Re: Robert Becker, all biological effects may be produced by ELF, Res...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
PUK
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Robert Becker, all biological effects may be produced by ELF, Res...

PUK
Yes this is good thanks - how can we demod the signals from mast and cell  
phones et al before they unfurl and explode in our cells ?  We really are  
dealing with bioemf weapons here, I wonder if the data packs were modified on
 the hf wave what results could be achieved, do we have an infrastructure
in our  midst now that could easily be used as a delivery system - ?
 
 
In a message dated 19/07/2011 16:52:03 GMT Daylight Time,  
[hidden email] writes:

 
 
 
Hi,

In looking at some of the Neil Cherry stuff, mentioned in the  wifi on
trains in New Zealand post, relating to oscillating electromagnetic  signals
interacting with ions,such as calcium ions, and after reading some of  the
Andrew Goldsmith stuff on Charles' website relating to the same things,I  went
back over the Robert Becker book, "Cross Currents…", and I came across  
interesting stuff on why all biological effects may be produced by ELF  
frequencies, and other stuff on the resonance theory of how EMFs may interact  with
the body.

This may have been discussed before, but I just thought  I'd post some
excerpts from a chapter on the above stuff for those who haven't  come across it
before. He puts forward some interesting theories on the role  of the
Earth's normal geomagnetic field, and even suggests that it may be the  most
important single discovery of the century. Here are some  excerpts:

"Modulation is the secret of transmitting information by  means of
electromagnetic fields. AM radio, for example is amplitude modulated:  the radio
receivers "demodulate" the signals, removing the "carrier"  radio-frequency
wave and saving the slowly rising and falling modulation… it  appears that the
body also demodulates the signal when exposed to modulated  radio-frequency
or microwave fields; the biological effect is that of the  low-frequency
modulation.
In this view, all biological effects are produced  by ELF frequencies. This
makes good sense, because the body systems that pick  up the
electromagnetic field are "tuned" to the natural frequencies between  zero and 30 Hz.
These systems will sense abnormal fields that are close to the  normal (between
35 ad 500 Hz). The systems then produce an abnormal effect.  Microwave radar
pulsed at 60 Hz would have the same bioeffect as a 6o Hz field  alone,
which explains the identical effects seen at ELF and microwave  frequencies. It
also indicated that all intervening frequencies (VLF, AM  radio, FM radio
and TV) will have the same biological effects, since they too  are modulated".

Cyclotron resonance Stuff:
"Cyclotron resonance can  be explained as follows, albeit in a somewhat
simplistic fashion: If a charged  particle or ion is exposed to a steady
magnetic field in space, it will begin  to go into a circular, or orbital, motion
at right angles to the applied  magnetic field. The speed with which it
orbits will be determined by the ratio  between the charge and the mass of the
particle and by the strength of the  magnetic field.

We know the frequency of rotation (the number of times  per second that the
particle completes a full rotation) from the equation  relating the charge/
mass ratio of the particle and the strength of the  magnetic field. If an
electric field is added that oscillates at exactly this  frequency at right
angles to the magnetic field, energy is transferred from  the electric field
to the charged particle.
If the direction of the  electric field is slightly off from the right
angle, the particle will move in  a spiral pathway.

We can substitute an oscillating magnetic field for  the electric field and
still obtain cyclotron resonance. However, it must be  applied parallel to
the constant magnetic field.
Cyclotron resonance may be  produced any time there is a steady magnetic
field combined with an  oscillating electric or magnetic field, acting on a
changed particle. Many of  the activities of living cells involve changed
particles – such as the common  ions of sodium (Na +), calcium (Ca ++), and
potassium (K+) – acting on or  passing through the cell membrane. Cyclotron
resonance has the ability to  transfer energy to these ions and to cause them to
move more rapidly. These  effects will change the function of the living
cells by enabling the ions to  pass through the cell membranes more
effectively or in greater  numbers.

Cyclotron resonance is mechanism of action that enable very  low-strength
electromagnetic fields, acting in concert with the Earth's  geomagnetic
field, to produce major biological effects by concentrating the  energy in the
applied field upon specific particles, such as the biologically  important
ions of sodium, calcium, potassium, and lithium.

The equation  for cyclotron resonance says that as the strength of the
steady-state magnetic  field decreases, the frequency of the oscillating
electric or magnetic field  needed to produce resonance also decreases. This is
particularly significant  when the average strength of the Earth's magnetic
field (between 0.2 and 0.6  gauss) is put into the equation: the frequencies
for the oscillating fields  that are needed to produce resonance with the
biologically important ions turn  out to be in the ELF region.
The ELF frequencies – 0-100Hz – become the  most significant part of our
electromagnetic environment. The apparent ability  of the body to demodulate
all higher frequencies, including microwaves,  substantiates this. Cyclotron
resonance provides an understandable and valid  mechanism of action for the
biological effects of both normal and abnormal  electromagnetic fields.

… The importance of the entire resonance theory  cannot be overemphasized.
It provides logical mechanisms whereby single cells  and specific organs,
such as the pineal gland, may intercept and derive  information from
electromagnetic fields. The theory also appears to be  applicable to the basic
relationship between living things and the Earth's  normal electromagnetic
environment."

