Jamie wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield 100X
he knows to stay away because there's RF. The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is in an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you! You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the Trifield 100X. Shivani www.LifeEnergies.com ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
The Trifield, and certainly the Electrosmog Detector are not sensitive
enough for measuring LCD screens, For that a VLF Spion or a Profi Spion with ball antenna is suited. I am awaiting a brandnew optical antenna for my Profi Spion, who wil do all this very nicely. I am also awaiting a new lowfrequency meter, which also displays the found frequncies. At the moment I am busy translating the newest issue of *het bitje* November 2007 into english. The dutch and german editions are already on the HP. It is about the fourth generation of HF meters. Greetings, Charles Claessens member Verband Baubiologie www.milieuziektes.nl www.milieuziektes.be www.hetbitje.nl checked by Bitdefender ----- Original Message ----- From: <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 18:28 Subject: [eSens] Re: RADIOWAVES FROM LCD SCREEN / detecting RF > Jamie wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield > 100X > he knows to stay away because there's RF. > > The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is > in > an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend > relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you! > > You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an > Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the > Trifield 100X. > > Shivani > www.LifeEnergies.com > |
Great Charles,
I am eagerly awaiting your translation! Does it also discuss the instruments you are waiting for? They sound worth knowing more about too. Will you post to this list when the translation is ready? Bill On 11/2/07, charles <[hidden email]> wrote: > > The Trifield, and certainly the Electrosmog Detector are not sensitive > enough for measuring LCD screens, > > For that a VLF Spion or a Profi Spion with ball antenna is suited. > > I am awaiting a brandnew optical antenna for my Profi Spion, who wil do > all > this very nicely. > > I am also awaiting a new lowfrequency meter, which also displays the found > > frequncies. > > At the moment I am busy translating the newest issue of *het bitje* > November > 2007 into english. > The dutch and german editions are already on the HP. > It is about the fourth generation of HF meters. > > Greetings, > Charles Claessens > member Verband Baubiologie > www.milieuziektes.nl > www.milieuziektes.be > www.hetbitje.nl > checked by Bitdefender > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[hidden email] <SArjuna%40aol.com>> > To: <[hidden email] <eSens%40yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 18:28 > Subject: [eSens] Re: RADIOWAVES FROM LCD SCREEN / detecting RF > > > Jamie wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield > > 100X > > he knows to stay away because there's RF. > > > > The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is > > in > > an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend > > relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you! > > > > You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an > > Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the > > Trifield 100X. > > > > Shivani > > www.LifeEnergies.com > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
My reply was to somebody who detected RF from
an LCD monitor using a Trifield meter. That comment still stands, if one sees that meter move a hairs width on "Radio/Microwave" band then you know it's bad stuff. We all know the Trifield is not sensitive, but it does detect a wireless router within a few feet, a microwave oven, and I've seen it pick up ONE cell phone tower while driving down the highway. With that said, it would be wise for an electrosensitive to be equipped with a much more sensitive RF meter in addition to general purpose Trifield. Charles is the expert in this area. My laptop detects 8 wireless networks in my brother's condo, yet my Trifield "RF field strength Meter" detects no ambient RF. It would be great to have a meter that would be sensitive enough to detect these wireless routers. Charles, any suggestions? Eli --- In [hidden email], SArjuna@... wrote: > > Jamie wrote that if he sees the needle move a hair on his Trifield 100X > he knows to stay away because there's RF. > > The ONLY place I've seen the needle move even a hair on this meter is in > an area where there are 6+ tv and radio towers. I would not recommend > relying on this meter if RF is a problem for you! > > You can get an RF alert inexpensively from lessemf.com/. Or, an > Electrosmog Detector from my site. MUCH more sensitive than the Trifield 100X. > > Shivani > www.LifeEnergies.com > > > ************************************** > See what's > new at http://www.aol.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
>It would be great to have a meter that would be sensitive enough to detectthese wireless routers.
For low cost RF meters sensitive enough to detect even background levels (fractions of a nW/cm²), take a look at Electrosmog Meter http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#492 and Better RF Meter (only $89!) at http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#437 Of course, there are better (and more expensive) meters as well. Emil [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
I have found the electrosmog meter to be very useful.
It's compact enough to carry in a large pocket. The readings are a bit temperature dependent, especially for low values. It's not directional in any useful sense, and you can't add a directional antenna. And it doesn't go above 3.5 GHz (although I think it can respond to 5.8GHz, but underreports by a lot). Still I think I need something to detect between the triField and this meter. It would also be better if it had a sound demodulator or other way to identify the source (some meters have selectable frequency bands). The old HF-detektor had demodulation. On 11/3/07, Less EMF Inc <[hidden email]> wrote: > > >It would be great to have a meter that would be sensitive enough to > detect these wireless routers. > For low cost RF meters sensitive enough to detect even background levels > (fractions of a nW/cm²), take a look at Electrosmog Meter > http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#492 and Better RF Meter (only $89!) at > http://www.lessemf.com/rf.html#437 > Of course, there are better (and more expensive) meters as well. > Emil > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
In reply to this post by SArjuna
In a message dated 11/3/2007 6:02:51 PM GMT Standard Time, [hidden email] writes: My reply was to somebody who detected RF from an LCD monitor using a Trifield meter. That comment still stands, if one sees that meter move a hairs width on "Radio/Microwave" band then you know it's bad stuff. We all know the Trifield is not sensitive, but it does detect a wireless router within a few feet, a microwave oven, and I've seen it pick up ONE cell phone tower while driving down the highway. With that said, it would be wise for an Thanks Eli, I only really use the trifeild for emf/efeilds, I have a Electrosmog detector for cell phones etc. The only reason I used the triefeild in RF mode was to check the rf and yes the needle moved to over .1mw/cm2 which I found unusual my noisy laptop does not evan show a twitch on the needle. I am sticking to the esmog detector and early next year a new model is due for release which measure up to 7gig with aread power level display. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |