|
|
From ElectricalPollution.com
Please take action on the following two items. One, support Dr. Olle Johansson. The Karolinska Institute, which seems to be bowing to industry forces, is trying to drive him into retirement. Write a letter of support to the addresses below. (Here is
a link to a recent article Johansson O, "Are we really coping with the increasing amounts of airborne radiation?", LivingNow, July 2016, pp. 25-27
http://www.livingnow.com.au/articles/issues/are-we-really-coping-increasing-amounts-airborne-radiation) Two, submit comments
into the 5 dockets related to 5G. Directions are below.
Write these people asking them to support Dr. Johansson and the continuation of his important work:
The Acting Vice Chancellor, Professor Karin Dahlman-Wright at [[hidden email]]
and [[hidden email]], and with copies to the persons below.
Officers of Karolinska Institute:
Submit comments in opposition to 5G using the directions below:
Begin forwarded message:
Date:
August 30, 2016 8:05:09 AM CDT
To:
undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject:
Please Submit Comments to stop 5G Now!/Mottus and Moskowitz
Hi Everyone,
Kevin Mottus of the California Brain Tumor Association is in DC for the entire month of September lobbying Congress against 5G and wireless.
He's a passionate fighter against wireless and has spent a lot of personal funds on this issue.
Please submit comments as instructed below - need quantity (lots of comments, even short ones).
Media, decision makers, and other organizations look at these too.
Also attached below is a filing that Dr. Joel Moskowitz (UC Berkeley) has submitted on this.
Please submit your comments as soon as you can this week (deadline is September 30), BUT Kevin has started visiting Congress already.
Thank You,
Angela
---------------------------------------------------------
From Kevin Mottus:
Submit your comments regarding additional frequencies within the
5G spectrum that the FCC is going to vote on within 24-70 GHz as well as even higher spectrums
71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 95 GHz. Please follow the instructions below, it will allow you to comment on 5 different dockets at once. You may want to comment specifically on the ways they want to use this 5G technology such as:
"machine-to-machine communications, healthcare devices, autonomous driving cars, and home and office automation." See link for more information: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2016/db0728/FCC-16-89A1.pdf
Media, decision makers and other organizations definitely look at these comments. Please submit
many many individual, small comments with attachments because it seems that it's more about the number of comments than the nature of the comments."
The deadline is September 30th but please begin submitting now!
It will help to have these comments on the record to refer to as I visit with individual congress members in person now and demand they stop the roll out of 5G!!
Follow These Instructions to Make Comments:
2. Click on "Submit a Filing" Tab at the top of the page.
3. Click on "Express a Comment" (on top of the page) to just make a comment or "Standard Filing" to attach documents (one of which can be your comment).
4. You can make one comment for all five docket numbers at once. Simply type in or Copy and Paste each of these Docket numbers one at a time into the "Proceedings" Field and make sure they are accurately displayed in the window: 14-177,
15-256, RM-11664, 10-112, 97-95
5. Fill out all required fields and
click "Enter" or "Return" before you go to the next field.
6. Once all fields are filled our - click continue screen.
7. Review and submit.
8. Make sure you write down
your confirmation # so that you can check on your submission.
Thank you for your help and support. If you have any questions email [hidden email].
Kevin Mottus
California Brain Tumor Association
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Dr. Moskowitz
From: Joel MOSKOWITZ <[hidden email]>
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:17 PM
Subject: FCC needs input regarding allocation of spectrum for 5G
To: CHE-EMF
The FCC needs your input regarding allocation of spectrum for 5G.
Submit your comments regarding allocation of additional frequencies within the 5G spectrum that the FCC is going to vote on including 24-70 GHz as well as higher spectrum: 71-76 GHz, 81-86 GHz and 95 GHz.
See Electromagnetic Radiation Safety for simple instructions on how to comment on five different dockets at once. You may want to comment specifically on the ways they want to use 5G technology such
as: "machine-to-machine communications, healthcare devices, autonomous driving cars, and home and office automation."
http://bit.ly/FCC5Ginput
For more information see: http://bit.ly/FCC16-89A1
--
I submitted the following express comment today:
In light of your upcoming votes on allocation of additional spectrum for 5G, I want to draw your attention to the International EMF Scientist Appeal ( https://EMFscientist.org)
which calls for stronger regulatory standards on radio frequency (RF) emissions.
The Appeal has been signed by 221 scientists from 41 nations. All of these scientists have published peer-reviewed research on electromagnetic fields and biology or health.
The FCC's RF guidelines were adopted 20 years ago. Many scientists and health professionals believe these guidelines do not protect the population from non-thermal health risks due to RF radiation exposure. To ensure public health and safety, the FCC should
commission an independent review of the biologic and health research to determine stringent RF standards before allowing additional spectrum to be used for new commercial applications.
I also wish to remind you that the FCC has yet to act on NOI #13-84, "Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies," issued in 2013 and a similar NOI issued a decade earlier. The 2013 NOI has received more than
900 submissions--almost all call for stronger regulation of RF radiation. Links to key submissions can be found on the Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website at http://www.saferemr.com/2014/08/part-i-why-we-need-stronger-cell-phone.html.
Finally, the General Accountability Office issued a report entitled, “Exposure and Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should Be Reassessed” (GAO-12-771: Published: Jul 24, 2012. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-771).
The report made the following recommendations which have yet to be addressed by the FCC:
“FCC should formally reassess and, if appropriate, change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone testing requirements related to likely usage configurations, particularly when phones are held against the body. FCC noted that a draft document
currently under consideration by FCC has the potential to address GAO’s recommendations.”
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emfcontacts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
[hidden email].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emfcontacts/CAAC%3DT7dF99hmz_G7rGTX-qL1%3DShFbcf1XT0aW%3D7G7pwNsZsuKA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
|
Locked
