childhood & in my whole life. She did lots of emotional treatments for me & 8 sessions I was mostly done, my signals became clean & all showed straight lines.

The first priority of the treatment is to correct inverted spin so that other treatments would work. When the body is cleansed of functional disturbances ( caused by metals, toxins, virus, bacteria, traumas, etc) the body is less prone to emf & spin inversions.

Biontology seems to be the only method known to correct spin inversion and because emf sensitivity is very much an issue of spin inversion, & may possibly have toxins , metals etc involved, it's good logics to me that biontology is the most effective method because it can neutralize toxins & pathogens the quickest way than other methods.

I read that in Europe, the alternative method using Biocom ( or similar) electro-acupuncture & bio-resonance system together with rife device; naturepathic medicine etc have long been used by many doctors & health practitioners & they have claimed high success rates for many diseases; they have done  research studies collaborated with large nos of these health professionals & clinics.

The 'Chiren' Biontology device is more advanced than Biocom as it use true bio-photon using optic fiber cable; true bio-photon can be absorbed anywhere in the body, unlike electrical signals & freqs which are subject to resistance/impedance in skin & body.

Boswinkel's theory of causes of health / disease seems very unique & I guess his theories probably contradict many other established theories.

It would be really great if more people with emf issues try the biontology, so that we know if this is one good solution to emf sensivity. My hope is that if the world cannot change the emf situation, at least someone in future would invent a simple affordable device similar to 'Chiren' device which we can correct the inverted spin regularly as needed.

my previous message
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/message/27242

You are very lucky you live in Holland as there are quite a few biontologists there; many of my friends in HK or here in UK are not so lucky!
( I suggest listing out all past present health problems; weaknesses; traumas etc to help better diagnosis)

best wishes
alice



--- In [hidden email], "Ed - Netherlands" <groups@...> wrote: