To Marc: Rejuvenizer pendant

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

To Marc: Rejuvenizer pendant

Deb&John Holland
Marc,

The rejuvenizer pendant and the Quantum created such a turmoil in my body
when they were in my home at the same time. I was quite confused and
contacted both companies. Both responded and said the other's product was
not good (an obvious response). I then found myself back at square one as
to what to do about this situation. I couldn't stand the tense,
uncomfortable feeling any longer.

I have used muscle testing for many years with great success and decided
that was what I was going to have to do to figure out what the problem was
and which product had to go. The rejuvenizer pendant tested very strong and
positive every time and the Quantum tested VERY weak. Even when it was
turned off, it was very weak. Things only improved when it was unplugged
and placed back in the box to be shipped out the next day. Since it has
been out of my home, my peace and tranquility are back and I feel very
relaxed. What a relief!! I completely understand the feeling that you are
describing. It is quite uncomfortable. I agree that the rejuvenizer and
something else that your're using are "competing" and creating this
uncomfortable feeling. It's just a matter of finding out what that is.

Hope this helps!!

Deborah

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: To Marc: Rejuvenizer pendant

Marc Martin
Administrator
Deborah, thanks for your information about the Quantum Home combined
with the Rejuvenator pendant!

> The rejuvenizer pendant and the Quantum created such a turmoil in my body
> when they were in my home at the same time. I was quite confused and
> contacted both companies. Both responded and said the other's product was
> not good (an obvious response).

Yes, I've had that experience with almost every vendor I've contacted.
It's always the OTHER product that's bad for me... as a result, I find
that I never can truly believe anyone who is selling something.

> I have used muscle testing for many years with great success and decided
> that was what I was going to have to do to figure out what the problem was
> and which product had to go.

I have also used muscle testing for years, but with mixed results. Certainly
one of the factors for me purchasing the rejuvenizer in the first place
was my self-muscle testing. However, my muscle testing indicated that I
should have only bought the $25 "cell phone rejuvenizer", not the $150
"personal rejuvenizer" (at least at first). I ended up buying them both,
and today I'm going to experiment with just the cell phone rejuvenizer,
as the personal rejuvenizer seems too strong for me right now.

> The rejuvenizer pendant tested very strong and positive every time
> and the Quantum tested VERY weak.

I also go to an alternative health practitioner, whose muscle testing
results on me seem quite accurate. She has tested the Quantum Products
as being okay for me as long as they are kept at a distance from me.
They test weak if they are on my person (e.g. a Quantum Companion
in my pocket). She has also tested them as being okay with the
Springlife polarizers. (and she doesn't have any vested interest in
any of the products I bring in, as she's never even seen them
before!)

>Even when it was turned off, it was very weak.

This may just be the residual energy coming off it. I've found
that the Quantum Products don't seem to do much of anything when
they're turned off. I find this to be a big advantage over
other products, as I don't have to worry about where they are
stored when I'm not using them.

>I agree that the rejuvenizer and something else that your're using
>are "competing" and creating this uncomfortable feeling.

In my case, I don't think the competition between products is causing
the problem, because I believe I've felt this way when I was wearing
the rejuvenizer and there were no Quantum products around for miles!

I did receive an email back from Phyllis, and she also indicated that
I *may* have some dark stuff in my energy field which is balking
at bringing more light in. Of course, her solution to this was to
try and sell me some telepathic healing sessions, so that doesn't
help her credibility as far as I'm concerned. I may end up trying
this later, but I'm going to at least do some more experiments with
these products before trying that. But thanks for the tip about
not combining products -- I'll make sure that they get plenty of
testing by themselves!

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: To Marc: Rejuvenizer pendant

Glenn Coleman
In reply to this post by Deb&John Holland
>I have used muscle testing for many years with great success and decided
>that was what I was going to have to do to figure out what the problem was
>and which product had to go.

Which type of doctor/therapist does "muscle testing"?

Glenn

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: To Marc: Rejuvenizer pendant

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Which type of doctor/therapist does "muscle testing"?

I don't think there is any specific type of doctor/therapist
that does this... but it is fairly common in the alternative
health field. I've been to 5 different people who have
done this on me -- one was a naturapathic doctor, one
was a chiropracter, one was a nutritionist, and I'm not
sure what the other two called themselves. :-) The
technical name is "applied kinesiology", and it's more
of an art than a science I think. You can learn how
to do it on yourself, but like I mentioned, my self-testing
results have been somewhat mixed -- most likely personal
beliefs and biases getting in the way of the truth...

But it would appear that my testing on the cell phone
rejuvenizer vs. the personal rejuvenizer was indeed
correct. The cell phone rejuvenizer is more tolerable,
yet strong and effective when using the computer (so
it's not just for cell phones). However, since this
is the first day I've experimented with, I could
change my mind in the upcoming days/weeks. :-)

Marc