RE: Cordless phones and smoke detectors
Locked
RE: Cordless phones and smoke detectors
 
|
Likewise, I've never owned a cordless phone, and if I visit someone who
has one I ask if it can be switched off - if at all possible. Below is a posting from another list on cordless phones, FYI. **************************************** "Your readers might also be interested to know that not only are the new cordless phones potentially dangerous because they are more powerful, but brain tissue is much more absorptive at these higher frequencies than at low frequency. For example, at 50 Mhz, the absorption coefficient for brain grey matter is 0.076 per centimeter; at 900 Mhz it is 0.27 per centimeter; and at 2500 Mhz, the absorption coefficient is 0.54 per centimeter. These are my calculations based on tabulated data of dielectric constant and eelctrical conductivity obtained by Dr. Camelia Gabriel for cadavers and reported in Air Force Report AL/OE-TR-1996-0037 from Brooks AFB. The formula for computing the absorption coefficient is in many text books, one of which is the book Classical Electrodynamics by J.D. Jackson." ******************************************* By the way, does anyone have a problem with domestic smoke detectors? Here in Australia they are compulsory in all homes so I have trouble staying in other people's homes if I am travelling....again I ask for the batteries to be removed. I would be interested to know which other countries have made thhem compulsory for insurance purposes as well. Cheers Sarah -----Original Message----- From: Andrew McAfee [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Friday, 21 January 2005 12:10 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [eSens] Re: New to Group The radiation diminishes with distance of course and depending upon your sensitivity, yes, you are getting it throughout your house. How much radiation you want is up to you. And yes, hotels, cafes, airports that are wired for wireless all have microwave radiation blanketing the area. You will have to figure out what you can handle. I don't even use my meter any more. The symptoms are predictable and in the same places on my body. good luck, Andrew On Jan 20, 2005, at 1:57 PM, danceswild wrote: > > > Thanks Andrew and Cara, > > I only use the speaker phone. I know the phone is terrible up close as > measured by the trifield meter. You mean you can't be anywhere in the > house with it on? Will the meter measure waves at a distance. Are > wireless cafes like this? > > Paul > > > --- In [hidden email], Andrew McAfee <amcafeerr@n...> wrote: >> Welcome to the list. I don't use a cordless phone anymore. The >> radiation from the cordless phone itself gives me a headache. I >> recommend getting an RF meter like the HF-Detektor II PROFI or some >> sensitive RF meter. Check to see if your base is pumping out > radiation >> even when you are not talking on the phone. My inlaws have a > cordless >> phone base station that pumps out radiation higher than a cell > phone! >> I have them unplug it and pull the batteries out of it every time I >> visit. >> >> >> On Jan 20, 2005, at 4:14 AM, danceswild wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello everyone, I just joined the group after hearing about it on >>> CFSexperimental. Hi Marc, we discussed emfs there many times. >>> >>> I got a panasonic home phone with a wireless phone, it is new with >>> 5.8 ghz. I got it because it has speaker phones on the station and >>> hand set so I never have to put my head against it. My question is >>> whether the unit has radiation in general or when the hand set is >>> away from the base. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links |
«
Return to ES
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |