Recomend me a good RF Meter!

> Greetings everyone,
>
> I am seeking experienced suggestions for an affordable yet high
> quality Radio Frequency detector/meter.
>
> My general specifications are as follows:
>
> -Preferably able to differentiate between analog and digital signals
> -Accurate, and Directional (meaning, able to tell exactly where a
> signal is coming from, for determining safe spaces and correct shielding
> -A good range of freq. detection - prefer something which would cover
> towers/masts/cellphones and WiFi.
> -Digital readout in mW/m2, so that it can be determined how strong it
> actually is, versus a "stronger or weaker" method of detection, such
> as by a "broadband" reciever (they are useful, but they don't
> generally display in mW/m2, and are often omni-directional, as in,
> read from all directions)
> -Preferably can run on "standard", meaning non-specialized batteries,
> like AA, AAA, 9V, etc...something you can find most places
> -Affordable! I understand that I'm not talking about something that's
> going to cost only a hundred dollars here. It doesn't have to be
> uber-professional, though it would be nice. I'd really like to not
> have to spend more than 300-400 dollars!
>
> Right now I have my eyes on this meter, the "entry level" one by
> Gigahertz Solutions of Germany:
>
> http://www.safelivingtechnologies.ca/RF/products_rf_meters_eHF32d.htm
>
> What do you all think? Or would you suggest alternatives? (I live in
> Canada, where this company is based, so I'd have to take into account
> overseas shipping costs and customs fees, but I'd still like to hear
> what anyone else has to say).
>
> Someone suggested the audio based electrosmog detector, but I'd like
> something with actual numbers on it.
>
> So, please do let me know, anyone with some knowledge or experience!
>
> Best regards, be well,
>
> R.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

> Hello,
>
> I would never recommend a HF32D, beacuse there is no siund coming from it,
>
> so you cannaot determine what kind of signal you are catching.
>
> I would recommend a HF35C, as a starting model.
> See www.gigahertz-solutions.de or www.priggen.com
>
> Or a Spectran HF-25025E Rev. 3.
> See www.elektrosmog.de
>
> Read several issues of *het bitje*.
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Bitdefender
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "rticleone" <[hidden email] <rticleone%40yahoo.ca>>
> To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 21:39
> Subject: [eSens] Recomend me a good RF Meter!
>
> > Greetings everyone,
> >
> > I am seeking experienced suggestions for an affordable yet high
> > quality Radio Frequency detector/meter.
> >
> > My general specifications are as follows:
> >
> > -Preferably able to differentiate between analog and digital signals
> > -Accurate, and Directional (meaning, able to tell exactly where a
> > signal is coming from, for determining safe spaces and correct shielding
> > -A good range of freq. detection - prefer something which would cover
> > towers/masts/cellphones and WiFi.
> > -Digital readout in mW/m2, so that it can be determined how strong it
> > actually is, versus a "stronger or weaker" method of detection, such
> > as by a "broadband" reciever (they are useful, but they don't
> > generally display in mW/m2, and are often omni-directional, as in,
> > read from all directions)
> > -Preferably can run on "standard", meaning non-specialized batteries,
> > like AA, AAA, 9V, etc...something you can find most places
> > -Affordable! I understand that I'm not talking about something that's
> > going to cost only a hundred dollars here. It doesn't have to be
> > uber-professional, though it would be nice. I'd really like to not
> > have to spend more than 300-400 dollars!
> >
> > Right now I have my eyes on this meter, the "entry level" one by
> > Gigahertz Solutions of Germany:
> >
> > http://www.safelivingtechnologies.ca/RF/products_rf_meters_eHF32d.htm
> >
> > What do you all think? Or would you suggest alternatives? (I live in
> > Canada, where this company is based, so I'd have to take into account
> > overseas shipping costs and customs fees, but I'd still like to hear
> > what anyone else has to say).
> >
> > Someone suggested the audio based electrosmog detector, but I'd like
> > something with actual numbers on it.
> >
> > So, please do let me know, anyone with some knowledge or experience!
> >
> > Best regards, be well,
> >
> > R.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

> so you cannaot determine what kind of signal you are catching.
>
> I would recommend a HF35C, as a starting model.
> See www.gigahertz-solutions.de or www.priggen.com
>
> Or a Spectran HF-25025E Rev. 3.
> See www.elektrosmog.de
>
> Read several issues of *het bitje*.
>
>
>
>
> Greetings,
> Charles Claessens
> member Verband Baubiologie
> www.milieuziektes.nl
> www.milieuziektes.be
> www.hetbitje.nl
> checked by Bitdefender
>

> Hi Charles,
>
> Thanks for your advice. Between the H35C and the Spectran HF-25025E
> Rev. 3, which would you prefer? Both look good!
>
> Regards,
>
> R.
>
> --- In [hidden email], "charles" <charles@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would never recommend a HF32D, beacuse there is no siund coming
> from it,
>> so you cannaot determine what kind of signal you are catching.
>>
>> I would recommend a HF35C, as a starting model.
>> See www.gigahertz-solutions.de or www.priggen.com
>>
>> Or a Spectran HF-25025E Rev. 3.
>> See www.elektrosmog.de
>>
>> Read several issues of *het bitje*.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Charles Claessens
>> member Verband Baubiologie
>> www.milieuziektes.nl
>> www.milieuziektes.be
>> www.hetbitje.nl
>> checked by Bitdefender
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>