Re: Cell tower radiation vs. household EMFs

i've been right underneath masts before and have still measured high
emissions. The mast above the holiday cottage i referred to was on
top of a huge pile or rock which i think probably had more to do with
the lack of emissions detected below at the cottage.

--- In [hidden email], "Ian Kemp" <ianandsue.kemp@...> wrote:
>
> I seem to remember that the UK NRPB did measure fields around masts
and
> found that you could get a reduced level in a small arc just below
them. I
> tried measuring round a local mast, and there may have been a drop,
but the
> level was still pretty high. Should depend on the height of mast
and type
> of equipment.
>  
> Ian
>
> _____  
>
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
Behalf Of round
> make an arch? If you get near the center, in the right area, you
don't
> get hit with the water.  
>
> Depending how the waves go out from the mast, it may be doing
something
> very similar. Anyone who could test this?
>
> ~ Snoshoe
>
> --- In [hidden email], "canaryyuk" <canary65@> wrote:
> > I meant to say in my previous mail that when i was looking for
> > temporary accommodation i looked at a holiday let that was, like
your
> > new place(?), directly underneath a small mast which was on a
moutain
> > top. The place was directly underneath and so shielded by the
> > mountain rock above it. I tried it with my Acom which was silent
as
> > long as i was right next to the house. It sounded as soon as i
> > stepped a metre or two away from the house. But as we all know,
most
> > of us are more sensitive than our Acoms, so i'm pretty certain
there
> > would have been 'rays' reaching the house. I was tempted,
thought it
> > might actually be very ironic to live directly under a mast, but
once <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens> " on
> the web.
>  
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]?subject=Unsubscribe>
>  
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service