I whole heartedly agree with you. Also: they can patent pharmaceuticals but they cannot patent mother nature's gift of herbs! (not that they haven't tried). A good example of this is how they marketed Margarine, which is one molecule away from plastic. First they did the marketing spin against butter, then they whipped out their solution: fake plastic margarine. They demonized Ephedra because they knew it worked. And they couldn't patent it. They did the same thing with sugar, when they came out with aspartame. Lizzie > To: [hidden email] > From: [hidden email] > Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:28:59 -0700 > Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: Safety of Chinese Herbs & Medicines? > > Thanks for bringing this up! I like a chance to fight back against this > particular sort of criticism... > > Any TCM practitioner will know how to use things containing aristolochic > acid and ephedra. These are ridiculously useful herbs, but in high doses, > used incorrectly, can cause problems - hence practitioners go to school and > learn to prescribe them correctly. This is the wrong kind of paranoia > around chinese herbs, as far as I'm concerned. The animal products, > though, are problematic - a lot of endangered species have bones, teeth, > horns, etc that are used as herbs. They tend to not usually be what they > say they are, just due to cost. Those probably won't do much; and the real > things obviously shouldn't be sold because the animals are endangered. My > overall point, though, is that I'd definitely be more worried about metals > and pesticide residues than ephedra. Ephedra is an herb that, in the US, > we can't get anymore as practitioners and that has really hindered our > ability to practice herbs, as it is the only thing that has its function, > and it's super effective at what it does. To me, what this article > usefully points out is what I said in a previous post - get herbs from good > companies that test their products. And get herbs prescribed - don't take > something because you googled it and think it will help. You may even find > something that's useful, but if you take too much, it can be dangerous. > Good herbalists are trained for mitigating toxicity with other herbs, too. > > Above and beyond all this is the fact that such studies don't compare herbs > to pharmaceuticals, which are more dangerous and toxic. Remember how > Paracelsus said that the dose makes the poison? That applies well to > herbal medicine, natural substances. Of course, we know it doesn't really > apply well to man-made substances or inventions... > > Those are my thoughts on this. Sorry if I'm ranting - I really do care > about herb safety, so it irritates me that what gets publicized seems to > really miss the mark. > > -Amanda > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, C.a.b. Johnson <[hidden email]>wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Amanda, > > > > Since you are on the subject of Chinese herb safety, here is an article > > that came out last week concerning the safety of some Traditional Chinese > > Medicines: > > > > > > http://m.yahoo.com/w/news_america/dna-tests-uncover-hazards-chinese-therapies-211109236.html?back=%2Fhealth%2F&.ts=1334297414&.intl=us&.lang=en > > > > DNA tests uncover hazards in Chinese therapies > > AFP - Thu, Apr 12, 2012 > > > > <snippets> > > A host of potential toxins, allergens and traces of endangered animals > > showed up in DNA sequencing tests on 15 Chinese traditional medicines, > > researchers said on Thursday. > > > > The samples analyzed for this study included herbal teas, capsules, > > powders and flakes that were seized by Australian border officials and were > > subsequently tested by scientists at Australia's Murdoch University. > > > > Plant agents suspected of causing urinary tract and kidney cancer such as > > Aristolochic acid, as well as the potentially poisonous herb ephedra were > > among the dangerous elements found. > > > > Some of the 68 different plant families that were detected in the 15 > > samples can be toxic if taken in the wrong doses, but the packaging did not > > list the concentrations of the elements inside, he said. > > > > "We also found traces from trade restricted animals that are classified as > > vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered, including the Asiatic > > black bear and Saiga antelope" he said, adding that some contained > > ingredients that were not included on the label. > > > > "A product labeled as 100 percent Saiga antelope contained considerable > > quantities of goat and sheep DNA," he said. > > > > "Another product, Mongnan Tianbao pills, contained deer and cow DNA, the > > latter of which may violate some religious or cultural strictures." > > > > > > > > --- On Sat, 4/21/12, Amanda Kolter <[hidden email]> wrote: > > The only general caution I have with ES patients, when it comes to herbs, > > is to be careful about the source of your herbs. Many are from China and > > are not tested for heavy metals, which are all over China. KPC is a good > > brand; Golden Flower is as well; and there are many such brands that > > undergo extensive metal and pesticide testing, but just buying whatever is > > in Chinatown is not necessarily a good idea. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by melissascotthasmail
Awesome article, thank you for sending this!
