RE: longitudinal again

Drasko
Check out the work of Cyril Smith regarding the seemingly unexplainable aspects
of EM fields and radiation to see his explanations based on quantum physics. I
am yet to wade through all the papers he ahs written but will get there
eventually
Lachlan

-----Original Message-----
From: Drasko Cvijovic [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Friday, 13 August 2004 2:33 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [eSens] longitudinal again

Dear Beau and David,
I really appreciate seeing that this list got new members like you who
seriously think about the matter!

I would like to comment the mentioning of "longitudinal waves" (or alternative
measures) by both of you.
I have the standpoint to seriously consider any apparently weird theories, as I
am not satisfied by the "official" ones. But it is often very difficult to
separate facts from fiction in such approaches.
Regarding longitudinal waves, I have seen no proof of their existence, and as
far as I know, they can not be measured, if they exist at all. But I am highly
interested to hear any rational facts about such entities, so I would
appreciate any further info.

Regarding the classic measurement, David, for practical purposes there is no
need for 5 instruments, as we need just to estimate the strength. Charles would
have good recommendations about that....


Drasko


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

Hello,

regarding longitudinal waves, look at www.milieuziektes.nl

See the newest report of dr. Warnke.

Greetings,
Charles Claessens
member Verband Baubiologie
www.milieuziektes.nl
www.hetbitje.nl
checked by Norton Antivirus



----- Original Message -----
From: "Lachlan Mudge" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 09:57
Subject: RE: [eSens] longitudinal again


> Drasko
> Check out the work of Cyril Smith regarding the seemingly unexplainable
aspects
> of EM fields and radiation to see his explanations based on quantum
physics. I alternative
> measures) by both of you.
> I have the standpoint to seriously consider any apparently weird theories,
as I
> am not satisfied by the "official" ones. But it is often very difficult to
> separate facts from fiction in such approaches.
> Regarding longitudinal waves, I have seen no proof of their existence, and
as
> far as I know, they can not be measured, if they exist at all. But I am
highly
> interested to hear any rational facts about such entities, so I would
> appreciate any further info.
>
> Regarding the classic measurement, David, for practical purposes there is
no
> need for 5 instruments, as we need just to estimate the strength. Charles
would