"…In 1984 I proposed that  resonance between the Earth's natural
steady-state field and the  micropulsation frequencies might provide the timing
mechanism for cell  division. Since the resonance theory is based on frequency,
and not power, it  permits effects from vanishingly small fields…"

"…In theory, all types  of complex resonance may be used in the same way.
The resonant state is  produced when the right combination of fields transfer
energy to a certain  component of the body. The fields are then shifted out
of resonance, and the  excited component releases the energy as an
electromagnetic field that is  sensed by appropriate devices."
"…While the effects of complex resonance  phenomena at the level of ions
and molecules may be significant, the resultant  change in the function or
structure of the cell may be far more important. The  effects of field exposure
at the level of the total organism will be the sum  of the effects at the
molecular level, the cellular level, and the level of  the specific organs
designed to be sensitive to the Earth's normal  electromagnetic field
environment
Field effects on entire functioning organ  are, therefore, a cascade of the
changes that finally result in many different  structural, functional, and
behavioural alterations – such as the new diseases  that are emerging today.

The data obtained in the past few years  indicates very clearly that we
must include the Earth's normal geomagnetic  field as the environmental
variable of great consequence when we deal with the  basic function of living
things. In my opinion, this knowledge is probably the  single most important
discovery of the century. It provides us with a key to  the mechanisms by which
all electromagnetic fields produce biological effects  and it may enable us
to determine more accurately the risks involved in our  technological uses
of such fields. More importantly, it opens a door to a  greater understanding
of life processes, similar to that which was opened by  William Gilbert in
1600 when he began the scientific revolution. The  subsequent discoveries of
the 17th and 18th centuries gave us our present  world. The new discoveries
that are linking us to the Earth's magnetic field  can give us yet another
world, if we explore them properly."  

Sean.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Robert Becker, all biological effects may be produced by ELF, Res...

Gruendg
 
Hallo,
I fully agree with this opinion of Robert Becker. Without knowing his  
statements through my own experimentation I made the same findings, that it is  
mainly the low frequency modulation that does the harm, and that the same
harm  can be produced using the low frequency by itself without a radio
frequency as  carrier. Other scientist had discovered the importance of low
frequency  modulation even in the 70ies of  last century. Well, not all low  
frequencies do harm. There are some that are benificial like the Schumann  
resonance frequency of 7,83 Hz and their harmonics. But the pulsing frequencies  
of GSM are not within that scale.
Now, what does this interesting information help ES-people? Nothing. From  
my experience, it is this harm produced by these low frequencies that is  
neutralized by the electrosmog neutralizing devices. May be this information
is  of some value.
 
dietrich
 
In einer eMail vom 20.07.2011 13:20:59 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt  
[hidden email]:

"Modulation is the secret of transmitting information by means of  
electromagnetic fields. AM radio, for example is amplitude modulated: the  
radio
receivers "demodulate" the signals, removing the "carrier"  radio-frequency
wave and saving the slowly rising and falling modulation…  it appears that
the
body also demodulates the signal when exposed to  modulated radio-frequency
or microwave fields; the biological effect is  that of the low-frequency
modulation.
In this view, all biological  effects are produced by ELF frequencies. This
makes good sense, because  the body systems that pick up the
electromagnetic field are "tuned" to the  natural frequencies between zero
and 30 Hz.
These systems will sense  abnormal fields that are close to the normal
(between
35 ad 500 Hz). The  systems then produce an abnormal effect. Microwave
radar
pulsed at 60 Hz  would have the same bioeffect as a 6o Hz field alone,
which explains the  identical effects seen at ELF and microwave
frequencies. It
also indicated  that all intervening frequencies (VLF, AM radio, FM radio
and TV) will  have the same biological effects, since they too are  
modulated".







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

4G

KathyB

4G Pulsed RF from a phone base cell towers can take out many. I think they're crazy.

Do the ceo's have concrete bunkers? We have reports of people here driving off the road for no reason. The reason is they were in range of a cell tower's beam.
We have cell towers every 1 mile or so now, so you can't be out of range.

Yet, somone I I talked to are  having trouble getting a wi-fi signal, how is that possible?  I'm wrote my legislators. 

AT & T's commercial of 1000's of new cell towers to bring us more of what we want, makes me ill. Where did they get the money to put them up during financial stress?

Kathy
:

 



 










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 4G

S Andreason
Hi Kathy,

> We have reports of people here driving off the road for no reason. The reason is they were in range of a cell tower's beam.
>  
I would expect those USING a cell phone, or those that have bluetooth ON
in the car, or those with WiFi ON in the car to have the most problems
with "distracted" driving. The power levels inside those vehicles are
much MUCH higher than outside the vehicle due to cell-towers.

> We have cell towers every 1 mile or so now, so you can't be out of range.
>
>  
<sarcastic> Nice place </sarcastic> for those who want to be connected,
and frying their dna.

> Yet, somone I I talked to are  having trouble getting a wi-fi signal, how is that possible?
>  
Simple, Cell phones use the 850 Mhz and 1900 Mhz frequency bands. WiFi
is 2400 Mhz. They are different animals, (not to bad mouth animals),
different range, and different characteristics in propagation paths (how
they bounce off hills, or are blocked by hills)

They don't have WiFi towers every mile, so the reception will be
different. (thankfully)


> AT & T's commercial of 1000's of new cell towers to bring us more of what we want, makes me ill. Where did they get the money to put them up during financial stress?
>
>  
It is a simple business decision. People invest in such companies who
build out infrastructure in anticipation of customers, and EXPECT TO
MAKE A LOT OF MONEY.

The health risks are simply not factored into the stock price.
Eventually it will collapse, in a few years. Hopefully sooner than later.

Stewart