-Amanda On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM, melissascotthasmail < [hidden email]> wrote: > ** > > > Totally enjoying this discussion of EHS with the Asian Medicine view! > > Just in case you haven't seen this: "The Pulse, the Electronic Age and > Radiation: Early Detection" By Leon Hammer, MD and Ross Rosen LAc is at > http://dragonrises.org/articles/pulseelectronicageradiation.pdf > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [hidden email] [hidden email] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
On Sat, 3/3/12, maureen <[hidden email]> said: For some years now I've reported piercing pain in my throat just under my chin on either side when the technology here is at its worst. Very painful, and I found using aluminium covered ear defenders helped a little. At that time I replied that I also experienced piercing pain under my chin at times. Well tonight I discovered something. I took out the ironing board and after ironing 4 garments I began to have severe severe horrific pain under my chin. I knew right away that it must be the iron, so I got out the Gauss Meter and it tested at about 2.0 milligauss. That readig is slightly over the acceptable range of 1.0 milligauss for human exposure, but not so bad that it should be causing me such severe pain. I kept testing it and moving the meter around, and suddenly the iron clicked on and the Gauss meter shot up to 48.0 milligauss! Apparently, this particular iron heats up to a certain temperature then clicks off and clicks on again to keep the temp up. I don't know if all irons do this. Well, when the iron clicked on to heat up, that is when I was getting super blasted with EMF. And with my hand on the iron, it was within 2 inches of the heating element and the EMF was traveling right up my arm, maybe making a circuit with the gold crowns in my mouth - or who knows what. So after that, I unplugged the iron and the pain under my chin immediately decreased but a dull pain and a headache persisted for the next 5 hours as if I had been physically injured. So, besides bad reactions to automobile floorboards, I recently got rid of all my electronic massage tools. Chi Machine, plug in tape recorder, a heat lamp, and a list of other electronic devices that had Gauss readings off the wall. Now I can add my iron to the list. I wondered if I am getting EMF's from having my hand on the computer mouse for hours at a time? I have a corded mouse that plugs into the keyboard, but the keyboard plugs into the monitor and the monitor plugs into computer and the computer plugs into the outlet. I do not get a significant reading from the mouse, keyboard or monitor on the Gauss meter. The computer tower reads about 3.0 milligaus. But watch out for computer speakers - they can give off bad EMF. I have an Altec Lansing subwoofer that gives off 35.0 to 40.0 milligauss. It used to be under my computer station by my legs, now it is about 6 feet away. I should probably get rid of them too. Anyone know of some good speakers with less EMF's? I became electrosensitive to electronic devices onliy after I was fried by Cell Tower Radiation and having a cordless phone for many years. By the way, when my body fills up with Cell Tower Radiation, I also get chin pain. This may be because there are lower gigahertz waves travelling along with the higher gigahertz microwaves from the cell tower. Anybody else have symptoms when ironing clothes? C. Johnson Superdrove@yahoo.,com Wireless Refugee [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Amanda Kolter
Well said, Amanda, though I think the report was conveyed out of natural concern.
