Question About a Schumann Resonance Device

> Hi folks:
>
> I have just heard of a brand/model of an EMF protective device that I
> had never heard of before. It is called the Scalar Synchronizer, and
> seems to be made by Synchroton. It is one of the class of EMF
> protective devices which apparently emits the fundamental Schumann
> resonance frequency as a "scalar wave", much as the Earthclam device
> claims to do, and much as the Electrosmog Corrector and the Earthsafe
> device claim to do. Interestingly, a number of my own
> earlier-generation EMF protective area treatment devices used the
> Schumann frequency emitted as a scalar wave as well; I seem to have
> been intuitively guided in the past two years to largely move away
> from using the Schumann f in my devices (not that there is anything
> wrong with this f, but rather simply that I eventually found some
> materials, methods and processes that made use of the Schumann f
> rather superfluous.
>
> Has anyone seen or played with the Scalar Synchronizer device? It is
> apparently made by a company located in California, and seems to be
> marketed only via one very hard-to-find webpage. Any tales would be
> appreciated! I have heard from an engineer friend with experience in
> this field that he was a bit impressed by the quality of construction
> of the Scalar Synchronizer device when he ripped one apart in his lab.
>
> with care,
> --Vinny
>
>
>
> Vinny Pinto
> [hidden email]
>
> phone 301-694-1249
>
> To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
> http://www.vinnypinto.us
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

>Hello,
>
>it all sounds *funtastic* but I find it very hard to believe.
>
>I only know of the machine by prof. Meyl, who can produce scalar waves.
>
>Nobody in the world does have a meter to measure scalar waves, or
>longitudinal waves.
>So, claims that certain machines can produces scalar waves, I find very hard
>to believe.
>
>Schumann frequency generators do nothing against elektrosmog, how loud the
>advertisements may be.
>
>The Schumann frequencies do come from good old earth.
>It may be, that by all this elektrosmog and shielding against it, these
>Schumann frequencies are suppressed.
>It is very good for having such a device for compensation.
>
>The cosmonauts do also have such a device on board.
>
>Greetings,
>Charles Claessens
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Vinny Pinto" <[hidden email]>
>To: <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>;
><[hidden email]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 14:20
>Subject: [eSens] Question About a Schumann Resonance Device
>
>
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > I have just heard of a brand/model of an EMF protective device that I
> > had never heard of before. It is called the Scalar Synchronizer, and
> > seems to be made by Synchroton. It is one of the class of EMF
> > protective devices which apparently emits the fundamental Schumann
> > resonance frequency as a "scalar wave", much as the Earthclam device
> > claims to do, and much as the Electrosmog Corrector and the Earthsafe
> > device claim to do. Interestingly, a number of my own
> > earlier-generation EMF protective area treatment devices used the
> > Schumann frequency emitted as a scalar wave as well; I seem to have
> > been intuitively guided in the past two years to largely move away
> > from using the Schumann f in my devices (not that there is anything
> > wrong with this f, but rather simply that I eventually found some
> > materials, methods and processes that made use of the Schumann f
> > rather superfluous.
> >
> > Has anyone seen or played with the Scalar Synchronizer device? It is
> > apparently made by a company located in California, and seems to be
> > marketed only via one very hard-to-find webpage. Any tales would be
> > appreciated! I have heard from an engineer friend with experience in
> > this field that he was a bit impressed by the quality of construction
> > of the Scalar Synchronizer device when he ripped one apart in his lab.
> >
> > with care,
> > --Vinny
> >
> >

> Hi Charles:
>
> I note that you have made similar written statements in the past
> about scalar waves, which Rein tends to call "quantum waves" (I
> personally prefer the latter as well, due the incredible butchering
> and mangling of the term "scalar" by certain lecturers and authors
> who are pretty adroit self-promoters. While I have no interest in
> getting into an argument or even a protracted discussion (as I have
> no need to convince you of anything nor to sway you to my point of
> view) with you or anyone else about this matte, my current
> understanding of the matter of scalar waves is as follows:
> * that there are likely several types or kinds of "scalar waves"
> or "quantum waves", some of which travel at the speed of light, and
> wome of which propagate at speeds faster than the speed of light
> (i.e., superluminal speeds).
