UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

Fog Top

 UC San Diego Professor of Medicine Dr. Beatrice Golomb, MD, PhD, has written a great letter in opposition of 5G.  She lists mechanisms by which health effects happen as a result of all types of wireless radiation (not only 5G) - i.e. oxidative stress, damage to mitochondria, damage to cell membranes, an impaired blood brain barrier, and triggering of autoimmune reactions


She explains that those who react negatively to wireless radiation (EHS) are feeling them because of physiological injury, not from psychological problems, and there has been a link to those who feel symptoms to "genetic variants in antioxidant defenses, that are less avid in defending against oxidative stress. People cannot manipulate their genes, to produce such an outcome by suggestibility."

Her complete letter, with 360 references (most of which are scientific papers on health effects of wireless radiation), are here  https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B14R6QNkmaXubmZUbWl1aERpX1E/view



-------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joel MOSKOWITZ <[hidden email]>
Date: Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 8:37 PM
Subject: 5G: UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)
To: CHE-EMF <[hidden email]>


UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

I have been hearing from scientists around the world who are deeply concerned about the deployment of fifth generation (5G) wireless technology without adequate research on the health effects of exposure to this type of radiofrequency radiation.

Professor Beatrice Golomb, MD, PhD, a professor of medicine in the School of Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, published an open letter yesterday that explains why she is vigorously opposed to SB 649, a bill in the California legislature that would expedite the deployment of "small cell" antennas to facilitate the roll-out of 5G across the state.

Dr. Golomb's letter begins with the following warning:
"I urge in the strongest terms that you vigorously oppose California SB 649.

If this bill passes, many people will suffer greatly, and needlessly, as a direct result.

This sounds like hyperbole. It is not."
In the letter, Dr. Golomb summarizes the research on the effects of exposure to radio frequency radiation and advocates for "safer, wired and well shielded technology – not more wireless." 

Appended to the letter are 360 references to the scientific literature.

A summary can be found on my EMR Safety web site at http://bit.ly/5GsaferEMR along with a link the letter.

Related Posts

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)

--

Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

Website:          http://www.saferemr.com

Facebook:        http://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR
Twitter:            @berkeleyprc


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

Miller
From LA Times "An audacious 5G power (pole) grab"

"The new mobile networks also will involve much more equipment in public view than an upstart cable TV system. Wireless companies say that the transmitters are typically the size of a pizza box or briefcase, although the bill would allow equipment up to the size of a small refrigerator."

You better keep your hands out of that fridge if you know what's good for you. And keep your hands off that pizza!

So these items would be placed periodically along the street mostly on light, or telephone polls? That's pretty invasive.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

sailplane
Miller wrote
So these items would be placed periodically along the street mostly on light, or telephone polls? That's pretty invasive.
 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB649
(f) Grants providers fair, reasonable, nondiscriminatory, and nonexclusive access to locally owned utility poles, streetlights, and other suitable host infrastructure located within the public rights-of-way and in other local public places such as stadiums, parks, campuses, hospitals, transit stations, and public buildings consistent with all applicable health and safety requirements, including Public Utilities Commission General Order 95.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: UC San Diego Medical Professor opposes "small cell" antenna bill (SB 649)

JDark
In reply to this post by Fog Top
Thank you OH SO MUCH for this letter.  I both bookmarked and down loaded.  It can help much in the wrath I get from the community.

It can be presented anywhere people may have doubts I think.  

Thanks