Administrator
|
> By the way, Drasko, before asking about their claims, you may
> want to read this page, which lists several claims: > > http://advancedliving.com/QSciTest.ivnu Oh wait, I now see that on the new website (natural-stress-reduction.com), the claim list is more detailed: http://www.natural-stress-reduction.com/summary-of-research.html And there are other statistics here: http://www.natural-stress-reduction.com/scientific-revolution.html I remember that just a few months ago, this website had a page devoted to electrical sensitivity. For some reason, that page is now gone... :-( Marc |
Marc, Thank you for the info, I was not aware of all the aspects regarding Quantum... You know, I thought it was one of the miracoulous devices that has no physical correlations, but this one is a kind of similar to Stetzer, it does have some meaurable physical effects... But I was suprised to find out it emitts something so as to enable effects! So it is not passive like most of other devices! I understood you were reluctant to use active devices? Drasko ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Martin" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 7:19 AM Subject: Re: [eSens] Stetzer/ Quantum > > By the way, Drasko, before asking about their claims, you may > > want to read this page, which lists several claims: > > > > http://advancedliving.com/QSciTest.ivnu > > Oh wait, I now see that on the new website (natural-stress-reduction.com), > the claim list is more detailed: > > http://www.natural-stress-reduction.com/summary-of-research.html > > And there are other statistics here: > > http://www.natural-stress-reduction.com/scientific-revolution.html > > I remember that just a few months ago, this website had a page > devoted to electrical sensitivity. For some reason, that page > is now gone... :-( > > Marc > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > |
Administrator
|
> But I was suprised to find out it emitts something so as to enable
> effects! So it is not passive like most of other devices! I ] > understood you were reluctant to use active devices? I'm not reluctant to use active devices. I know that some people don't like to use devices which emit an EMF field, because they feel that all EMF fields are bad. I don't believe that, however, and focus merely on what works for me. That said, the devices from Quantum Products which work the best for me are the ones which don't have a transmitter built into them. That is, the Quantum Powerstrip and the Quantum MiniMax don't have any transmitter -- they are just regular Fiskars/ Power Sentry power outlets which have received the material treatment process. They seem to affect about a 7' radius around them, which is good enough for problem areas like where the computer is and where the TV is. Also, the seem to affect the entire house, so I assume the effect spreads backwards to the fusebox. Marc |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the walls. I do still have a clarus negative ion generator that I have for several years and I think it does a good job and creates a good effect. And I have found that the pocket version of their clocks when placed between thick layers of velostat has a good effect as well. But then again, I have to be careful not to get too much of it. --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > > Again, thanks for the info about the quantum products. I couldn't > > find anything on google searches like what you were talking about. > > Yeah, the company that makes the Quantum Products has not been > very good at marketing. I think the other company that took > their technology and targetted the audio/video industry is > doing a better job at marketing. > > Also, I see that there yet another company that makes somewhat > similar products, although much more expensive and probably > only for the rich audio/videophiles: > > http://www.bybeeconnection.com/ourtech.asp > > Marc |
Administrator
|
> I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the
> prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice > that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the > air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot > radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason > that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the > walls. You may want to check with the folks who make the Quantum Pro, because I believe that the Quantum Pro works in the same way as the Symphony, Clarus Clocks, etc. That is, I believe it transmits a coherent field which alters EMF in the air and in the wires. Marc |
I'm reading about the product and I don't see any mention whatsoever
of it emitting any kind of frequencies into the environment. All I read is that it goes to work on the wiring within the walls and they speak of their power strips as filters. If what you say is true then I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. Thanks. --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > > I was searching and coming up with the audio video products and the > > prices were very different than the one you were quoting. I notice > > that the symphony pro, etc. by that company do put a frequency in the > > air to modify or cancel or harmonize products in a 50 or so foot > > radius. I would not be interested in their products for the reason > > that I'm only wanting to modify, harmonize, etc. the wiring in the > > walls. > > You may want to check with the folks who make the Quantum Pro, > because I believe that the Quantum Pro works in the same way > as the Symphony, Clarus Clocks, etc. That is, I believe > it transmits a coherent field which alters EMF in the air > and in the wires. > > Marc |
Administrator
|
> I'm reading about the product and I don't see any mention whatsoever
> of it emitting any kind of frequencies into the environment. It's my understanding that the audio/video products on QuantumQRT.com are derived from the same technology as the Quantum Pro. So if the description on QuantumQRT.com says it broadcasts coherent waves, then I would think that the Quantum Pro does as well. I certainly could be wrong about this, though -- for example, on AdvancedLiving.com, they talk about an extra antenna that could be added to the Quantum Pro, so perhaps the standard Quantum Pro has no antenna. By the way, I've owned a Quantum Pro for 4 years, and have used it at work. I'd say its overkill for a house, though. Marc |
Anybody has the feeling that homeopathic remedies don't work with esens
people? Is there a sort of "resistance" at the energetic medicine? Daniele ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it |
Hello Daniele,
homeopathic remedies do work with esens people. The catch is however, that in HF radiation areas, the working of homeopathic remedies is very small. And that goes for all people, esens or not. And that goes for all remedies. If you do have cancer, all remedies are hinderd in their work as long as the patient remains in a HF radiated area. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Norton Antivirus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dudos" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:47 Subject: [eSens] homeopathic remedy and esens > Anybody has the feeling that homeopathic remedies don't work with esens > people? > Is there a sort of "resistance" at the energetic medicine? > > Daniele > |
In reply to this post by dudos999
My first real relief came from Homeopathic Radiation drops. Sulfur also
helped greatly. There were a few others along the way that gave some relief. I think homeopathics are one part that can be very useful. Andrew On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Dudos wrote: > Anybody has the feeling that homeopathic remedies don't work with esens > people? > Is there a sort of "resistance" at the energetic medicine? > > Daniele > > > > > > > ___________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB > http://mail.yahoo.it > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > |
In reply to this post by dudos999
Hello,
I have voluntarily exposed homeopathic high potencies to the radiation of a mobile phone. It is destroyed within seconds. Even at a distance of 40 cm it will loose 25% of its value within 30 seconds. Even a normal tranformer for halogen illumination of 12 Volts 70 Watt will have a similiar effect, 20% loss in 1 hour at a distance of 1 meter. This happens only, if you have no eletrosmog neutralizer on the mobile or the fuse box. Dietrich Gruen There are ways, to avoid this. They have to start in the companies producing homeopthic remedies. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by quaixemen
> If what you say is true then
> I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and > not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure > to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it > puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. Well, I for one will be very interested to hear the results of your experimentation -- it sounds like you have hundreds of dollars worth of stuff from Clarus, Stetzer, and Quantum, and it will be interesting to hear what works best. Marc |
In reply to this post by Andrew McAfee
I had some homeopathy radiation tablets given to me once that helped a
lot with the sunburn from pc monitors. Haven't located any that worked like that again though. No name or anything on the ones I was given either. The mention of sulfur reminded me, that my chiro. had suggested 120mcg.of molybdenum, 3x/day to start with, for my chemical sensitivities, which it really helps, but I notice it does seem to lessen the sensitivity to emf's as well, so just thought I'd mention it. And has anyone tried the epsom salt/baking soda baths, or the bleach baths for excessive radiation to help relieve just the daily amounts we get exposed to? I've done foot baths with epsom and dead sea salts, and it does seem somehow beneficial. I've actually aborted a few migraines with the dead sea salts. Just learned that by coincidence. ~Snoshoe --- In [hidden email], Andrew McAfee <amcafeerr@n...> wrote: > My first real relief came from Homeopathic Radiation drops. Sulfur also > helped greatly. There were a few others along the way that gave some > relief. > I think homeopathics are one part that can be very useful. > Andrew > On Aug 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Dudos wrote: > > > Anybody has the feeling that homeopathic remedies don't work with esens > > people? > > Is there a sort of "resistance" at the energetic medicine? > > > > Daniele |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I got to use it for the first time last night when I got home. I know that my Q-Link clocks would max out my trifield meter on the electromagnetic scales. I barely get a reading (around 1) with the quantum pro. And that could be from just the unit itself and not something that it is emitting into the air. And I have to put the trifield up pretty close to it before getting a reading. I put it on its highest setting to see how it would make me feel. Unless i develop some side effects in the future it seems like a keeper. At that price I hope it lasts for a long time and doesn't break in a year or two. Yes, I'm sure, like many people in this group I've tried all kinds of stuff. I think those stetzer filters are fantastic and will surely be buying more. And I really like what I'm feeling with those polarizers. Two devices I've got from this group. I still use the Q-Link ally. I have a hat that has a zipper in it near the top. It has thick layers of velostat in the top and also in a layer that touches the head. Placing the ally in between the layers produces a good effect. But I can't leave it on for all that long. Velostat also has a good effect. It shields from microwaves. I wear hats with them in it and also have a pair of boxer underwear that is lined with it. It covers my tailbone. My head and my tailbone seem to be very sensitive to electrosmog. --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > > If what you say is true then > > I can see why you would prefer the power strips or the home unit and > > not the quantum pro device. Just in case you are right I will be sure > > to not damage the box and not throw it away. I will return it if it > > puts more electricity into the air like a clarus clock. > > Well, I for one will be very interested to hear the results of your > experimentation -- it sounds like you have hundreds of dollars > worth of stuff from Clarus, Stetzer, and Quantum, and it will > be interesting to hear what works best. > > Marc |
Administrator
|
> My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I put it on its highest
> setting to see how it would make me feel. The highest setting? Yikes! I find that I really have to be careful to not overdo it with these devices -- having too much is just as bad as having too little. Fortunately with the Quantum Products, there is quite a range in variability in strength among all the various products (although I think the Companion is too weak to be of much use) Marc |
Yep, its on the highest setting. And I feel good too. Less noise in
the walls = less noise in the head. The stetzer filters don't do anything to the lower frequencies. I had a hunch the quantum pro would work IF it did what it claimed to do in the way that it claimed it does. Cleaning up the lower frequencies appears to be necessary as well. My breaker box is located in the bedroom of the house, being a trailer, and not on the far wall of the garage. The highest setting appears to be necessary. A 400 dollar quantum pro is a lot cheaper than moving. By the way, I don't see any kind of hook up on it for an antennae. Maybe the newer devices are different than the ones sold 4 years ago. Take care. --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > > My quantum pro arrived yesterday morning. I put it on its highest > > setting to see how it would make me feel. > > The highest setting? Yikes! I find that I really have to be careful > to not overdo it with these devices -- having too much is just as > bad as having too little. Fortunately with the Quantum Products, > there is quite a range in variability in strength among all the > various products (although I think the Companion is too weak > to be of much use) > > Marc |
Administrator
|
> By the way, I don't see any kind of hook up on it for
> an antennae. Maybe the newer devices are different than the ones sold > 4 years ago. Mine doesn't have a hookup for an antenna either -- it seems that there is a variation of the Quantum Pro that has an antenna jack. I see a couple variations of the Quantum Pro being offered for sale at AdvancedLiving.com And since the folks at Quantum Products are claiming that they are constantly improving their devices, it wouldn't surprise me if yours is different than my 4-year-old model. Marc |
In reply to this post by Gruendg
(To Dietrich) What form were the homeopathic remedies in? Solid,
liquid, or both? (To all) from discussions I've been a part of with a group of homeopathy teachers and students, it has been our experience that some remedies were still viable after being irradiated for several seconds in airport X-ray scanners. I only say 'some' because there wasn't a coordinated experiment before the discussion and only some of the remedies were tried soon after X-ray exposure, like the person's current personal remedy. If it turned out later that another remedy didn't work we couldn't be sure if it was due to erasure at the airport, erasure at a different time, or not being the appropriate remedy. Also, it turned out that those remedies which were in granule surface deposition form weathered the X-ray exposure best. Remedy energies being held in liquid it appeared were more likely to be erased. (Post-exposure potency wasn't measured exactly either -- the remedy either reportedly worked or it didn't.) This collection of rough data made sense to me since most commercially available remedy energies are first caught in a polar liquid, like water or alcohol, especially the EM radiation remedies like Electricitas or X-ray. Those remedy energies being held in crystal form on granule surfaces would (at first guess) be harder to erase since the remedy energy structure is held in a solid instead of a liquid. On the topic of radiation effecting remedy activity, it is stated in homeopathic literature that direct exposure to sunlight erases homeopathic remedies. You can easily verify sunlight's erasing effect. How fast for each remedy, and how it depends on potency or carrier type, I haven't come across. But an individual who takes a homeopathic remedy can usually handle a previously known healthy time-exposure to the sun, for that individual, without any curtailing of remedy action. (On HF radiation areas and homeopathic energies) HF frequencies are commonly stated as being in a band from around 3 to 30 MHz. Microwave frequencies are roughly from around 1 GHz to 300 GHz. (1 GHz = 1000 MHz) Cell phones and wireless networks operate in a low frequency microwave band (approximately 850 MHz through 5 GHz, though the upper range keeps being extended for newer wireless transmissions). UV rays and X-rays are of much higher frequency than this. Though, the energy per photon for UV rays and X-rays is thousands (for UV) to millions (for X-rays) of times higher than for microwaves, microwaves have the property of resonating with polar liquids (like water), or molecules with dipole moments in liquids (such as some organic molecules in water). As the human body is composed mainly of water, the basic action of a homeopathic remedy on the physical level is thought by some to be similar to how the remedy energy is captured in the first place; i.e., through transference and propagation of its energy signature by impression on the water in the human body via the water's polar properties. [See "Homeopathy: Science or Myth?" by Dr. Bill Gray for some info on this. Dr. Gray is a physician and graduate of the Stanford Medical school who became a homeopath after seeing first-hand the inadequacies of allopathic medicine. Also, the energy signature acquiring properties of water can be graphically seen in "The Hidden Messages in Water" by Dr. Masaru Emoto.] Since microwave emissions strongly interact with the human body via water's polar mechanism, too, this could explain the stronger interference effect microwaves have on homeopathic remedy treatment as compared with X-rays and sunlight. This mode of microwave/water interaction also highlights the danger wireless transmissions have on the body in general. -Beau --- In [hidden email], Gruendg@a... wrote: > Hello, > I have voluntarily exposed homeopathic high potencies to the radiation of a > mobile phone. It is destroyed within seconds. Even at a distance of 40 cm it > will loose 25% of its value within 30 seconds. Even a normal tranformer for > halogen illumination of 12 Volts 70 Watt will have a similiar effect, 20% loss in > 1 hour at a distance of 1 meter. This happens only, if you have no eletrosmog > neutralizer on the mobile or the fuse box. > > Dietrich Gruen > > There are ways, to avoid this. They have to start in the companies producing > homeopthic remedies. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
Hi all, I too, am new here.
Since I see many of you mention Mercury as a possible culprit, I just wanted to let you know that Mercury chelation didn't really help my sensitivities in this area. In fact, especially during the chelation process, many of my symptoms worsened. So if you are keeping yourself in a perpetual state of chelation, you may be even more sensitive. Cheers, *S* --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > By the way Sharon, if you're looking for an explanation > for what is causing your reaction to cellphones and > computers, it seems that there are all sorts of > contradictory theories. And I suppose that different > people are reacting for different reasons. In my > own case, I subscribe to the theory that exposure > to the EMF fields opens > up your "blood-brain barrier", which allows toxins > (like mercury, etc.) entry into your brain and > central nervous system. So a longterm solution > would be to "Detoxify", but I can assure you > that this is easier said than done, and will take > a long time, and require a lot of money (e.g, > getting all of your silver dental fillings > removed is one typical step along the way). Short > term solutions involve avoidance of the EMF > fields, or transforming them into something > less harmful with devices, or building up your > resistance to them with diet, better nutrition, > excercise, etc. > > Marc |
Hi all,
still of the opinion there is something spiritual going on here. so the key is not to completely rid yourself of various metals, but to find balance in the brain hemispheres/extremes of consiousness, and seek spiritual transformation so the spiritual fire transmutes the metals in a purer form. keywords for a google could be mercury, ascension alchemy or maybe philosophers stone... really!! not entirely sure but the electronic belt probably is what we are dealing with here.. this does not mean you need to have knowledge of all these principles, to attain, i hope,,,. Man the microcosm is a good article on-line where there is a pretty good theoretical framework and i just started looking a little at alchemy again// Love and Joy Sue <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, I too, am new here. Since I see many of you mention Mercury as a possible culprit, I just wanted to let you know that Mercury chelation didn't really help my sensitivities in this area. In fact, especially during the chelation process, many of my symptoms worsened. So if you are keeping yourself in a perpetual state of chelation, you may be even more sensitive. Cheers, *S* --- In [hidden email], "Marc Martin" <marc@u...> wrote: > By the way Sharon, if you're looking for an explanation > for what is causing your reaction to cellphones and > computers, it seems that there are all sorts of > contradictory theories. And I suppose that different > people are reacting for different reasons. In my > own case, I subscribe to the theory that exposure > to the EMF fields opens > up your "blood-brain barrier", which allows toxins > (like mercury, etc.) entry into your brain and > central nervous system. So a longterm solution > would be to "Detoxify", but I can assure you > that this is easier said than done, and will take > a long time, and require a lot of money (e.g, > getting all of your silver dental fillings > removed is one typical step along the way). Short > term solutions involve avoidance of the EMF > fields, or transforming them into something > less harmful with devices, or building up your > resistance to them with diet, better nutrition, > excercise, etc. > > Marc SPONSORED LINKS Article health wellness Center for health and wellness Health and wellness Health and wellness program Health wellness product Health and wellness job --------------------------------- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "eSens" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [hidden email] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |