Hi eSens,
My friend Dafna just sent this to me hot off the presses. Looks like another good info source. Have a great weekend! Oh and remember that EHS Awareness month is next month. They did an excellent job of getting the word out last year. Even CNN did an expose' on Anderson Cooper, plus I caught several mainstream news reports including the one about the WHO claiming that cell phones "may" be a carcinogen. I know, still way behind the truth, but everyone will not get cancer due to cell phones. I met a guy who smokes 2 packs of cigarettes a day and has lived to be 73. He was in the hospital, but not for COPD, lung ca or heart disease. Yet this doesn't mean that cigarettes are safe or that his immunity is great. It just means that genetically he isn't as susceptible to cigarette toxins as others may be. Of course we know this, don't we? Pam --- On Thu, 4/12/12, Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]> Subject: Why Appled Banned this app??? To: Date: Thursday, April 12, 2012, 11:44 AM I wonder why Apple didnt want to sell this app?! http://www.activistpost.com/2012/04/cellphone-radiation-detector-app-banned.html Best regards Yours Olle (Olle Johansson, assoc. prof. The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute 171 77 Stockholm Sweden & Professor The Royal Institute of Technology 100 44 Stockholm Sweden) -- Dafna Tachover [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Interesting. I read about this Tawkon technology a few years ago. This is how I see it: IF apple had used the radiation app, it would be akin to making a public admission: By offering an app that lets the cell ph user know how much radiation they are being exposed to by their cell phone, they are also saying: "this is something to be concerned with." Not exactly the marketing spin that suits their needs. This would be like a product that contains aspartame or splenda or neotame listing the side effects of aspartame. They'd much rather a user know how many minutes they've used in a month, then advertise that their product just might not be safe! Lizzie To: [hidden email] From: [hidden email] Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:04:35 -0700 Subject: [eSens] Why Appled Banned this app??? This looks like a good info source. Hi eSens, My friend Dafna just sent this to me hot off the presses. Looks like another good info source. Have a great weekend! Oh and remember that EHS Awareness month is next month. They did an excellent job of getting the word out last year. Even CNN did an expose' on Anderson Cooper, plus I caught several mainstream news reports including the one about the WHO claiming that cell phones "may" be a carcinogen. I know, still way behind the truth, but everyone will not get cancer due to cell phones. I met a guy who smokes 2 packs of cigarettes a day and has lived to be 73. He was in the hospital, but not for COPD, lung ca or heart disease. Yet this doesn't mean that cigarettes are safe or that his immunity is great. It just means that genetically he isn't as susceptible to cigarette toxins as others may be. Of course we know this, don't we? Pam --- On Thu, 4/12/12, Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Dafna Tachover <[hidden email]> Subject: Why Appled Banned this app??? To: Date: Thursday, April 12, 2012, 11:44 AM I wonder why Apple didnt want to sell this app?! http://www.activistpost.com/2012/04/cellphone-radiation-detector-app-banned.html Best regards Yours Olle (Olle Johansson, assoc. prof. The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience Karolinska Institute 171 77 Stockholm Sweden & Professor The Royal Institute of Technology 100 44 Stockholm Sweden) -- Dafna Tachover [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
What a Tangled Web of Deception They Weave. Kathy <[hidden email]> wrote: RE: [eSens] Why Appled Banned this app??? This looks like a good info source. Interesting. I read about this Tawkon technology a few years ago. This is how I see it: IF apple had used the radiation app, it would be akin to making a public admission: By offering an app that lets the cell ph user know how much radiation they are being exposed to by their cell phone, they are also saying: "this is something to be concerned with." Not exactly the marketing spin that suits their needs. They'd much rather a user know how many minutes they've used in a month, then advertise that their product just might not be safe! Lizzie source. Have a great weekend! I wonder why Apple didnt want to sell this app?! http://www.activistpost.com/2012/04/cellphone-radiation-detector-app-banned.html Best regards Yours Olle (Olle Johansson, assoc. prof. The Experimental Dermatology Unit Department of Neuroscience The Royal Institute of Technology 100 44 Stockholm Sweden) -- Dafna Tachover [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |