Self introduction and message from Spain

> Welcome to the group!
>
> As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in
> the
> group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the origins
> of
> EHS.
>
> My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems to
> weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
>
> Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in worsening
> tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are magnesium
> sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of
> bb_physics_phd
> Sent: 21 June 2007 02:44
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being biophysics)
> and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> (Y-shield).
>
> I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower down,
> the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find warm
> baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> for a while after I knew I had this problem).
>
> I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> behind EHS.
>
> For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> woman in London, it's at
> abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> their web site
> and you can play the video on the right.
>
> I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
>
> 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
>
> The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony aerials,
> radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
>
> That day several organizations of people affected,
> neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need for
> a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> activities.
>
> As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa Mara
> de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep concern
> about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
>
> There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> transformers and electric infrastructures.
>
> We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances, land
> specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> electromagnetic fields.
>
> Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> There are many international forums that warn of the possible effects
> and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998, Salzburg
> 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002, Freiburg
> 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and scientific
> programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
>
> Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> national and independent research with epidemiological studies of the
> public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes
> mentioned
> in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>  
>  

>
> Welcome to the group!
>
> As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in the
> group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the origins of
> EHS.
>
> My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems to
> weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
>
> Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in worsening
> tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are magnesium
> sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> bb_physics_phd
> Sent: 21 June 2007 02:44
> To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being biophysics)
> and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> (Y-shield).
>
> I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower down,
> the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find warm
> baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> for a while after I knew I had this problem).
>
> I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> behind EHS.
>
> For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> woman in London, it's at abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> their web site
> and you can play the video on the right.
>
> I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
>
> 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
>
> The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony aerials,
> radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
>
> That day several organizations of people affected,
> neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need for
> a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> activities.
>
> As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa Mara
> de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep concern
> about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
>
> There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> transformers and electric infrastructures.
>
> We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances, land
> specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> electromagnetic fields.
>
> Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> There are many international forums that warn of the possible effects
> and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998, Salzburg
> 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002, Freiburg
> 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and scientific
> programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
>
> Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> national and independent research with epidemiological studies of the
> public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes mentioned
> in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>

> Interesting. I am beginning to suspect a chemical component as well.
> Here in the states everything has fire retardant, etc.
>
> I do wake up feeling better when I sleep outdoors. Is there a
> straightforward
> test for MCS?
>
> Bill
>
> On 6/24/07, Ian Kemp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome to the group!
> >
> > As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in
> the
> > group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the
> origins of
> > EHS.
> >
> > My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> > sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems
> to
> > weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
> >
> > Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in
> worsening
> > tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> > experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are
> magnesium
> > sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> > [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> > bb_physics_phd
> > Sent: 21 June 2007 02:44
> > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being
> biophysics)
> > and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> > clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> > before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> > and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> > they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> > harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> > after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> > claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> > (Y-shield).
> >
> > I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower
> down,
> > the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find
> warm
> > baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> > taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> > Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> > the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> > also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> > designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> > they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> > keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> > for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> > for a while after I knew I had this problem).
> >
> > I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> > behind EHS.
> >
> > For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> > woman in London, it's at
> abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> > their web site
> > and you can play the video on the right.
> >
> > I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
> >
> > 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
> >
> > The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> > pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> > and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony
> aerials,
> > radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
> >
> > That day several organizations of people affected,
> > neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> > against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> > associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> > infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> > environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need
> for
> > a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> > activities.
> >
> > As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> > frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> > substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> > installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa
> Mara
> > de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> > -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> > interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep
> concern
> > about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> > uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
> >
> > There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> > against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> > generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> > Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> > transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> > significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> > households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> > against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> > exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> > generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> > transformers and electric infrastructures.
> >
> > We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> > Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> > lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> > legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances,
> land
> > specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> > areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields.
> >
> > Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> > field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> > telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> > all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> > There are many international forums that warn of the possible
> effects
> > and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998,
> Salzburg
> > 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002,
> Freiburg
> > 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and
> scientific
> > programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> > sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> > wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
> >
> > Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> > national and independent research with epidemiological studies of
> the
> > public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> > based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> > exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes
> mentioned
> > in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> > Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> > regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>  
>  

