Radiofrequency radiation risks

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Radiofrequency radiation risks

Donnie
A new study warns of risks from emissions, suggests towers be kept away from
homes. Just as Ontario announces that cellphones don't need danger labels,
the National Research Council Press publishes research saying we're awash in
radiation from cellphone towers and it does have the potential to hurt us.
And it says Wi-Fi transmissions and smart grids are worrisome too.


http://tinyurl.com/2ckw568

Donnie


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Radiofrequency radiation risks

adiaha22
Thanks sooo much Donnie.  I'm new to this group thanks to lessemf.com who put me onto it.  It always amazes me how ridiculous people are today especially people in health care, engineering and science as well as biology.  These people call themselves scientists. They have BS (no pun intended) degrees and doctorates. Yet they can't figure out that any research they do based upon singular or nominal participation will be ineffective.  How could a study that researched the effects of cell phone, WIFI, smart grid or microwave ovens and not put it into a context of mass usage, expect to render anything other than  erroneous and incomplete data. For example, when I walk down a busy street, I am not being effected only by the cell tower 100 meters away, but by all of the frequencies radiating within an area.  There may be 10,000 phones and laptops irradiating simultaneously (hence electrosmog). But what I feel is an amplification based on the insurgence
 of so many devices radiating within that given area. So why would the research be based on some inadequate observation no where mathematically close to the actual circumstances in which we are exposed today.  Also, this rampant proliferation of microwave technologies can't even successfully be measured beyond 1 generation because 20 years ago we were no where near the numbers that we are exposed to now.  It may take the effects of 2 or more generations to even establish a precedent for what is safe to humans specifically and other life forms in general. Hell of a time to be alive. Not sure it's all for the good--only time will tell. Thanks again for the article!

--- On Mon, 11/8/10, Donnie <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Donnie <[hidden email]>
Subject: [eSens] Radiofrequency radiation risks
To:
Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 9:46 AM


A new study warns of risks from emissions, suggests towers be kept away from
homes. Just as Ontario announces that cellphones don't need danger labels,
the National Research Council Press publishes research saying we're awash in
radiation from cellphone towers and it does have the potential to hurt us.
And it says Wi-Fi transmissions and smart grids are worrisome too.


http://tinyurl.com/2ckw568

Donnie


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






     

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]