Disclosure: I'm of Chinese origin, biologically, with some Chinese pride intact. (The name Kumara is given at my Buddhist monkhood ordination.) So, I can be a little bit bias here. :-) At the risk of turning this forum into a debate on something off-topic, I'd like to point out a few things about the report that suggest that it's meant to be a scare without lying: *potential* toxins *suspected* of causing urinary tract and kidney cancer *can* be toxic *if* taken in the wrong doses See if these sounds similar: *potential* terrorist, *suspected* bird/swine flu. Yikes! The regular food that we eat may well contain more toxins. As for corporate-driven pharmaceuticals, I rather not even start. kb Amanda Kolter wrote thus at 01:28 25/04/2012: >Thanks for bringing this up! I like a chance to fight back against this >particular sort of criticism... > >Any TCM practitioner will know how to use things containing aristolochic >acid and ephedra. These are ridiculously useful herbs, but in high doses, >used incorrectly, can cause problems - hence practitioners go to school and >learn to prescribe them correctly. This is the wrong kind of paranoia >around chinese herbs, as far as I'm concerned. The animal products, >though, are problematic - a lot of endangered species have bones, teeth, >horns, etc that are used as herbs. They tend to not usually be what they >say they are, just due to cost. Those probably won't do much; and the real >things obviously shouldn't be sold because the animals are endangered. My >overall point, though, is that I'd definitely be more worried about metals >and pesticide residues than ephedra. Ephedra is an herb that, in the US, >we can't get anymore as practitioners and that has really hindered our >ability to practice herbs, as it is the only thing that has its function, >and it's super effective at what it does. To me, what this article >usefully points out is what I said in a previous post - get herbs from good >companies that test their products. And get herbs prescribed - don't take >something because you googled it and think it will help. You may even find >something that's useful, but if you take too much, it can be dangerous. >Good herbalists are trained for mitigating toxicity with other herbs, too. > >Above and beyond all this is the fact that such studies don't compare herbs >to pharmaceuticals, which are more dangerous and toxic. Remember how >Paracelsus said that the dose makes the poison? That applies well to >herbal medicine, natural substances. Of course, we know it doesn't really >apply well to man-made substances or inventions... > >Those are my thoughts on this. Sorry if I'm ranting - I really do care >about herb safety, so it irritates me that what gets publicized seems to >really miss the mark. > >-Amanda > >On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, C.a.b. Johnson <[hidden email]>wrote: > >> ** >> >> >> Amanda, >> >> Since you are on the subject of Chinese herb safety, here is an article >> that came out last week concerning the safety of some Traditional Chinese >> Medicines: >> >> >> http://m.yahoo.com/w/news_america/dna-tests-uncover-hazards-chinese-therapies-211109236.html?back=%2Fhealth%2F&.ts=1334297414&.intl=us&.lang=en >> >> DNA tests uncover hazards in Chinese therapies >> AFP - Thu, Apr 12, 2012 >> >> <snippets> >> A host of potential toxins, allergens and traces of endangered animals >> showed up in DNA sequencing tests on 15 Chinese traditional medicines, >> researchers said on Thursday. >> >> The samples analyzed for this study included herbal teas, capsules, >> powders and flakes that were seized by Australian border officials and were >> subsequently tested by scientists at Australia's Murdoch University. >> >> Plant agents suspected of causing urinary tract and kidney cancer such as >> Aristolochic acid, as well as the potentially poisonous herb ephedra were >> among the dangerous elements found. >> >> Some of the 68 different plant families that were detected in the 15 >> samples can be toxic if taken in the wrong doses, but the packaging did not >> list the concentrations of the elements inside, he said. >> >> "We also found traces from trade restricted animals that are classified as >> vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered, including the Asiatic >> black bear and Saiga antelope" he said, adding that some contained >> ingredients that were not included on the label. >> >> "A product labeled as 100 percent Saiga antelope contained considerable >> quantities of goat and sheep DNA," he said. >> >> "Another product, Mongnan Tianbao pills, contained deer and cow DNA, the >> latter of which may violate some religious or cultural strictures." |
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by C.a.b. Johnson
Wow that's a high emf iron I'll check ours, don't use it much.
Our cheaper speakers are reading 1 Gauss on the cords, http://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Acoustics-Computer-Speaker-System/dp/B00008MN45 but are plugged into a Stetzer power strip. Kathy From: C.a.b. Johnson <superdrove@yahoo.com> Subject: [eSens] Re: Chin Pain and Ironing To: eSens@yahoogroups.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |