RF Meters

 
Anyone have experience with the tm195 RF meter?
 
It was recommended!  Loni

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I have an older one that's similar.

It's useful.

The problem comes that we want it to be more useful than it is.
At low signal levels it is very temperature dependent, doesn't
really go as low as would be ideal for us.
And it doesn't say anything about modulation, and I suspect
(on mine) the Max function doesn't respond fast enough.
It also has modes for checking polarization which don't
really seem to work.

You should have a microwave detector.  I tend to recommend
the ones with audio output so you can hear the peaks.  But
this one has some advantages and could be a workhorse for
us.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote:


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eSens/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [hidden email]
    [hidden email]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [hidden email]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Thanks Bill. Could you recommend a microwave detector? and is that better than an RF Meter?
 
Loni

--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Bill Bruno <[hidden email]> wrote:


From: Bill Bruno <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [eSens] RF Meters
To: [hidden email]
Date: Friday, September 9, 2011, 9:30 AM


I have an older one that's similar.

It's useful.

The problem comes that we want it to be more useful than it is.
At low signal levels it is very temperature dependent, doesn't
really go as low as would be ideal for us.
And it doesn't say anything about modulation, and I suspect
(on mine) the Max function doesn't respond fast enough.
It also has modes for checking polarization which don't
really seem to work.

You should have a microwave detector.  I tend to recommend
the ones with audio output so you can hear the peaks.  But
this one has some advantages and could be a workhorse for
us.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Loni <[hidden email]> wrote:


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]