Report on Possible Impacts of Communication Towers on Wildlife Including Birds a

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Report on Possible Impacts of Communication Towers on Wildlife Including Birds a

surpriseshan2
 
Report on Possible  Impacts of Communication Towers on  Wildlife Including
Birds and Bees
Expert Group studies possible impacts of communication towers on  Wildlife
including Birds & Bees
After careful  screening that involved deletion of duplicate records and
addition of  new
references, the  1080 references initially compiled for the analysis of
literature (which formed  the base for our overview) were reduced to 919
references. These final 919 study  reports are used here for the present final
analysis.  
The studies were  broadly classified based on the subject organisms into
four  categories-
Birds, Bees, Other  Animals (including wildlife) and humans. Based on the
study’s  findings regarding the impact of EMFs on the subject, each category
was further  subdivided into three groups- Impact, No Impact or Neutral/
Inconclusive, as  given in table 3 below. As noted below  majority of the  
studies reported negative impacts by EMFs.  
Table 3.  Number of research studies (collected from Open access  
Bibliographic
databases)  collected and collated based on the study subjects and results  
-
Page  11  919 TOTAL STUDIES;  593 IMPACT; 130 NO IMPACT; 196  NEUTRAL
Conclusion:  The review of existing literature shows that the EMRs are
interfering with the  biological systems in more ways than one and there had
already been some warning  bells sounded in the case on bees (Warnke 2007;
vanEngelsdorp et al. 2010; Gould  1980; Sharma and Neelima R  Kumar  2010) and
birds, which probably heralds the seriousness of this issue and  indicates
the vulnerability of other species as well. Despite a few reassuring  reports
(Galloni et al. 2005), a vast majority of published literature indicate  
deleterious effects of EMFs in various species. The window of frequency range  
and exposure time required to make measurable impacts would vary widely
among  species.  
Microwave  and radiofrequency pollution appears to constitute a potential
cause for the decline  of animal populations (Balmori 2006; Balmori and
Hallberg 2007; Balmori Martínez 2003;  Joris and Dirk 2007; Summers-Smith 2003)
and deterioration of health of plants  and humans  living near radiation
sources such as phone masts. Studies have indicated the  significant non-thermal
long-term impacts of EMFs on species, especially at  genetic level which
can lead to various health complications including brain  tumours (glioma),
reduction in sperm counts and sperm mobility, congenital  deformities,
Psychiatric problems (stress, ‘ringxity’, sleep disorders, memory  loss etc.) and
endocrine disruptions
_http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~mwave/Report%20on%20Possible%20Impacts%20of%20Com
munication%20Towers.pdf_
(http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/~mwave/Report%20on%20Possible%20Impacts%20of%20Communication%20Towers.pdf)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]