Unrecognizable frequencies?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Unrecognizable frequencies?

Romana
This post was updated on .
Are there some "bad" frequenzies which comsumer grade measure instruments can't detect?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

charles
Yes.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

superdrove
Speaking of frequencies that our cheapo instruments will not pick up, what is to be done when 5G is deployed?  As you know, the major telecom industries are pushing hard to have it deployed by 2020.  See my post entitled "5G Test Cities 2018".

I have the Acoustimeter and the manual says it measures "average levels of radio frequency and microwave frequency electromagnetic fields, covering the spectrum from 200 MHz (digital TV and radio) all the way up to and beyond the latest 5.6 GHz WiFi and WiMax frequencies to over 8 GHz."

8 GHz is hardly close to the millimeter wave spectrum the 5G wants to deploy on us.  Charles, I suppose you could be called the meter expert on this forum, so in your opinion, what affordable instrument can we get that will be able to pick up 30 to 300 GHz or will be have to get a spectrometer with a computer?

Also, what about fabrics?  Most EMF fabrics on the market protect up to 10 GHz.  Are we going to have to use like 20 layers of a 10 GHz fabric to block out these millimeter waves or will we be able to block them at all?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

charles
I see this differently.
I am not afraid for 5G, because it is meant for fast data transport in the higher frequency ranges of GHz.
Also I do know a lot about bioresonance and its effects on our health.
In general, in bioresonance lower frequencies are used (Rife in the Hz region, and Clark in the kHz region.
As I have often stated, it is my experience that the lower to mid frequencies are the culprit, so between 5kHz and 10-20MHz.
Be aware that many highfrequency carriers do contain a lot of low frequency *dirt*. And these low frequencies do have an enormous impact on our body.

Edward S. Boyden has done some tests on mice.
http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(17)30584-6?dgcid=cell.com-slider_referral_cell-slider-boyden
He placed two high frequency beams on the head of the mouse, and where these beams did intersect, there was a very low frequency field as a resonance. That way they could manipulate the brains of the mouse.

Overhere we now experience the same effect by our telecom provider.
It should be well known, that I am professionally familiar with all mobile phonemasts in our surroundings.
After 20 years exposure to all sorts of elektrosmog, I never felt anything. (My wife is another story.)
On beginning July 2017, we suddenly felt *attacked*, my wife stood shaking in the kitchen and felt stinging in her head. My blood pressure went very high. Measuring did not show anything. I asked Gebbensleben, the specialist in longitudinal waves, if he might have a clue. With remote viewing he told me that a new and dangerous transmitter was started, and he showed its direction.
After I consultyed the plans of the Anteneregister, I found that T-Mobile has changed transmitters in July.
Normally transmitter freqiuencies are wide from each other, but here there was LTE900 with 950MHz, NB-IoT (Internet of Things) with 954,703MHz and UMTS900 with 957,4MHz.  Havbing a large bandwith, these frequencies caused interferences of very low frequencies.



Here a screenshot of the radiation of the hree transmitters TOGETHER, which amounts to 1 µW/m² or 0,02V/m. That is atonishing low, very low normally not to mention.
But is had devastating effects.
Inside our appartment I put on my blood pressure meter, and measured 130. Then I went oiut the frontdoor in the beam of our *Killer Beam*, and it went op to 180. Inside it slowed to 150.
I did this several times.
Gebbensleben calls the longitudinal waves Hyperschall. He stated that at my frontdoor was 4000dB HS, plus 1600dB magnetical longitudinal waves. For being healthy one needs 120dB (my ClaeSmog gives 120dB).
Before that we could walk to the shopping centre, about 1 kilometer. Now, before reaching 200 meters, we had to return because of heart and lung problems.

Since July, already 5 persons have been taken by ambulance to the hospital with blood pressure problems, and brain haemorrhage, and they died very quick and suddenly.

We have shilded the front walls of our appartment according the stuff by Gebbensleben as described on
http://www.milieuziektes.nl/Pagina600.html, and wearing outside a ClaeSmog2.
Aside to that I mad a homeopathic for Lyme disease for my wife, and since then,her last 5% electrosensitivity has disappeared. She now is waling 1,5 kilomter without any problem.

I call this a *Killer Beam*, others say it is only 4Hz  (the resulting enterference. It is practically undetectable normally.
On the Antenneregister I have seen that in October a second triad has been erected in the neighbourhood of the first one, but our shieldin has covered it.

Many persons in our country claim now hearing humming sounds all over their house.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

charles
Where 5G is meant for fast signals, and ultra speedy transmissions, that is not the case with NB-IoT, or Narrow Band Internet of Things.
NB-IoT is not for highspeed signals. It is meant for instance to see whether a container is full and needs emptying. It is lowspeed communication in a network. While there is a continuous signalling to and from. the important driving signals are only once in a while.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

Miller
So Charles, from your experience, the most harmful frequencies range from 5kHz-20MHz and that they can be mixed in with higher frequencies as dirt? Can the 5kHz-20MHz range accompany the really low range of 60Hz?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Unrecognizable frequencies?

charles
I mean the high frequency carrier waves are relatively *clean*.
It is the digitally information they are carrying that forms the dirt.
A GSM900 mobile is pulsed with 217Hz; a GSM900 mobile phone mast is pulsed with 1733Hz.
A DECT phone  with carrier wave 1880MHz is pulsd with 100Hz.
However this is not clean, but inhibits a lot of *dirt*, as can be seen here:



The 50 or 60Hz are relatively *clean*.
But, and a big but, when an electrical appliance is used, it becomes very dirty.
And the more appliances are used, even at the neighbours, the *dirtier* it gets.