> Interesting. I am beginning to suspect a chemical component as well.
> Here in the states everything has fire retardant, etc.
>
> I do wake up feeling better when I sleep outdoors. Is there a
> straightforward
> test for MCS?
>
> Bill
>
> On 6/24/07, Ian Kemp <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome to the group!
> >
> > As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in
> the
> > group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the
> origins of
> > EHS.
> >
> > My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> > sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems
> to
> > weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
> >
> > Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in
> worsening
> > tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> > experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are
> magnesium
> > sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> > [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> > bb_physics_phd
> > Sent: 21 June 2007 02:44
> > To: [hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being
> biophysics)
> > and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> > clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> > before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> > and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> > they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> > harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> > after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> > claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> > (Y-shield).
> >
> > I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower
> down,
> > the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find
> warm
> > baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> > taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> > Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> > the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> > also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> > designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> > they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> > keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> > for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> > for a while after I knew I had this problem).
> >
> > I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> > behind EHS.
> >
> > For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> > woman in London, it's at
> abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> > their web site
> > and you can play the video on the right.
> >
> > I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
> >
> > 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
> >
> > The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> > pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> > and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony
> aerials,
> > radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
> >
> > That day several organizations of people affected,
> > neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> > against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> > associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> > infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> > environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need
> for
> > a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> > activities.
> >
> > As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> > frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> > substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> > installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa
> Mara
> > de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> > -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> > interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep
> concern
> > about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> > uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
> >
> > There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> > against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> > generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> > Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> > transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> > significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> > households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> > against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> > exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> > generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> > transformers and electric infrastructures.
> >
> > We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> > Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> > lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> > legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances,
> land
> > specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> > areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields.
> >
> > Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> > field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> > telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> > all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> > There are many international forums that warn of the possible
> effects
> > and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998,
> Salzburg
> > 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002,
> Freiburg
> > 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and
> scientific
> > programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> > sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> > wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
> >
> > Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> > national and independent research with epidemiological studies of
> the
> > public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> > based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> > exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes
> mentioned
> > in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> > Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> > regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>

>
> Welcome to the group!
>
> As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in the
> group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the origins of
> EHS.
>
> My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems to
> weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
>
> Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in worsening
> tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are magnesium
> sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com

> Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being biophysics)
> and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> (Y-shield).
>
> I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower down,
> the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find warm
> baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> for a while after I knew I had this problem).
>
> I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> behind EHS.
>
> For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> woman in London, it's at abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> their web site
> and you can play the video on the right.
>
> I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
>
> 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
>
> The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony aerials,
> radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
>
> That day several organizations of people affected,
> neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need for
> a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> activities.
>
> As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa Mara
> de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep concern
> about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
>
> There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> transformers and electric infrastructures.
>
> We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances, land
> specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> electromagnetic fields.
>
> Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> There are many international forums that warn of the possible effects
> and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998, Salzburg
> 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002, Freiburg
> 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and scientific
> programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
>
> Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> national and independent research with epidemiological studies of the
> public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes mentioned
> in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

> I think if you're asking the question at all, it probably means you
> don't
> have severe MCS. Symptoms can include severe headaches, severe mental
> fogginess, asthma/choking or a sudden worsening of the tinnitus.
> These come
> on rapidly after exposure to things like strong perfume, organic
> solvents
> and various chemicals. In general about 75% of people with ES seem to
> have
> MCS as well, and the MCS usually happens first. So maybe you're one
> of the
> other 25%.
>
> It does make life easier if you haven't got MCS as well. However, as
> both
> seem to be associated with immune system problems in lots of people,
> it may
> be sensible to avoid high exposures of chemicals, solvents,
> pesticides etc
> just in case it triggers something. People with MCS seem to get ES
> more
> easily, so I guess the reverse might also happen.
>
> On the other hand there are a few people who seem to have developed
> ES due
> to high and prolonged exposures to various forms of EMF but are
> otherwise
> healthy and do not appear to react to chemicals. The most high-profile
> example is Brian Stein (chief executive of a UK food company).
>
> Ian
>
> _____
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
> Of Bill
> Bruno
> Sent: 25 June 2007 15:27
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
>
> Interesting. I am beginning to suspect a chemical component as well.
> Here in the states everything has fire retardant, etc.
>
> I do wake up feeling better when I sleep outdoors. Is there a
> straightforward
> test for MCS?
>
> Bill
>
> On 6/24/07, Ian Kemp <ianandsue.kemp@
> <mailto:ianandsue.kemp%40ukgateway.net> ukgateway.net> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome to the group!
> >
> > As you'll see from the replies so far, and the archived messages in
> the
> > group, there are several different interwoven ideas about the
> origins of
> > EHS.
> >
> > My first question would be, do you also have MCS (multiple chemical
> > sensitivity) or immune system disorders? For many people this seems
> to
> > weaken the body so that it becomes susceptible to EMF.
> >
> > Low magnesium levels are sometimes suggested as a factor in
> worsening
> > tinnitus (e.g. by Breakspear Hospital UK). This could fit with your
> > experience of benefiting from salt baths, as Epsom salts are
> magnesium
> > sulphate and should absorb through the skin.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com
> <eSens%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:
> > eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com
> <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> > bb_physics_phd
> > Sent: 21 June 2007 02:44
> > To: eSens@yahoogroups. <mailto:eSens%40yahoogroups.com> com
> <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [eSens] Self introduction and message from Spain
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I honestly do have a Ph.D. in physics (my sub-field being
> biophysics)
> > and I am, as of the last few months, electrically sensitive. My most
> > clear symptom is tinnitus which reached Class 5 ("Catastrophic")
> > before I started avoiding exposure. I can 'hear' cell phone towers,
> > and often know where they (and verify it with a meter) even when
> > they're fairly well disguised. I'm also affected by ELF (60 Hz +
> > harmonics) fields, but the onset seems to be more gradual, peaking
> > after several hours. I have shielded my car windows (manufacturer
> > claims tint tests 30+ dB for microwaves) and part of my house
> > (Y-shield).
> >
> > I get relief from lying on the ground in my back yard (the lower
> down,
> > the less microwaves, and out of the house, less ELF. I also find
> warm
> > baths with a bit of salt (I use epsom + sea mixed) help. I started
> > taking Ginko and I think that may help. Also recommend Melatonin.
> > Tried other stuff with no clear results. I do also find that wearing
> > the 'silver lining scarf' over my head helps in many situations. I
> > also now wear gloves when I use the computer--the ones I have are
> > designed to conduct static charge. I do think (or possibly imagine)
> > they help my hands not get tense. I probably will never use a laptop
> > keyboard again (try holding a radio or a meter up to one). Same goes
> > for cell phones and cordless phones (I did use them on speaker mode
> > for a while after I knew I had this problem).
> >
> > I am interested in trying to figure out the biophysical mechanism
> > behind EHS.
> >
> > For those who missed the Good Morning America show about the EHS
> > woman in London, it's at
> abcnews.go.com/GMA/Technology/story?id=3289619
> > their web site
> > and you can play the video on the right.
> >
> > I just found out that this Sunday has been declared:
> >
> > 24 JUNE INTERNATIONAL DAY AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC POLLUTION
> >
> > The 24th June is the international day against electromagnetic
> > pollution. Electromagnetic pollution is a continuous exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields generated mainly by high-voltage power lines
> > and electric power substations, but also by mobile telephony
> aerials,
> > radio links, and telecommunication systems (Wifi, Wimax).
> >
> > That day several organizations of people affected,
> > neighbourhood associations and environmentalists want to complain
> > against the unsustainable increase of electromagnetic pollution
> > associated with the uncontrolled proliferation of electric
> > infrastructures and telecommunications networks, which has become an
> > environmental and public health problem, and we advocate the need
> for
> > a thorough review of the regulations that apply to this type of
> > activities.
> >
> > As for the electromagnetic pollution generated by low
> > frequency electromagnetic fields (power lines and electric
> > substations), neighbourhood actions against projects for the
> > installation of a substation in both Patraix (Valencia) and Santa
> Mara
> > de Grado (Asturias), or the struggle against power lines in Lada
> > -Velilla (Asturias- Len), or the project to develop a high-tension
> > interconnection with France in Catalu1a are examples of a deep
> concern
> > about the impacts and possible public health effects of this
> > uncontrolled and chaotic proliferation in rural and urban areas.
> >
> > There are also legal actions, such as the sentence
> > against an electric company based on the electromagnetic pollution
> > generated by a transformer in Murcia, and the resolution of the
> > Audiencia Provincial de Castelln that forced the dismantlement of a
> > transformer in Burriana considering that there was reasonable and
> > significant evidence to prove that the level of exposure in the
> > households was a risk factor. These actions reveal a long fight
> > against the environmental and public health impacts of a continuous
> > exposure to low frequency electromagnetic fields, such as those
> > generated by high or medium voltage power lines, substations,
> > transformers and electric infrastructures.
> >
> > We believe a significant change is needed in the 1997 Electric
> > Sector Law and in the regulations that apply to high voltage power
> > lines and electric substations as well as in the autonomous region
> > legislation, introducing precaution criteria, security distances,
> land
> > specifically reserved for these infrastructures outside residential
> > areas and a significant reduction of the levels of exposure to
> > electromagnetic fields.
> >
> > Protests against the high frequency electromagnetic
> > field emissions and the pulsating microwaves created by mobile
> > telephony aerials and telecommunication systems has been continuous
> > all over Spain, against national regulations dictated by operators.
> > There are many international forums that warn of the possible
> effects
> > and risks for the public health (Declarations of Vienna 1998,
> Salzburg
> > 2000, Roccaraso 2000, Alcal=E1 de Henares 2002, Catania 2002,
> Freiburg
> > 2002, Benevento 2006). European epidemiological studies and
> scientific
> > programmes such as REFLEX warn us of the changes at cellular and
> > sub-cellular level with the subsequent negative consequences for
> > wildlife, the environment and the health of human beings.
> >
> > Therefore, it is essential to develop a programme and a public,
> > national and independent research with epidemiological studies of
> the
> > public health effects, and a thorough review of current regulations
> > based on public involvement in the positioning of aerials and public
> > exposure limits that prevent the diseases and cellular changes
> mentioned
> > in those studies. It is also necessary to change the General
> > Telecommunications Law and the national and autonomous region
> > regulations with regard to the radio electric space.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>  
>