UE European Scientific Committe on cancer / EFM

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

UE European Scientific Committe on cancer / EFM

cinciripini
Hello to all !

I've received a Newsletter from an Italian Oncology Doctores
association that some 'Scentific Committe' answered back to European
Commission about the risk of tumors by EMF/Mobile Phones.
The answer is negative: no increase of number of tumors can be expected
in case of 'correct' use of mobiles, below 10 years .
If more than 10 years ... other studies should be planned !

Have you heard any so bad news ?

Giorgio

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

No risk from EFM !

cinciripini
this is the result of the below Commitee ...
have you got any info about this ?

Giorgio



--- In [hidden email], "giorgio" <CINCIRIPINI@...> wrote:
>
> Hello to all !
>
> I've received a Newsletter from an Italian Oncology Doctores
> association that some 'Scentific Committe' answered back to
European
> Commission about the risk of tumors by EMF/Mobile Phones.
> The answer is negative: no increase of number of tumors can be
expected
> in case of 'correct' use of mobiles, below 10 years .
> If more than 10 years ... other studies should be planned !
>
> Have you heard any so bad news ?
>
> Giorgio
>

PUK
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: No risk from EFM !

PUK

In a message dated 2/15/2009 9:03:19 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
[hidden email] writes:

Hello to all !
>
> I've received a Newsletter from an Italian Oncology Doctores
> association that some 'Scentific Committe' answered back to
European
> Commission about the risk of tumors by EMF/Mobile Phones.
> The answer is negative: no increase of number of tumors can be
expected
> in case of 'correct' use of mobiles, below 10 years .
> If more than 10 years ... other studies should be planned !
>



PUK REPLIES
It is not bad news it simply confirms how ridiculous the situation is as
many people will be reaching or have reached the 10yr period after the 10yr
period the latency could be another 10-30yrs for effect. Other studies have
shown that long term use is posing some very worrying outcomes, also correct use
would probably be using the phone at least a metre from the body/head and
only for short periods it also does not subdivide the issue of young persons etc
so all the worry should be on how fooling most people are whne it comes to
being spoon fed what they would like to hear that is the everlasting battle,
the issue of passive irradiation/collateral damage is our problem, if they
could sort this out then each to his own !


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]