Toxin Buildup explained by Dr

I thought this doctor explained the toxic buildup better than anything I had thought previously.. and why it's hard to get rid of it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMpVtFUtKng

https://youtu.be/rMpVtFUtKng?t=523
We are exposed to not hundreds not thousands but tens of thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of synthetic chemical compounds

https://youtu.be/46TbbcpVfjA?t=2870
In Chemicals in the environment the risk that is typically accepted is 1/100,000 or 1/1,000,000

https://youtu.be/EC47tT-BhiY?t=624

https://www.acsh.org/news/2016/04/15/chemicals-cancer-and-common-sense-12094
They don't have a reliable test method.

Doesn't take a genius to figure out the cause of so many people with cancers does it.

And likely they only test 1 chemical on animals at a time,
but we are exposed to how many at a time ?

Merializer wrote

https://youtu.be/rMpVtFUtKng?t=523
We are exposed to not hundreds not thousands but tens of thousands perhaps hundreds of thousands of synthetic chemical compounds

https://youtu.be/46TbbcpVfjA?t=2870
In Chemicals in the environment the risk that is typically accepted is 1/100,000 or 1/1,000,000

https://youtu.be/EC47tT-BhiY?t=624

https://www.acsh.org/news/2016/04/15/chemicals-cancer-and-common-sense-12094
They don't have a reliable test method.

Doesn't take a genius to figure out the cause of so many people with cancers does it.

And likely they only test 1 chemical on animals at a time,
but we are exposed to how many at a time ?

Great summary!
Also the same thing happens with EMF. Probably hundreds of thousands of signals, but they test with 1.

They ought to expose the rats first to 50,000 chemicals, and then 10,000 various EMF signals at a time, to do a realistic test.

Also we've had 4G since 2011. Why does the NTP study use 3G?