Hi folks:
One brief note about an errata in my earlier note, below, sent minutes ago:
I accidentally used the term "LF band" in lieu of the term "MF band",
and so, wherever you see the occurrence of "LF", please substitute
"MF". That is what I get for typing fast! Thanks!
with care,
--Vinny
------------ my earlier message: --------
Hi Marc:
I agree, and there is another factor to be possibly considered as
well, since the FM band falls in the VHF range between 88 MHz and 108
MHz: many specialists and experts in the alternative health field
(particularly in the areas of Rife plasma ray beam devices and
similar plasma technologies, electrotherapy devices, "bioenergy"
treatment devices, and also in many niches within the broad realms
known as "radionics" and "psychotronics", actually seem to feel that
most RF frequencies in the range falling between about 400 kHz (i.e.,
just below 0.5 MHz) and about 150 MHz are rather harmless (unless one
is exposed to a great overdose, such as an amateur radio operator
operating with a 2 kW high power transmitter on the HF bands and with
lots of stray RF fields in her shack from equipment and from her
nearby E-field transmitting antenna) and indeed, a number of
electro-therapeutic "alternative healing" treatment devices in the
aforementioned realms deliberately employ frequencies in this range,
particularly at and around the following frequencies:
* 400 KHz to 1.5 MHz
* 14 MHz
* 18 MHz
* 28 MHz
* 120 to 136 MHz
* 150 MHz
Many of these devices bathe the patient undergoing treatment in RF
fields in this frequency range, which encompasses the mid-and-upper
LF range, the HF range and the low-to-mid VHF range.
with care,
--Vinny
At 02:15 PM 11/29/2006, you wrote:
> > For those sensitive to wireless, what would be the difference?
> >
> > Analog or digital. Seems like a bad idea.
>
>FM stations have been broadcasting in my city for decades, and
>there are dozens of them. So it's not like this is something
>that can be avoided. And the small, personal FM
>transmitters are not powerful enough to override an existing
>station, so again, I don't think this is the same thing as
>using a wireless phone or cellphone, which operates at
>higher frequencies and have a much larger range.
>
>But I've already ordered one, so I'll find out for myself
>soon enough...
>
>Marc
Vinny Pinto
[hidden email]
phone 301-694-1249
To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
http://www.vinnypinto.us[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Locked
