Quantum Home results

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Quantum Home results

Deb&John Holland
I tried the Quantum in my home several weeks ago and I couldn't get that
thing out of my house fast enough. It affected me in the exact opposite way
that it was intended. It made me feel so uptight and I had a heaviness in
my chest from it too.

I then tried the rejuvenizer products with great success. I now feel the
peace back in my home and am very pleased at how they work for our family.

Deborah

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I tried the Quantum in my home several weeks ago and I couldn't get that
> thing out of my house fast enough. It affected me in the exact opposite way
> that it was intended. It made me feel so uptight and I had a heaviness in
> my chest from it too.

Sounds like it was too strong for you -- I get those symptoms too when
something is too strong.

> I then tried the rejuvenizer products with great success. I now feel the
> peace back in my home and am very pleased at how they work for our family.

Do you have a website address for these?

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rejuvenator Pendants

Marc Martin
Administrator
>>I then tried the rejuvenizer products with great success. I now feel the
>>peace back in my home and am very pleased at how they work for our family.
>
> Do you have a website address for these?

Oh... looking back at your previous messages, I see you got this from
ToolsForWellness.com:

http://www.toolsforwellness.com/48335.html

You're the first person I know of who has ever tried these products --
good to hear that they're working!

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

bbin37
In reply to this post by Deb&John Holland
I also tried the Quantum Home unit. It had no noticeable effect from
the lowest setting to about 20% of the dial range. I followed the
product recommendations to start low and slowly progress to higher
settings over the course of weeks. Eventually, I found myself having
a highly sensitive feeling, sort of like a lightly touched bruise, in
the parts of my body where EM tends to cause localized difficulty. I
had tension, too, perhaps because these parts were being constantly
overstimulated after being sensitized. I stopped using it and felt
better over the next few days.

As always, I wish the technology behind these items was publicly
available, though I understand the difficulty a manufacturer might
have in patenting some of these things. Due to the
frequency-dependent nature of ES, it is important to be able, if
possible, to modify these devices so they don't emit frequencies in
the ranges that cause symptoms for a particular individual. I'm
following up with Quantum to see what might be possible.

Beau

--- In [hidden email], "Deb&John Holland" <debnjohn1@n...>
wrote:

I tried the Quantum in my home several weeks ago and I couldn't get
that thing out of my house fast enough. It affected me in the exact
opposite way that it was intended. It made me feel so uptight and I
had a heaviness in my chest from it too.

I then tried the rejuvenizer products with great success. I now feel
the peace back in my home and am very pleased at how they work for our
family.

Deborah

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Due to the frequency-dependent nature of ES, it is important to
> be able, if possible, to modify these devices so they don't emit
> frequencies in the ranges that cause symptoms for a particular
> individual. I'm following up with Quantum to see what might be
> possible.

According to the Quantum website, they don't emit any frequencies,
but I assume that this must be false (?)

Although I have had good results with the Quantum stuff in the
past, in the end I'm only using their power strip for my computer,
which is much less powerful, and something that you're generally
exposed to much less than a Quantum Home.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

Marc Martin
Administrator
> Although I have had good results with the Quantum stuff in the
> past, in the end I'm only using their power strip for my computer,
> which is much less powerful, and something that you're generally
> exposed to much less than a Quantum Home.

Oh, and I'm always using the Quantum power strip in combination
with a Springlife Polarizer... I've never found the Quantum
stuff to be sufficient by themselves for the computer... and
so far I haven't found the polarizers to be sufficient by
themselves either. My nutritionist has tested me as using
one for half of my work day and the other for the other half,
but this is not something I've tried. I generally just use
them both, which seems to work fine.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

bbin37
In reply to this post by Marc Martin
> > Due to the frequency-dependent nature of ES, it is important to
> > be able, if possible, to modify these devices so they don't emit
> > frequencies in the ranges that cause symptoms for a particular
> > individual. I'm following up with Quantum to see what might be
> > possible.
>
> According to the Quantum website, they don't emit any frequencies,
> but I assume that this must be false (?)
>
> Although I have had good results with the Quantum stuff in the
> past, in the end I'm only using their power strip for my computer,
> which is much less powerful, and something that you're generally
> exposed to much less than a Quantum Home.
>
> Marc

Hi, Marc,

Yeah, as far as I've read about the Quantum devices they aren't
designed to radiate frequencies from the units as part of their
signal/noise ratio improvement action. What I'm thinking about are
the waveform harmonics the devices generate on the home wiring to
accomplish their action. Also, one other thing that is of possible
concern is the fact that the devices are supposed to increase the
signal/noise ratio. Since we're dealing with a ratio, one way to
directly increase this ratio is by increasing the signal itself. If
one is sensitive to the signal this poses a difficulty.

I placed the unit at an unfrequented location in my house to avoid
directly radiated emissions, but I could tell a difference even
elsewhere in the house. I've written a letter to the inventor so
perhaps he will respond here once he gets it.

I'm very glad you're getting good results with your setup! I'm still
evaluating the Springlife polarizer (large pendant) I obtained. So
far, with careful use, I'm finding some benefit. :)

Beau

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

Marc Martin
Administrator
> I placed the unit at an unfrequented location in my house to avoid
> directly radiated emissions, but I could tell a difference even
> elsewhere in the house. I've written a letter to the inventor so
> perhaps he will respond here once he gets it.

As far as I understand it, the Quantum devices radiate a signal
with a certain radius -- with the Quantum Home, I think it's
about 20 feet. Anything within that radius becomes "coherent".
And in the case of electrical wiring, it may even travel further
than that, because the effect spreads along the wiring.

> I'm very glad you're getting good results with your setup! I'm still
> evaluating the Springlife polarizer (large pendant) I obtained. So
> far, with careful use, I'm finding some benefit. :)

Certainly in the first several weeks, I had to limit my exposure
to the larger pendant because it was overwhelming to me. I even
bought the smaller pendant thinking that would be a better size,
but I found that this really didn't have enough of an effect to
be protective.

However, once I got used to the OM pendant, I think its great!
It really makes a difference everywhere I go, but it's still not
strong enough by itself to help with the computer, so I supplement
it with the Quantum power strip. With both of these items, placement
is critical -- the power strip stays at least 3 feet away from me,
and the pendant is closer. In my pants pocket when I'm out and
about, on the keyboard when I'm using the computer (this works
better than in my pocket), and either on the nightstand or
clipped on my shirt collar when sleeping.

Marc

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

bbin37
> As far as I understand it, the Quantum devices radiate a signal
> with a certain radius -- with the Quantum Home, I think it's
> about 20 feet. Anything within that radius becomes "coherent".
> And in the case of electrical wiring, it may even travel further
> than that, because the effect spreads along the wiring.

The only literature I have on the Quantum Home is on Quantum's web
site. The unit itself didn't come with anything informational
except a usage paper. I could find no mention of the Quantum Home
radiating a signal about itself that creates a zone of coherency about
the unit. What the web site
(http://www.quantumproducts.com/catalog/quantum_home.html)
does say is:

"The electrical currents flow in the same way throughout a building.
When you influence one part of the current, you influence all of it.
So when you plug in one of the Quantum environmental units -Quantum
Home™ or Quantum Pro™ - anywhere in the building, the impulse
of
coherence is sent back into the electrical system maintaining an
efficient electrical current throughout the entire electrical system
of the building and affects the whole environment. This is what is
called a 'Field Effect'."

"The Quantum Home™ covers up to 3000 sq. ft."

"When plugged in it effects the entire electrical system including all
the wiring in the walls and electrical power box, as well as in your
computer, TV, light fixtures, stove, refrigerator, vacuum cleaner, air
conditioner, microwave, etc."

from reading these statements, my impression is that the unit
conditions the electrical system by sending a signal into the wiring.
This conditioning or 'coherency creating' signal travels through the
home's wiring and affects the overall signal/field given off by any
connected wiring within an area up to 3000 sq. ft. So whatever field
effect is created, it is done via the wiring, not within a spherical
zone about the unit itself. If you have other literature from the
manufacturer on this, please send it to me.

Another question that comes up for me is whether this conditioning
signal is tailored to the electrical system based on measuring aspects
of the electricity the Quantum unit receives, or whether some generic
'coherency creating' process is applied.

Beau

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Quantum Home results

Marc Martin
Administrator
> If you have other literature from the
> manufacturer on this, please send it to me.

I do have quite a bit of literature on the product that I received
from various dealers (prior them being sold directly by the
manufacturer on the web), although the most useful information
I've received on their functioning was calling up dealers and
the company on the phone and asking them questions. (although
I still have no reasonable explanation for how the software
works!)

It's also useful to look at this companies website, which
is selling similar products using similar technology ("stolen
technology" might be a more accurate description). They
provide better explanations about what the products are doing:

http://quantumqrt.com/

> Another question that comes up for me is whether this conditioning
> signal is tailored to the electrical system based on measuring aspects
> of the electricity the Quantum unit receives, or whether some generic
> 'coherency creating' process is applied.

My belief is that it is a simply a generic signal which is
transmitted through the air, and is not fed directly into
the electrical system. But I certainly could be wrong, as
listening to dealers isn't always a good way to get accurate
information!

Marc

Marc