> * all of the types of "scalar waves" or "quantum waves" are
> relatively difficult to detect with most technological equipment
> which comprises the investigative armamentarium of modern Western science
> * none of these types of non-classical fields are well expalined
> nor conceptualized by the extant models and laws of modern Western
> science.
> * in general, with the exception of a few technological
> novelties, sophisicated high-order (i.e., highly complex) biological
> systems, aka biosystems -- ranging from microbes to cytochromes to
> cells to humans and animals -- seem to be far better at detecting
> such fields/waves than are inanimate machines constructed by
> Earth-bound 20th and 21st century humans
> * largely due to the above-cited reasons, there is a tremendous
> amount of hype and nonsense and science-babble which has come from
> both sides (i.e., the pro side and the con side) over the past 20
> years about such phenomena; much of the worst of the babble on both
> sides of the discussion may be found on the Internet.
> * it appears that there are a number of fairly robust and
> reliable methods of generating one or more of the types of "scalar
> waves" or "quantum waves" which I mentioned earlier. Some few of
> these methods include: excited gas plasma, strong electric fields
> interacting in space or in high-density dielectrics with high
> dielectric coefficient, caduceus coils, bifilar-wound coils, bucking
> solenoidal coils, bucking toroidal coils; the latter few methods were
> mentioned by Glenn Rein in his February 2004 article called
> "Bioinformation Within the Biofield: Beyond Electromagnetics", and
> similar modalities have been cited in multiple works by Dr. William
> Tiller and others.
> As for Schumann f generators, the more responsible vendors simply
> claim that they may help to protect some persons against some of the
> harmful effects of electrosmog by enhancing or strengthening some
> natural signals from the earth-atmosphere-biosphere cavity.
>
> with care,
> --Vinny
>
> At 10:42 AM 11/16/2006, you wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>it all sounds *funtastic* but I find it very hard to believe.
>>
>>I only know of the machine by prof. Meyl, who can produce scalar waves.
>>
>>Nobody in the world does have a meter to measure scalar waves, or
>>longitudinal waves.
>>So, claims that certain machines can produces scalar waves, I find very
>>hard
>>to believe.
>>
>>Schumann frequency generators do nothing against elektrosmog, how loud the
>>advertisements may be.
>>
>>The Schumann frequencies do come from good old earth.
>>It may be, that by all this elektrosmog and shielding against it, these
>>Schumann frequencies are suppressed.
>>It is very good for having such a device for compensation.
>>
>>The cosmonauts do also have such a device on board.
>>
>>Greetings,
>>Charles Claessens
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Vinny Pinto" <[hidden email]>
>>To: <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>;
>><[hidden email]>
>>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 14:20
>>Subject: [eSens] Question About a Schumann Resonance Device
>>
>>
>> > Hi folks:
>> >
>> > I have just heard of a brand/model of an EMF protective device that I
>> > had never heard of before. It is called the Scalar Synchronizer, and
>> > seems to be made by Synchroton. It is one of the class of EMF
>> > protective devices which apparently emits the fundamental Schumann
>> > resonance frequency as a "scalar wave", much as the Earthclam device
>> > claims to do, and much as the Electrosmog Corrector and the Earthsafe
>> > device claim to do. Interestingly, a number of my own
>> > earlier-generation EMF protective area treatment devices used the
>> > Schumann frequency emitted as a scalar wave as well; I seem to have
>> > been intuitively guided in the past two years to largely move away
>> > from using the Schumann f in my devices (not that there is anything
>> > wrong with this f, but rather simply that I eventually found some
>> > materials, methods and processes that made use of the Schumann f
>> > rather superfluous.
>> >
>> > Has anyone seen or played with the Scalar Synchronizer device? It is
>> > apparently made by a company located in California, and seems to be
>> > marketed only via one very hard-to-find webpage. Any tales would be
>> > appreciated! I have heard from an engineer friend with experience in
>> > this field that he was a bit impressed by the quality of construction
>> > of the Scalar Synchronizer device when he ripped one apart in his lab.
>> >
>> > with care,
>> > --Vinny
>> >
>> >
>
>
> Vinny Pinto
> [hidden email]
>
> phone 301-694-1249
>
> To see my informational websites and e-mail list groups, please go to:
> http://www.vinnypinto.us
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

>Hello Vinny,
>
>I completely agree with your statement, except for the last one regarding
>the Schumann f.
>
>I make a distinction between an elektrosmog source and the immune system of
>the human being.
>If one succeeds to improve the damaged immune system, one feels better, and
>can thus better cope with the elektrosmog.
>But this has not done anything to the elektrosmog itsself.
>Nothing has been changed to the elektrosmog source, so nothing has been
>*neutralised* or *harmonized*, or whatever is being claimed.
>
>I may recommend the book *the Field* by Lynne McTaggart in this regard.
>I will go as fas as saying that praying may help against electrosensibility,
>because it may strenghten the immune system.
>
>Under scalar waves, I understand the longitudinal waves Nikola Tesla
>described more than 100 years ago.
>Of course, the USA army knows more about it, because they seem to be having
>scalar wave howitzers according to Tom Bearden.
>
>Greetings,
>Charles Claessens
>member Verband Baubiologie
>www.milieuziektes.nl
>www.milieuziektes.be
>www.hetbitje.nl
>checked by Norton Antivirus
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Vinny Pinto" <[hidden email]>
>To: <[hidden email]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 18:19
>Subject: Re: [eSens] Question About a Schumann Resonance Device
>
>
> > Hi Charles:
> >
> > I note that you have made similar written statements in the past
> > about scalar waves, which Rein tends to call "quantum waves" (I
> > personally prefer the latter as well, due the incredible butchering
> > and mangling of the term "scalar" by certain lecturers and authors
> > who are pretty adroit self-promoters. While I have no interest in
> > getting into an argument or even a protracted discussion (as I have
> > no need to convince you of anything nor to sway you to my point of
> > view) with you or anyone else about this matte, my current
> > understanding of the matter of scalar waves is as follows:
> > * that there are likely several types or kinds of "scalar waves"
> > or "quantum waves", some of which travel at the speed of light, and
> > wome of which propagate at speeds faster than the speed of light
> > (i.e., superluminal speeds).
> > * all of the types of "scalar waves" or "quantum waves" are
> > relatively difficult to detect with most technological equipment
> > which comprises the investigative armamentarium of modern Western science
> > * none of these types of non-classical fields are well expalined
> > nor conceptualized by the extant models and laws of modern Western
> > science.
> > * in general, with the exception of a few technological
> > novelties, sophisicated high-order (i.e., highly complex) biological
> > systems, aka biosystems -- ranging from microbes to cytochromes to
> > cells to humans and animals -- seem to be far better at detecting
> > such fields/waves than are inanimate machines constructed by
> > Earth-bound 20th and 21st century humans
> > * largely due to the above-cited reasons, there is a tremendous
> > amount of hype and nonsense and science-babble which has come from
> > both sides (i.e., the pro side and the con side) over the past 20
> > years about such phenomena; much of the worst of the babble on both
> > sides of the discussion may be found on the Internet.
> > * it appears that there are a number of fairly robust and
> > reliable methods of generating one or more of the types of "scalar
> > waves" or "quantum waves" which I mentioned earlier. Some few of
> > these methods include: excited gas plasma, strong electric fields
> > interacting in space or in high-density dielectrics with high
> > dielectric coefficient, caduceus coils, bifilar-wound coils, bucking
> > solenoidal coils, bucking toroidal coils; the latter few methods were
> > mentioned by Glenn Rein in his February 2004 article called
> > "Bioinformation Within the Biofield: Beyond Electromagnetics", and
> > similar modalities have been cited in multiple works by Dr. William
> > Tiller and others.
> > As for Schumann f generators, the more responsible vendors simply
> > claim that they may help to protect some persons against some of the
> > harmful effects of electrosmog by enhancing or strengthening some
> > natural signals from the earth-atmosphere-biosphere cavity.
> >
> > with care,
> > --Vinny
> >
> > At 10:42 AM 11/16/2006, you wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>it all sounds *funtastic* but I find it very hard to believe.
> >>
> >>I only know of the machine by prof. Meyl, who can produce scalar waves.
> >>
> >>Nobody in the world does have a meter to measure scalar waves, or
> >>longitudinal waves.
> >>So, claims that certain machines can produces scalar waves, I find very
> >>hard
> >>to believe.
> >>
> >>Schumann frequency generators do nothing against elektrosmog, how loud the
> >>advertisements may be.
> >>
> >>The Schumann frequencies do come from good old earth.
> >>It may be, that by all this elektrosmog and shielding against it, these
> >>Schumann frequencies are suppressed.
> >>It is very good for having such a device for compensation.
> >>
> >>The cosmonauts do also have such a device on board.
> >>
> >>Greetings,
> >>Charles Claessens
> >>
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Vinny Pinto" <[hidden email]>
> >>To: <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>;
> >><[hidden email]>
> >>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 14:20
> >>Subject: [eSens] Question About a Schumann Resonance Device
> >>
> >>
> >> > Hi folks:
> >> >
> >> > I have just heard of a brand/model of an EMF protective device that I
> >> > had never heard of before. It is called the Scalar Synchronizer, and
> >> > seems to be made by Synchroton. It is one of the class of EMF
> >> > protective devices which apparently emits the fundamental Schumann
> >> > resonance frequency as a "scalar wave", much as the Earthclam device
> >> > claims to do, and much as the Electrosmog Corrector and the Earthsafe
> >> > device claim to do. Interestingly, a number of my own
> >> > earlier-generation EMF protective area treatment devices used the
> >> > Schumann frequency emitted as a scalar wave as well; I seem to have
> >> > been intuitively guided in the past two years to largely move away
> >> > from using the Schumann f in my devices (not that there is anything
> >> > wrong with this f, but rather simply that I eventually found some
> >> > materials, methods and processes that made use of the Schumann f
> >> > rather superfluous.
> >> >
> >> > Has anyone seen or played with the Scalar Synchronizer device? It is
> >> > apparently made by a company located in California, and seems to be
> >> > marketed only via one very hard-to-find webpage. Any tales would be
> >> > appreciated! I have heard from an engineer friend with experience in
> >> > this field that he was a bit impressed by the quality of construction
> >> > of the Scalar Synchronizer device when he ripped one apart in his lab.
> >> >
> >> > with care,
> >> > --Vinny
> >> >
> >> >

> Hi Charles:
>
> Yes, I agree with you, but I would add that I suspect that it is not
> only the immune system but rather the entire organism which enjoys
> increased vitality, and thus the organism simply notices the
> background noise from the EMF to a lesser extent.
>
> with care,
> --Vinny
>
> At 12:49 PM 11/16/2006, you wrote:
>>Hello Vinny,
>>
>>I completely agree with your statement, except for the last one regarding
>>the Schumann f.
>>
>>I make a distinction between an elektrosmog source and the immune system
>>of
>>the human being.
>>If one succeeds to improve the damaged immune system, one feels better,
>>and
>>can thus better cope with the elektrosmog.
>>But this has not done anything to the elektrosmog itsself.
>>Nothing has been changed to the elektrosmog source, so nothing has been
>>*neutralised* or *harmonized*, or whatever is being claimed.
>>
>>I may recommend the book *the Field* by Lynne McTaggart in this regard.
>>I will go as fas as saying that praying may help against
>>electrosensibility,
>>because it may strenghten the immune system.
>>
>>Under scalar waves, I understand the longitudinal waves Nikola Tesla
>>described more than 100 years ago.
>>Of course, the USA army knows more about it, because they seem to be
>>having
>>scalar wave howitzers according to Tom Bearden.
>>
>>Greetings,
>>Charles Claessens
>>member Verband Baubiologie
>>www.milieuziektes.nl
>>www.milieuziektes.be
>>www.hetbitje.nl
>>checked by Norton Antivirus
>>
>>